PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Anti-Virus
NOD AV new version - still need anti-spyware program?
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Anti-Virus
NOD AV new version - still need anti-spyware program?
![]() |
NOD AV new version - still need anti-spyware program? |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I just upgraded, free, to the new NOD AV which calls itself
an anti-virus and anti-spyware program. Under setup it says clearly "antivirus and antispyware protection". It also says this on the picture of the box cover on the Eset website. I have an NAT router. Do I still need to run/use a separate antispyware program? If so, which one, and do I need to keep realtime protection on? TIA Louise |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:06:43 -0500, louise <louise@invalid.invalid>
wrote the following: >I just upgraded, free, to the new NOD AV which calls itself >an anti-virus and anti-spyware program. Under setup it says >clearly "antivirus and antispyware protection". It also >says this on the picture of the box cover on the Eset website. > >I have an NAT router. I'm also running the latest version of NOD32 and have a NAT router too. >Do I still need to run/use a separate antispyware program? >If so, which one, and do I need to keep realtime protection on? I like to use a firewall in addition to having a router, currently I'm using Kerio 2.1.5. Each morning I check if updates are available for the following: Ad-Aware 2007 Spybot - Search & Destroy Spyware Terminator SpywareBlaster Then I allow the first 3 to run a scan. They seldom find anything so I close them when the scans are finished and I don't feel that I need to have any realtime protection running. -- Ian |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ian Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:06:43 -0500, louise <louise@invalid.invalid> > wrote the following: > >> I just upgraded, free, to the new NOD AV which calls itself >> an anti-virus and anti-spyware program. Under setup it says >> clearly "antivirus and antispyware protection". It also >> says this on the picture of the box cover on the Eset website. >> >> I have an NAT router. > > I'm also running the latest version of NOD32 and have a NAT router > too. > >> Do I still need to run/use a separate antispyware program? >> If so, which one, and do I need to keep realtime protection on? > > I like to use a firewall in addition to having a router, currently I'm > using Kerio 2.1.5. > > Each morning I check if updates are available for the following: > > Ad-Aware 2007 > Spybot - Search & Destroy > Spyware Terminator > SpywareBlaster > > Then I allow the first 3 to run a scan. > They seldom find anything so I close them when the scans are finished > and I don't feel that I need to have any realtime protection running. Thanks - I finally removed kerio from my system because it kept asking questions and after a while I'd allowed so much, it clearly wasn't working. Decided to live with safe hex and the router and NOD. I too run some of the above periodically and it is the realtime protection I'm questioning. I think I'll go without it but be more diligent about running the anti-spyware programs regularly. Louise |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
After serious thinking louise wrote :
> Ian Anderson wrote: >> >> I like to use a firewall in addition to having a router, currently I'm >> using Kerio 2.1.5. > Thanks - I finally removed kerio from my system because it kept asking > questions and after a while I'd allowed so much, it clearly wasn't working. > Decided to live with safe hex and the router and NOD. Maybe you could have a look at this firewall: - Online Armor Free http://www.tallemu.com/online_armor_free.html I used ZoneAlarm and Comodo, but I prefer this one. http://www.matousec.com/projects/wi...rewalls-ratings -- Fred W. te A. (NL) |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
FredW wrote:
> After serious thinking louise wrote : >> Ian Anderson wrote: >>> >>> I like to use a firewall in addition to having a router, currently I'm >>> using Kerio 2.1.5. > >> Thanks - I finally removed kerio from my system because it kept asking >> questions and after a while I'd allowed so much, it clearly wasn't >> working. Decided to live with safe hex and the router and NOD. > > Maybe you could have a look at this firewall: > - Online Armor Free > http://www.tallemu.com/online_armor_free.html > > I used ZoneAlarm and Comodo, but I prefer this one. > http://www.matousec.com/projects/wi...rewalls-ratings > > Thanks - it looks interesting and worth a try. Do you know how it is on resources? And do you think it might be worth getting the full pay one if the free one seems ok or is that unnecessary? Louise |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
louise wrote:
> FredW wrote: >> After serious thinking louise wrote : >>> Ian Anderson wrote: >>>> >>>> I like to use a firewall in addition to having a router, currently I'm >>>> using Kerio 2.1.5. >> >>> Thanks - I finally removed kerio from my system because it kept >>> asking questions and after a while I'd allowed so much, it clearly >>> wasn't working. Decided to live with safe hex and the router and NOD. >> >> Maybe you could have a look at this firewall: >> - Online Armor Free >> http://www.tallemu.com/online_armor_free.html >> >> I used ZoneAlarm and Comodo, but I prefer this one. >> http://www.matousec.com/projects/wi...rewalls-ratings >> >> > Thanks - it looks interesting and worth a try. > > Do you know how it is on resources? > > And do you think it might be worth getting the full pay one if the free > one seems ok or is that unnecessary? > > Louise I just installed the free edition - thought I'd start there. So far, so good - everything seems to be running and it was easy to allow and disallow. Are there special settings I should be aware of? Thanks again. Madeline |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
louise brought next idea :
> FredW wrote: >> After serious thinking louise wrote : >> >>> Thanks - I finally removed kerio from my system because it kept asking >>> questions and after a while I'd allowed so much, it clearly wasn't >>> working. Decided to live with safe hex and the router and NOD. >> >> Maybe you could have a look at this firewall: >> - Online Armor Free >> http://www.tallemu.com/online_armor_free.html >> >> I used ZoneAlarm and Comodo, but I prefer this one. >> http://www.matousec.com/projects/wi...rewalls-ratings >> > Thanks - it looks interesting and worth a try. > Do you know how it is on resources? oaui.exe - 8.192 Kb (as you know by now) > And do you think it might be worth getting the full pay one if the free one > seems ok or is that unnecessary? http://www.tallemu.com/comparisons.html The Free version is a simple, straightforward firewall. For me it is sufficient. See also in Wilders other firewalls forum: http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=192956 (as usual a lot of opinions - attention for #14 #16 #25) http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=192289 As for special settings, all I could suggest is: - Options General - select "Hide Boot Splash Window" - Options Firewall - unselect "Show firewall activity ..." - unselect "Notify me when ...." As for your original question about antispyware, see also Wilders ESET NOD32 AV (V3) forum: http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=191395 -- Fred W. te A. (NL http://www.pinkgron.nl/gron_pic3.htm |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
FredW wrote:
> louise brought next idea : >> FredW wrote: >>> After serious thinking louise wrote : >>> >>>> Thanks - I finally removed kerio from my system because it kept >>>> asking questions and after a while I'd allowed so much, it clearly >>>> wasn't working. Decided to live with safe hex and the router and NOD. >>> >>> Maybe you could have a look at this firewall: >>> - Online Armor Free >>> http://www.tallemu.com/online_armor_free.html >>> >>> I used ZoneAlarm and Comodo, but I prefer this one. >>> http://www.matousec.com/projects/wi...rewalls-ratings >>> >> Thanks - it looks interesting and worth a try. > >> Do you know how it is on resources? > > oaui.exe - 8.192 Kb > (as you know by now) > > >> And do you think it might be worth getting the full pay one if the >> free one seems ok or is that unnecessary? > > http://www.tallemu.com/comparisons.html > The Free version is a simple, straightforward firewall. > For me it is sufficient. > > See also in Wilders other firewalls forum: > http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=192956 > (as usual a lot of opinions - attention for #14 #16 #25) > > http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=192289 > > As for special settings, all I could suggest is: > - Options General > - select "Hide Boot Splash Window" > - Options Firewall > - unselect "Show firewall activity ..." > - unselect "Notify me when ...." > > > As for your original question about antispyware, > see also Wilders ESET NOD32 AV (V3) forum: > http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=191395 > Thanks so much for recommending the Armor Online Free firewall. It really works - is low on resources and speaks to you in comprehensible language when it poses a question. And it's free! I've put it on my desktop and my portable without a single problem. Louise |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

