PC Review Forums Newsgroups Hardware Computer Hardware Celeron

Reply

Celeron

 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 03-06-2006, 03:51 PM   #1
nick
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Celeron


I'm in the market for a linux pc. My question is, is there anything
wrong with Celeron processors? Should Celeron be avoided for some
reason, or are they okay?
What's the deal?

Thanks

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 03:56 PM   #2
philo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Celeron


"nick" <cupofjava1961@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149342703.669781.295950@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> I'm in the market for a linux pc. My question is, is there anything
> wrong with Celeron processors? Should Celeron be avoided for some
> reason, or are they okay?
> What's the deal?
>
> Thanks
>


There is nothing wrong with a Celeron...
but in general you get a better value using an AMD cpu


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 06:14 PM   #3
Mike Walsh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Celeron


The Celeron performance has been limited by the relatively small level 2 cache, e.g. at one time the Celeron had 128 KB L2 cache compared to the Pentium 4 512 KB L2 cache. The difference is not so pronounced these days, e.g. the Celeron in my laptop computer has 1 MB L2 cache.

nick wrote:
>
> I'm in the market for a linux pc. My question is, is there anything
> wrong with Celeron processors? Should Celeron be avoided for some
> reason, or are they okay?
> What's the deal?
>
> Thanks


--
Mike Walsh
West Palm Beach, Florida, U.S.A.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2006, 06:45 AM   #4
paulmd@efn.org
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Celeron


nick wrote:
> I'm in the market for a linux pc. My question is, is there anything
> wrong with Celeron processors? Should Celeron be avoided for some
> reason, or are they okay?
> What's the deal?
>
> Thanks



Celerons have less performance, but they have 3 advantages. 1) They're
cheaper. 2) They run cooler 3) Because of bus speed limitations, some
boards will accept a faster celeron than they will a p3.


There are certian things a celeron cannot do. Like run in pairs (Except
with a custom motherboard, and there's only a handful of those).

A true p3 will beat a similar p3-based celeron. As will a p4, beat a
similar p4-based celeron.

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2006, 07:31 PM   #5
kony
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Celeron

On 3 Jun 2006 06:51:43 -0700, "nick" <cupofjava1961@aol.com>
wrote:

>I'm in the market for a linux pc. My question is, is there anything
>wrong with Celeron processors? Should Celeron be avoided for some
>reason, or are they okay?
>What's the deal?
>
>Thanks


Linux not really an issue here, as always you are just
buying a piece of equipment and have to decide if the
performance/price is right or if you wanted to pay more for
a higher performing CPU. A Celeron is fine for most basic
tasks, even more advanced tasks these days so long as there
is no realtime performance need.
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off