PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Computer Hardware
Celeron
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Computer Hardware
Celeron
![]() |
Celeron |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm in the market for a linux pc. My question is, is there anything
wrong with Celeron processors? Should Celeron be avoided for some reason, or are they okay? What's the deal? Thanks |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"nick" <cupofjava1961@aol.com> wrote in message news:1149342703.669781.295950@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > I'm in the market for a linux pc. My question is, is there anything > wrong with Celeron processors? Should Celeron be avoided for some > reason, or are they okay? > What's the deal? > > Thanks > There is nothing wrong with a Celeron... but in general you get a better value using an AMD cpu |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The Celeron performance has been limited by the relatively small level 2 cache, e.g. at one time the Celeron had 128 KB L2 cache compared to the Pentium 4 512 KB L2 cache. The difference is not so pronounced these days, e.g. the Celeron in my laptop computer has 1 MB L2 cache. nick wrote: > > I'm in the market for a linux pc. My question is, is there anything > wrong with Celeron processors? Should Celeron be avoided for some > reason, or are they okay? > What's the deal? > > Thanks -- Mike Walsh West Palm Beach, Florida, U.S.A. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
nick wrote: > I'm in the market for a linux pc. My question is, is there anything > wrong with Celeron processors? Should Celeron be avoided for some > reason, or are they okay? > What's the deal? > > Thanks Celerons have less performance, but they have 3 advantages. 1) They're cheaper. 2) They run cooler 3) Because of bus speed limitations, some boards will accept a faster celeron than they will a p3. There are certian things a celeron cannot do. Like run in pairs (Except with a custom motherboard, and there's only a handful of those). A true p3 will beat a similar p3-based celeron. As will a p4, beat a similar p4-based celeron. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 3 Jun 2006 06:51:43 -0700, "nick" <cupofjava1961@aol.com>
wrote: >I'm in the market for a linux pc. My question is, is there anything >wrong with Celeron processors? Should Celeron be avoided for some >reason, or are they okay? >What's the deal? > >Thanks Linux not really an issue here, as always you are just buying a piece of equipment and have to decide if the performance/price is right or if you wanted to pay more for a higher performing CPU. A Celeron is fine for most basic tasks, even more advanced tasks these days so long as there is no realtime performance need. |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

