PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows Vista
Windows Vista Installation
MVP, please re: Vista Activation, SysPrep in testing environment
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows Vista
Windows Vista Installation
MVP, please re: Vista Activation, SysPrep in testing environment
![]() |
MVP, please re: Vista Activation, SysPrep in testing environment |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
This was originally posted 5/26, and got no response.
We work with a lot of virtual machines in a product testing environment -- up to now, only Win2K and XP. We have always Sysprep'ed our configurations, and used a Sysprep.inf setting to supply our MSDN Volume License key. If we need to make a new version of a config (e.g. to generate a new image with the lastest patches), we boot from a copy of the prior image, which activates and gives us a unique machine ID. We then install the patches, and re-run Sysprep -mini -quit -reseal. We have not had any problem making an indefinite number of generations. However, in reading the Vista documentation, I became concerned that this may no longer be the case. The documentation says that "You can use the sysprep /generalize command to reset Windows Product Activation a maximum of three times. After the third time you run the sysprep /generalize command the clock can no longer be reset." Which is it? Will it refuse to reset the activation, and leave me unable to create a new generation, or will it only refuse to reset the clock (meaning that the resulting machine needs to be activated immediately before it can be used)?? If the latter, and if the unattend.xml supplies a product key, and if the machine has internet access, will that solve the problem, by activating the new machine before I even get a logon prompt? -- Fletcher James President Levit & James, Inc. (703)771-1549 MailTo:fjames@levitjames.com http://www.levitjames.com |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Fletcher,
Sysprep in Vista is limited to three resets of the timer, this is not new. What you can do; maybe not what is wanted, but what is possible; is to create the original image and generalize it, thus preserving it for future updates. Then use this image as the basis for future updates. After each update, and another generalize step, the second timer reset will occur, but that is not a problem. This will allow using the image essentially indefinitely. It would be convenient if there were no limit of three, but that is the reality which we have. John Baker |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I was intending to image the system before generalizing, and applying the
updates to the still-activated image. However, there are certain circumstances in which we will take a machine from the child generation and decide that we have to generalize that as well. For example, we could wish to maintain pre- and post- service pack base machines, for testing compatibility of our apps. Yes, we could go back to a copy of the original image, to make the changes, but then we would have two originals with the same SID, etc, unless we add a number of new steps, some of which might result in invalidation the prior activation. The second part of my question related to what happens if we <do> run out of the 3 generations: does the system refuse to boot at all, or does it simply require activation? In the latter case, if we've supplied a product key in unattend.xml, will that make the re-activation automatic, or will we need to do something manually? -- Fletcher James President Levit & James, Inc. (703)771-1549 MailTo:fjames@levitjames.com http://www.levitjames.com "JRB Associates" <info@jrb-assoc.com> wrote in message news:uhkHSx6oHHA.3512@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > Fletcher, > > Sysprep in Vista is limited to three resets of the timer, this is not new. > What you can do; maybe not what is wanted, but what is possible; is to > create the original image and generalize it, thus preserving it for future > updates. Then use this image as the basis for future updates. After each > update, and another generalize step, the second timer reset will occur, > but that is not a problem. This will allow using the image essentially > indefinitely. It would be convenient if there were no limit of three, but > that is the reality which we have. > > John Baker > > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

