PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows Vista
Windows Vista General Discussion
Does ADMINISTRATOR Account Exist?
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows Vista
Windows Vista General Discussion
Does ADMINISTRATOR Account Exist?
![]() |
Does ADMINISTRATOR Account Exist? |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is there still a separate Administrator user account in Vista or is that
account now replaced by any user account with administrator rights? I don't see any user with the name ADMINISTRATOR. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It exists but it is well hidden...
I posted a tweak some time ago that explained how to make it vieable again... ill try to find it and post back "John" <me@myhome.net> wrote in message news:%23dmH2%23VmHHA.3264@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > Is there still a separate Administrator user account in Vista or is that > account now replaced by any user account with administrator rights? I > don't see any user with the name ADMINISTRATOR. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
ahh yes .. see here
http://www.computerworld.com/action...38&pageNumber=1 Number 2: Unlock the supersecret Administrator account Deep inside the bowels of Windows Vista, there's a secret Administrator account, and it's different from the normal administrator account you most likely have set up on your PC. This Administrator account is not part of the Administrator group. (Confused yet? You should be.) It's a kind of superadministrator, akin to the root account in Unix, and by default it's turned off and hidden. (In describing this hack, we'll always use the capital "A" for the secret Administrator account, and a lowercase "a" for a normal administrator account.) "John" <me@myhome.net> wrote in message news:%23dmH2%23VmHHA.3264@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > Is there still a separate Administrator user account in Vista or is that > account now replaced by any user account with administrator rights? I > don't > see any user with the name ADMINISTRATOR. > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
/John/ said:
> Is there still a separate Administrator user account in Vista or is that > account now replaced by any user account with administrator rights? I don't > see any user with the name ADMINISTRATOR. > START button|HELP & SUPPORT Into the search box, type "administrator" |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It's disabled by default. If you go to Start/All programs/Administrative
Tools/Computer Management/Local Users and Groups/Users and double-click Administrator you will see the settings there. If you uncheck "Account is disabled" it will then show on the log-in screen. Bit if you do that I would suggest immediately logging into it and passwording it via Control Panel/User Accounts & Family Safety/User Accounts -- Peter Toronto, Canada XP Pro SP2 x 2 + Vista Ultimate Triple Boot P4 dual HT @ 3.0ghz, 4gb DDR, 700gb HDD "John" <me@myhome.net> wrote in message news:%23dmH2%23VmHHA.3264@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > Is there still a separate Administrator user account in Vista or is that > account now replaced by any user account with administrator rights? I > don't see any user with the name ADMINISTRATOR. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you all for your help. I have brought the ADMINISTRATOR to life.
One further question: Is there a difference in making changes to any part of Vista if you are a User with Administrator rights or if you are the real ADMINISTRATOR? "John" <me@myhome.net> wrote in message news:%23dmH2%23VmHHA.3264@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > Is there still a separate Administrator user account in Vista or is that > account now replaced by any user account with administrator rights? I > don't see any user with the name ADMINISTRATOR. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There's probably no good reason to activate the built-in Administrator
account in Vista. That account is designed to be disabled, except in cases where no other admin account is viable on the system. When a serious system error condition causes no other admin accounts to be available you can boot into Safe Mode and will find that Administrator is, indeed, available. And it won't require a password for logon. I know there are people posting how to activate the account. But you might want to ask yourself why Microsoft chose to have it disabled in the first place. The security architecture of this OS is designed to work with that account disabled. Sometimes, with a new OS, it's best to check out its design to see if, maybe, it will work better than its predecessor -- before trying to make it behave just like its predecessor. I'm no trying to preach. I'm just advising some caution, along with some good old-fashioned curiosity and the chance to learn something new. "John" wrote: > Is there still a separate Administrator user account in Vista or is that > account now replaced by any user account with administrator rights? I don't > see any user with the name ADMINISTRATOR. > > |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I agree with your thinking. My hope was the hidden ADMINISTRATOR account had
'powers' beyond a user with administrative rights. I need some of these 'powers' to make a registry edit work in IE7... or so I thought. But isn't this a glaring security hole: "When a serious system error condition causes no other admin accounts to be available you can boot into Safe Mode and will find that Administrator is, indeed, available. And it won't require a password for logon." Couldn't anyone boot this way and hack the computer? I must be missing something. "jimmuh" <jimmuh@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:8347ECC3-1827-445A-A823-0648A746A22B@microsoft.com... > There's probably no good reason to activate the built-in Administrator > account in Vista. That account is designed to be disabled, except in cases > where no other admin account is viable on the system. When a serious > system > error condition causes no other admin accounts to be available you can > boot > into Safe Mode and will find that Administrator is, indeed, available. And > it > won't require a password for logon. > > I know there are people posting how to activate the account. But you might > want to ask yourself why Microsoft chose to have it disabled in the first > place. The security architecture of this OS is designed to work with that > account disabled. Sometimes, with a new OS, it's best to check out its > design > to see if, maybe, it will work better than its predecessor -- before > trying > to make it behave just like its predecessor. > > I'm no trying to preach. I'm just advising some caution, along with some > good old-fashioned curiosity and the chance to learn something new. > > "John" wrote: > >> Is there still a separate Administrator user account in Vista or is that >> account now replaced by any user account with administrator rights? I >> don't >> see any user with the name ADMINISTRATOR. >> >> |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The built-in administrator isn't really different, from an operational
standpoint, than any other admin account -- other than there being no UAC prompt (AFAIK) when you do something that requires elevated privileges. That, in and of itself, is a good reason to leave the account deactivated. It may be true that a malicious person might find a way to disable the other admin accounts so that s/he could reboot and gain access to the system through the password-less Administrator account. (Just booting to Safe Mode with even one other admin account still viable will NOT get you the ability to log in as Administrator.) But, if you think about it, the only effective way to do that would be to already have logged in as an admin or to boot with an alternative OS (on CD/DVD, other drive, etc.) in order to damage those accounts. In either case, the person already has had access to everything anyway. You really can't protect a system from a determined, knowledgeable person who already has had access to the system as an admin. The passwordless Administrator account which only becomes available when all other admin accounts fail can make life a lot easier for tech support people. (No more forgotten passwords.) I imagine that this was a prime motivating factor in the way Microsoft designed this feature. BTW, I did activate my Administrator account temporarily on my Vista systems -- just long enough to put a really nasty password on it. Then I deactivated the accounts on all Vista machines. But that was before I had thought my way through the way the feature works. Not sure that it matters, anyway. I use a BIOS startup password and take all drives but the primary hard drive out of the boot sequence on my critical systems. The drive is encrypted through the BIOS, so moving it to another system won't gain admittance to the data on it. But those precautions are, I think, pretty extreme and more than most people want or need. Regarding the actual question in your original post, if your version of Vista has a policy editor you can open compmgmt.msc and look under Local Users and Computers to confirm that the Administrator account does, indeed, exist. But the account doesn't show up in "control userpasswords2" -- unless it has been activated. "John" wrote: > I agree with your thinking. My hope was the hidden ADMINISTRATOR account had > 'powers' beyond a user with administrative rights. I need some of these > 'powers' to make a registry edit work in IE7... or so I thought. > > But isn't this a glaring security hole: "When a serious system > error condition causes no other admin accounts to be available you can boot > into Safe Mode and will find that Administrator is, indeed, available. And > it > won't require a password for logon." > > Couldn't anyone boot this way and hack the computer? I must be missing > something. > > > "jimmuh" <jimmuh@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:8347ECC3-1827-445A-A823-0648A746A22B@microsoft.com... > > There's probably no good reason to activate the built-in Administrator > > account in Vista. That account is designed to be disabled, except in cases > > where no other admin account is viable on the system. When a serious > > system > > error condition causes no other admin accounts to be available you can > > boot > > into Safe Mode and will find that Administrator is, indeed, available. And > > it > > won't require a password for logon. > > > > I know there are people posting how to activate the account. But you might > > want to ask yourself why Microsoft chose to have it disabled in the first > > place. The security architecture of this OS is designed to work with that > > account disabled. Sometimes, with a new OS, it's best to check out its > > design > > to see if, maybe, it will work better than its predecessor -- before > > trying > > to make it behave just like its predecessor. > > > > I'm no trying to preach. I'm just advising some caution, along with some > > good old-fashioned curiosity and the chance to learn something new. > > > > "John" wrote: > > > >> Is there still a separate Administrator user account in Vista or is that > >> account now replaced by any user account with administrator rights? I > >> don't > >> see any user with the name ADMINISTRATOR. > >> > >> > > |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hm. There's no "Local Users & Groups" when I get to Computer Management.
What might THAT mean? Kristy "Peter" <peterm@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:E5FDE0DB-750F-408D-8043-E74044467BCF@microsoft.com... > It's disabled by default. If you go to Start/All > programs/Administrative Tools/Computer Management/Local Users and > Groups/Users and double-click Administrator you will see the settings > there. > If you uncheck "Account is disabled" it will then show on the log-in > screen. Bit if you do that I would suggest immediately logging into it and > passwording it via Control Panel/User Accounts & Family Safety/User > Accounts > > -- > Peter > Toronto, Canada > XP Pro SP2 x 2 + Vista Ultimate Triple Boot > P4 dual HT @ 3.0ghz, 4gb DDR, 700gb HDD > "John" <me@myhome.net> wrote in message > news:%23dmH2%23VmHHA.3264@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> Is there still a separate Administrator user account in Vista or is that >> account now replaced by any user account with administrator rights? I >> don't see any user with the name ADMINISTRATOR. > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

