Improved WLAN performance

General inquiry...

I have an SMC 802.11b/g PCI card configured with WEP to an AP 6-8 feet away.
My bandwidth throughput (maximum sustained upload or download rates) have
been better in Vista than XP (same machine, dual-boot setup).

Am I the only person who has seen *improved* wireless bandwidth throughput
on Vista versus XP? ... or am I dreaming because Vista might calculate
throughput differently?

- naseru

Could be the new networking stack - although Vista is at Beta 2, I wouldn't
have said that the actual networking stack is at the same quality. Make sure
that IPv6 is disabled in your settings... and try bugging it )
http://www.vistabase.co.uk/welcome.php?bugreport - options to bug.

--
Zack Whittaker
» ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk
» MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org
» Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk
» This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not
of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared
that up!

--: Original message follows :--
"Naseru" <naseru@antideas.com> wrote in message
news:EA7F8090-32DC-4F4E-8E69-FE047836325A@microsoft.com...
> General inquiry...
>
> I have an SMC 802.11b/g PCI card configured with WEP to an AP 6-8 feet
> away. My bandwidth throughput (maximum sustained upload or download rates)
> have been better in Vista than XP (same machine, dual-boot setup).
>
> Am I the only person who has seen *improved* wireless bandwidth throughput
> on Vista versus XP? ... or am I dreaming because Vista might calculate
> throughput differently?
>
> - naseru

yes, you are the ONLY person experiencing better throughput. Good luck on
your side!

"Zack Whittaker" wrote:

> Could be the new networking stack - although Vista is at Beta 2, I wouldn't
> have said that the actual networking stack is at the same quality. Make sure
> that IPv6 is disabled in your settings... and try bugging it )
> http://www.vistabase.co.uk/welcome.php?bugreport - options to bug.
>
> --
> Zack Whittaker
> » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk
> » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org
> » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk
> » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not
> of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared
> that up!
>
> --: Original message follows :--
> "Naseru" <naseru@antideas.com> wrote in message
> news:EA7F8090-32DC-4F4E-8E69-FE047836325A@microsoft.com...
> > General inquiry...
> >
> > I have an SMC 802.11b/g PCI card configured with WEP to an AP 6-8 feet
> > away. My bandwidth throughput (maximum sustained upload or download rates)
> > have been better in Vista than XP (same machine, dual-boot setup).
> >
> > Am I the only person who has seen *improved* wireless bandwidth throughput
> > on Vista versus XP? ... or am I dreaming because Vista might calculate
> > throughput differently?
> >
> > - naseru
>
>
>

Haha, thanks =)

"gautam" <gautam@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:E7E67D58-7595-42E0-B996-DC34BE0D8D0C@microsoft.com...
> yes, you are the ONLY person experiencing better throughput. Good luck on
> your side!
>
> "Zack Whittaker" wrote:
>
>> Could be the new networking stack - although Vista is at Beta 2, I
>> wouldn't
>> have said that the actual networking stack is at the same quality. Make
>> sure
>> that IPv6 is disabled in your settings... and try bugging it )
>> http://www.vistabase.co.uk/welcome.php?bugreport - options to bug.
>>
>> --
>> Zack Whittaker
>> » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk
>> » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org
>> » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk
>> » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no
>> rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and
>> not
>> of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared
>> that up!
>>
>> --: Original message follows :--
>> "Naseru" <naseru@antideas.com> wrote in message
>> news:EA7F8090-32DC-4F4E-8E69-FE047836325A@microsoft.com...
>> > General inquiry...
>> >
>> > I have an SMC 802.11b/g PCI card configured with WEP to an AP 6-8 feet
>> > away. My bandwidth throughput (maximum sustained upload or download
>> > rates)
>> > have been better in Vista than XP (same machine, dual-boot setup).
>> >
>> > Am I the only person who has seen *improved* wireless bandwidth
>> > throughput
>> > on Vista versus XP? ... or am I dreaming because Vista might calculate
>> > throughput differently?
>> >
>> > - naseru
>>
>>
>>

Thanks for the reminder (networking stacks). I actually have IPv6 enabled
on both XP and Vista OSes, oh well. I'm actually interested in going
all-IPv6 in the near future.

- naseru

"Zack Whittaker" <admin@zacknet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Oz9Qcm8hGHA.1508@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Could be the new networking stack - although Vista is at Beta 2, I
> wouldn't have said that the actual networking stack is at the same
> quality. Make sure that IPv6 is disabled in your settings... and try
> bugging it )
> http://www.vistabase.co.uk/welcome.php?bugreport - options to bug.
>
> --
> Zack Whittaker
> » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk
> » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org
> » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk
> » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and
> not
> of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared
> that up!
>
> --: Original message follows :--
> "Naseru" <naseru@antideas.com> wrote in message
> news:EA7F8090-32DC-4F4E-8E69-FE047836325A@microsoft.com...
>> General inquiry...
>>
>> I have an SMC 802.11b/g PCI card configured with WEP to an AP 6-8 feet
>> away. My bandwidth throughput (maximum sustained upload or download
>> rates) have been better in Vista than XP (same machine, dual-boot setup).
>>
>> Am I the only person who has seen *improved* wireless bandwidth
>> throughput on Vista versus XP? ... or am I dreaming because Vista might
>> calculate throughput differently?
>>
>> - naseru
>
>

He's not the only one. I went from 3-4mbs on my heavily tweaked XP system to
5-6mbs with Vista. While I find some aspects of Vista annoying, I may keep it
just because of that improvement.

"gautam" wrote:

> yes, you are the ONLY person experiencing better throughput. Good luck on
> your side!
>
> "Zack Whittaker" wrote:
>
> > Could be the new networking stack - although Vista is at Beta 2, I wouldn't
> > have said that the actual networking stack is at the same quality. Make sure
> > that IPv6 is disabled in your settings... and try bugging it )
> > http://www.vistabase.co.uk/welcome.php?bugreport - options to bug.
> >
> > --
> > Zack Whittaker
> > » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk
> > » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org
> > » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk
> > » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no
> > rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not
> > of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared
> > that up!
> >
> > --: Original message follows :--
> > "Naseru" <naseru@antideas.com> wrote in message
> > news:EA7F8090-32DC-4F4E-8E69-FE047836325A@microsoft.com...
> > > General inquiry...
> > >
> > > I have an SMC 802.11b/g PCI card configured with WEP to an AP 6-8 feet
> > > away. My bandwidth throughput (maximum sustained upload or download rates)
> > > have been better in Vista than XP (same machine, dual-boot setup).
> > >
> > > Am I the only person who has seen *improved* wireless bandwidth throughput
> > > on Vista versus XP? ... or am I dreaming because Vista might calculate
> > > throughput differently?
> > >
> > > - naseru
> >
> >
> >