Http server for Vista?

I know it's still beta, but anyone know of an http server that works in
Vista currently? I love using Vista and am reporting any bugs I find however
I normally have an apache http server running for a webpage that I have.
I'm unable to get it to work in Vista. . .seems to install properly from
what I can tell, but can't get it to load up. Errors with ports.
...firewalls' not enabled in Vista either. . .so. .shouldn't be a problem?
(works fine on my winXP boot)

Thanks in advance!

Check if MS defender has something to do with it, so disable it for a test.

--
Try, learn, experience.


"Skybase" wrote:

> I know it's still beta, but anyone know of an http server that works in
> Vista currently? I love using Vista and am reporting any bugs I find however
> I normally have an apache http server running for a webpage that I have.
> I'm unable to get it to work in Vista. . .seems to install properly from
> what I can tell, but can't get it to load up. Errors with ports.
> ...firewalls' not enabled in Vista either. . .so. .shouldn't be a problem?
> (works fine on my winXP boot)
>
> Thanks in advance!
>

Okay, I tried that. Disabling that didn't help. The error message that I'm
getting from Apache server when trying to start it is as follows (Perhaps
I'm just messing up w/ a setting in Apache?)

<OS 10048>Only one usage of each socket address <protocol/network
address/port> is normally permitted. : make_sock: could not bind to address
0.0.0.0:80
No listening sockets available, shutting down
Unable to open logs
Note the errosr or messages above, and press the <ESC> key to exit.

Thanks for replying, btw!


"rahi" <rahi@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3942854B-1DAE-465D-98B1-0FA7453DC463@microsoft.com...
> Check if MS defender has something to do with it, so disable it for a
> test.
>
> --
> Try, learn, experience.
>
>
> "Skybase" wrote:
>
>> I know it's still beta, but anyone know of an http server that works in
>> Vista currently? I love using Vista and am reporting any bugs I find
>> however
>> I normally have an apache http server running for a webpage that I have.
>> I'm unable to get it to work in Vista. . .seems to install properly from
>> what I can tell, but can't get it to load up. Errors with ports.
>> ...firewalls' not enabled in Vista either. . .so. .shouldn't be a
>> problem?
>> (works fine on my winXP boot)
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>

If i intepreted that right, there is port 80 already in use. Check which
process has it open. Might have something to do with beta reporting tools etc.
--
Try, learn, experience.


"Skybase" wrote:

> Okay, I tried that. Disabling that didn't help. The error message that I'm
> getting from Apache server when trying to start it is as follows (Perhaps
> I'm just messing up w/ a setting in Apache?)
>
> <OS 10048>Only one usage of each socket address <protocol/network
> address/port> is normally permitted. : make_sock: could not bind to address
> 0.0.0.0:80
> No listening sockets available, shutting down
> Unable to open logs
> Note the errosr or messages above, and press the <ESC> key to exit.
>
> Thanks for replying, btw!
>
>
> "rahi" <rahi@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:3942854B-1DAE-465D-98B1-0FA7453DC463@microsoft.com...
> > Check if MS defender has something to do with it, so disable it for a
> > test.
> >
> > --
> > Try, learn, experience.
> >
> >
> > "Skybase" wrote:
> >
> >> I know it's still beta, but anyone know of an http server that works in
> >> Vista currently? I love using Vista and am reporting any bugs I find
> >> however
> >> I normally have an apache http server running for a webpage that I have.
> >> I'm unable to get it to work in Vista. . .seems to install properly from
> >> what I can tell, but can't get it to load up. Errors with ports.
> >> ...firewalls' not enabled in Vista either. . .so. .shouldn't be a
> >> problem?
> >> (works fine on my winXP boot)
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance!
> >>
>

I'll have to check that. . .Hehe thanks again. *smile* I may be missing
something simple but I don't know offhand where to see what ports are being
used. .? Any help? Hehe

Thanks yet again!

Dave

"rahi" <rahi@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:411A6627-168C-49F4-A2A8-B62DE964D1AE@microsoft.com...
> If i intepreted that right, there is port 80 already in use. Check which
> process has it open. Might have something to do with beta reporting tools
> etc.
> --
> Try, learn, experience.
>
>
> "Skybase" wrote:
>
>> Okay, I tried that. Disabling that didn't help. The error message that
>> I'm
>> getting from Apache server when trying to start it is as follows (Perhaps
>> I'm just messing up w/ a setting in Apache?)
>>
>> <OS 10048>Only one usage of each socket address <protocol/network
>> address/port> is normally permitted. : make_sock: could not bind to
>> address
>> 0.0.0.0:80
>> No listening sockets available, shutting down
>> Unable to open logs
>> Note the errosr or messages above, and press the <ESC> key to exit.
>>
>> Thanks for replying, btw!
>>
>>
>> "rahi" <rahi@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:3942854B-1DAE-465D-98B1-0FA7453DC463@microsoft.com...
>> > Check if MS defender has something to do with it, so disable it for a
>> > test.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Try, learn, experience.
>> >
>> >
>> > "Skybase" wrote:
>> >
>> >> I know it's still beta, but anyone know of an http server that works
>> >> in
>> >> Vista currently? I love using Vista and am reporting any bugs I find
>> >> however
>> >> I normally have an apache http server running for a webpage that I
>> >> have.
>> >> I'm unable to get it to work in Vista. . .seems to install properly
>> >> from
>> >> what I can tell, but can't get it to load up. Errors with ports.
>> >> ...firewalls' not enabled in Vista either. . .so. .shouldn't be a
>> >> problem?
>> >> (works fine on my winXP boot)
>> >>
>> >> Thanks in advance!
>> >>
>>

try "netstat" command?

--
Regards,
Yuriy

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Skybase" <mtskybase@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:20A4CBC1-6C6C-452E-AC54-BD553EC831BD@microsoft.com...
> I'll have to check that. . .Hehe thanks again. *smile* I may be missing
> something simple but I don't know offhand where to see what ports are
being
> used. .? Any help? Hehe
>
> Thanks yet again!
>
> Dave
>
> "rahi" <rahi@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:411A6627-168C-49F4-A2A8-B62DE964D1AE@microsoft.com...
> > If i intepreted that right, there is port 80 already in use. Check which
> > process has it open. Might have something to do with beta reporting
tools
> > etc.
> > --
> > Try, learn, experience.
> >
> >
> > "Skybase" wrote:
> >
> >> Okay, I tried that. Disabling that didn't help. The error message
that
> >> I'm
> >> getting from Apache server when trying to start it is as follows
(Perhaps
> >> I'm just messing up w/ a setting in Apache?)
> >>
> >> <OS 10048>Only one usage of each socket address <protocol/network
> >> address/port> is normally permitted. : make_sock: could not bind to
> >> address
> >> 0.0.0.0:80
> >> No listening sockets available, shutting down
> >> Unable to open logs
> >> Note the errosr or messages above, and press the <ESC> key to exit.
> >>
> >> Thanks for replying, btw!
> >>
> >>
> >> "rahi" <rahi@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:3942854B-1DAE-465D-98B1-0FA7453DC463@microsoft.com...
> >> > Check if MS defender has something to do with it, so disable it for a
> >> > test.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Try, learn, experience.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "Skybase" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I know it's still beta, but anyone know of an http server that works
> >> >> in
> >> >> Vista currently? I love using Vista and am reporting any bugs I find
> >> >> however
> >> >> I normally have an apache http server running for a webpage that I
> >> >> have.
> >> >> I'm unable to get it to work in Vista. . .seems to install properly
> >> >> from
> >> >> what I can tell, but can't get it to load up. Errors with ports.
> >> >> ...firewalls' not enabled in Vista either. . .so. .shouldn't be a
> >> >> problem?
> >> >> (works fine on my winXP boot)
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks in advance!
> >> >>
> >>
>