PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows Vista
Windows Vista Performance
xp pro and vista
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows Vista
Windows Vista Performance
xp pro and vista
![]() |
xp pro and vista |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi can any one comment on vista 5808 with installation of xp pro with
regards to size of the ram? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
OK I think I know what you mean...
XP: minimum RAM is 128MB but runs ideally with 512MB or more. Vista 5308: minimum RAM is 512MB but runs ideally with 768MB or more. Vista Final: minimum RAM is 512MB but runs ideally with 1GB or more. Not entirely final, but that's a "thereabouts" pointer for you )-- Zack Whittaker » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared that up! --- Original message follows --- "Tckg" <tckg32@pacific.net.sg> wrote in message news:%23Z6NDT4RGHA.4688@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > hi can any one comment on vista 5808 with installation of xp pro with > regards to size of the ram? > |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Put it this way, anything below 512 is not recommended.
-- -- Andre Windows Connect | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta "Tckg" <tckg32@pacific.net.sg> wrote in message news:%23Z6NDT4RGHA.4688@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > hi can any one comment on vista 5808 with installation of xp pro with > regards to size of the ram? > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I've got a machine on 256MB mind you Andre... that runs pretty well still
with a whole load of things disabled... even Glass works just as well as the AMD dual core in the next room! But yeh, anything less than 512MB is not at all recommended... unless you're prepared for a slow computer! -- Zack Whittaker » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared that up! --- Original message follows --- "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Optva5DSGHA.4456@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... > Put it this way, anything below 512 is not recommended. > -- > -- > Andre > Windows Connect | http://www.windowsconnected.com > Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com > Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre > http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta > > "Tckg" <tckg32@pacific.net.sg> wrote in message > news:%23Z6NDT4RGHA.4688@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... >> hi can any one comment on vista 5808 with installation of xp pro with >> regards to size of the ram? >> > > |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I've heard of some people that were unable to boot their Vista machine with
256MB of RAM and others that were. I'd recommend a minimum of 768MB for optimal performance, but 1GB+ is better. I'd use 512MB as a minimum. "Zack Whittaker (R2 Mentor)" <admin@zacknet.co.uk> wrote in message news:eG5UsVESGHA.1728@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > I've got a machine on 256MB mind you Andre... that runs pretty well still > with a whole load of things disabled... even Glass works just as well as > the AMD dual core in the next room! > > But yeh, anything less than 512MB is not at all recommended... unless > you're prepared for a slow computer! > > -- > Zack Whittaker > » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk > » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org > » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk > » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no > rights. > All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my > employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared that > up! > > > --- Original message follows --- > "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:Optva5DSGHA.4456@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... >> Put it this way, anything below 512 is not recommended. >> -- >> -- >> Andre >> Windows Connect | http://www.windowsconnected.com >> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com >> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre >> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta >> >> "Tckg" <tckg32@pacific.net.sg> wrote in message >> news:%23Z6NDT4RGHA.4688@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... >>> hi can any one comment on vista 5808 with installation of xp pro with >>> regards to size of the ram? >>> >> >> > > |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yeh I'd agree with that. I've got an AMD Dual Core in the next room with 1GB
of RAM and another with 1.5GB RAM, they both run pretty well but after the April CTP (Beta 2), performance will be optimised so much better so that 512MB will be "OK" and anything less will be "not so good" )-- Zack Whittaker » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared that up! --- Original message follows --- "Travis King" <Anonymous@none.com> wrote in message news:OQBVWhGSGHA.6084@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... > I've heard of some people that were unable to boot their Vista machine > with 256MB of RAM and others that were. I'd recommend a minimum of 768MB > for optimal performance, but 1GB+ is better. I'd use 512MB as a minimum. > "Zack Whittaker (R2 Mentor)" <admin@zacknet.co.uk> wrote in message > news:eG5UsVESGHA.1728@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... >> I've got a machine on 256MB mind you Andre... that runs pretty well still >> with a whole load of things disabled... even Glass works just as well as >> the AMD dual core in the next room! >> >> But yeh, anything less than 512MB is not at all recommended... unless >> you're prepared for a slow computer! >> >> -- >> Zack Whittaker >> » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk >> » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org >> » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk >> » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no >> rights. >> All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of >> my >> employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared that >> up! >> >> >> --- Original message follows --- >> "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:Optva5DSGHA.4456@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... >>> Put it this way, anything below 512 is not recommended. >>> -- >>> -- >>> Andre >>> Windows Connect | http://www.windowsconnected.com >>> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com >>> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre >>> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta >>> >>> "Tckg" <tckg32@pacific.net.sg> wrote in message >>> news:%23Z6NDT4RGHA.4688@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... >>>> hi can any one comment on vista 5808 with installation of xp pro with >>>> regards to size of the ram? >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes, but you had to disable so many things, essential things to make it
usable. The majority of consumers or businesses planning to upgrade are probably not gonna do that. -- -- Andre Windows Connect | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta "Zack Whittaker (R2 Mentor)" <admin@zacknet.co.uk> wrote in message news:eG5UsVESGHA.1728@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > I've got a machine on 256MB mind you Andre... that runs pretty well still > with a whole load of things disabled... even Glass works just as well as > the AMD dual core in the next room! > > But yeh, anything less than 512MB is not at all recommended... unless > you're prepared for a slow computer! > > -- > Zack Whittaker > » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk > » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org > » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk > » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no > rights. > All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my > employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared that > up! > > > --- Original message follows --- > "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:Optva5DSGHA.4456@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... >> Put it this way, anything below 512 is not recommended. >> -- >> -- >> Andre >> Windows Connect | http://www.windowsconnected.com >> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com >> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre >> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta >> >> "Tckg" <tckg32@pacific.net.sg> wrote in message >> news:%23Z6NDT4RGHA.4688@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... >>> hi can any one comment on vista 5808 with installation of xp pro with >>> regards to size of the ram? >>> >> >> > > |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
the problems arise when you have it fully loaded with applications...
XP at least gets bogged down if you have too many applications installed. There were rumors that vista would fix that problem... I dont see how though.... -- Kenny - www.ComputerBoom.com Take a look at my site! A World Full of Wonders... If you can imagine it, it is possible. -- "Zack Whittaker (R2 Mentor)" <admin@zacknet.co.uk> wrote in message news:eG5UsVESGHA.1728@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > I've got a machine on 256MB mind you Andre... that runs pretty well still > with a whole load of things disabled... even Glass works just as well as > the AMD dual core in the next room! > > But yeh, anything less than 512MB is not at all recommended... unless > you're prepared for a slow computer! > > -- > Zack Whittaker > » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk > » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org > » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk > » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no > rights. > All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not of my > employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared that > up! > > > --- Original message follows --- > "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:Optva5DSGHA.4456@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... >> Put it this way, anything below 512 is not recommended. >> -- >> -- >> Andre >> Windows Connect | http://www.windowsconnected.com >> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com >> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre >> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta >> >> "Tckg" <tckg32@pacific.net.sg> wrote in message >> news:%23Z6NDT4RGHA.4688@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... >>> hi can any one comment on vista 5808 with installation of xp pro with >>> regards to size of the ram? >>> >> >> > > |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
When the 5808 will be out if at all then I can comment on it. Right now all I can do is comment on the 5308 release
-- Peter Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged. "Tckg" <tckg32@pacific.net.sg> wrote in message news:%23Z6NDT4RGHA.4688@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > hi can any one comment on vista 5808 with installation of xp pro with > regards to size of the ram? > > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

)
