PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows Vista
Windows Vista General Discussion
Screen resolution
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows Vista
Windows Vista General Discussion
Screen resolution
![]() |
Screen resolution |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am using a 19" Flat screen monitor and I usually run the resolution at
1024 x 768, whenever I wish to change the resolution the onscreen picture does not fit my screen, it is either too small or it overlaps my screen. I can get round this by pressing the auto adjust button on my monitor, but when I reboot my pc the screen defaults to the smaller/larger resolution. How do I stop this from happening? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
try a different refresh rate
"T5" <noanswer@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:306AA64A-F4CC-48BC-8575-351DC2605A10@microsoft.com... >I am using a 19" Flat screen monitor and I usually run the resolution at >1024 x 768, whenever I wish to change the resolution the onscreen picture >does not fit my screen, it is either too small or it overlaps my screen. > > I can get round this by pressing the auto adjust button on my monitor, but > when I reboot my pc the screen defaults to the smaller/larger resolution. > How do I stop this from happening? > > |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thx Jim sorted
Changed refresh from 75mhz to 60mhz and it stays put T5 "BigJim" <bigjim@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:J6ydnTIZuNxmo3jYnZ2dnUVZ_v6tnZ2d@comcast.com... > try a different refresh rate > "T5" <noanswer@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:306AA64A-F4CC-48BC-8575-351DC2605A10@microsoft.com... >>I am using a 19" Flat screen monitor and I usually run the resolution at >>1024 x 768, whenever I wish to change the resolution the onscreen picture >>does not fit my screen, it is either too small or it overlaps my screen. >> >> I can get round this by pressing the auto adjust button on my monitor, >> but when I reboot my pc the screen defaults to the smaller/larger >> resolution. How do I stop this from happening? >> >> > > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> Changed refresh from 75mhz to 60mhz and it stays put
> That would be Hz not MHz. With decent flat panels you shouldn't need to drop down to 60 Hz -- perhaps to 70 or 72. The thing with 60 Hz is that you may get to deal with interaction with lights in the room (as the AC current is also at 60 Hz) which can cause fatigue and headaches over time. -- Barry Schnur |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"BSchnur" <BSchnur@cox.net> wrote in message news:MPG.204f9a0cd258d3ee989845@msnews.microsoft.com... >> Changed refresh from 75mhz to 60mhz and it stays put >> > That would be Hz not MHz. > > With decent flat panels you shouldn't need to drop down to 60 Hz -- > perhaps to 70 or 72. The thing with 60 Hz is that you may get to deal > with interaction with lights in the room (as the AC current is also at > 60 Hz) which can cause fatigue and headaches over time. > I thought that was only an issue CRTs not with LCD panels, since the screen doesn't really "refresh" the same. The pixels on an LCD stay on continuously, they only change state / color during the next refresh cycle. The only real issue with this is that you get streaking / ghosting of moving images because of the latency. Regards, Dave |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes it is much more of a problem with CRT's -- I believe it is still an
issue (perhaps minor) with LCD's. The thing is, I run my panels at 70Hz or 75Hz uniformly. With LCD's the display is configured to be optimized at maximum resolution and matching refresh. A max refresh rate of 60Hz to me suggests there is a mismatch of the card or display. -- Barry Schnur |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"BSchnur" <BSchnur@cox.net> wrote in message news:MPG.2050b42e30b3c3ea98984e@msnews.microsoft.com... > Yes it is much more of a problem with CRT's -- I believe it is still > an > issue (perhaps minor) with LCD's. The thing is, I run my panels at > 70Hz or 75Hz uniformly. With LCD's the display is configured to be > optimized at maximum resolution and matching refresh. A max refresh > rate of 60Hz to me suggests there is a mismatch of the card or > display. > Not necessarily. Many older LCDs had response times around 25ms - slow enough that 60hz was plenty and using a faster refresh rate didn't give any benefit. 60hz translates to about 17ms response time, 70hz is about 14ms, and 75 is about 13ms. The fastest LCDs today are around 8ms which would be around 120hz, but there are other limitations that affect it. Check out http://www.tweakguides.com/Graphics_8.html for a nice discussion on this topic. Regards, Dave |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Fair enough -- on the relatively old (but very nice) Samsung 171T I'm
using at the moment, at 1280x1024 the max refresh rate for me is 70Hz. On a number of the 15 inch LCD's where the max resolution is 1024x768, I'm running at 75Hz, but I have one where the top refresh is 70Hz. I've not encountered a top rate of 60Hz on any of the LCD's I've used and deployed over the past two or three years though. -- Barry Schnur |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

