PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows Vista
Windows Vista General Discussion
Re: System Restore in Vista in multiboot situations with XP
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows Vista
Windows Vista General Discussion
Re: System Restore in Vista in multiboot situations with XP
![]() |
Re: System Restore in Vista in multiboot situations with XP |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It is not a severe limitation in Vista. Vista is just fine on this point.
It is an XP issue. It is incompatibility between XP's Volume Shadowcopy Services and Vistas's. The fix involves an expensive rewrite to XP that MS states cannot be justified considering the tiny fraction of the Windows user base that multi-boots. MS has made the decision not to do the rewrite of XP. MS has been looking at the issue for at least two years. We discussed it in TechBeta for the last year and a half. The incompatibility results from improvements to VSS in Vista and new VSS features, such as Previous Versions. As Michael says, the solution is to hide Vista from XP. A third party boot manager is the only general solution (covering all editions of Vista) at the moment. My favorite solution is not to multi-boot with XP and Vista on a production or primary home computer. If you are having hardware driver issues such that you sometimes need to boot into a legacy system to use a device, then at least make that legacy system Win2K if you can. Win2K does not have VSS. If it involves software incompatibilities with Vista, then perhaps running XP in a virtual machine with VPC 2007 beta on Vista will solve this for you. The folks who do VistaBoot Pro may be able to add a drive-hiding feature in a future release. At least they were receptive to the suggestion since it would solve some other issues as well. It would be helpful if you and others concerned with this issue go to thier forum and add your comments to the thread already started there. http://www.pro-networks.org/forum/about86248.html The only mode you can boot into with XP and not harm files created with the Vista VSS driver is Safe Mode. The XP VSS driver does not run in Safe Mode. "Edwin" <edwin@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:C9AEA983-C6C4-4F52-92B7-428A71FCFD0C@microsoft.com... > In the pre-release versions of Vista, System Restore has a severe > limitation > in a multiboot situation with XP. When one boots into XP and then > subsequently boots into Vista, all previous Vista restore points are no > longer there. > > Has a remedy for this been found and implemented in the release versions > of > Vista? If not, is there any hope of a remedy by means of a future Windows > Update? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There will not be a huge increase in dual-booters. 95% of Windows are sold
preinstalled on new computers. The current user base cares nothing about such things as dual booting and will either stick with XP for awhile or buy Vista in software/hardware package deals. In any case, most of the dual-booters will probably be folks who frequent newsgroups like this one. Outside of us geeks hardly anybody knows they can even do it (and cares less). The upgraders may not be able to dual boot without a second license of XP if the Vista Upgrade Editions overwrite the XP partition and tie the license to Vista as I think it does. It may be just the way the Upgrade Editions work. Those who buy a full Vista edition will have no problem. If you can see the volume (drive letter) you installed Vista on in My Computer while running XP, that drive is not hidden. "Edwin" <edwin@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:A56C415E-D385-48A6-BB70-761F5088CAAD@microsoft.com... > Thanks for the detailed reply. Here are a few comments and a few more > questions: > > 1) Windows users who multiboot may be a "tiny fraction" at present but I > predict that there will be a sharp increase due to the huge amount of > legacy > hardware out there (scanners, printers, fax machines etc.) that will never > be > updated by their manufacturers with Vista-compatible drivers. I think > there > will be many Vista users who will want to boot into XP to use some of > their > devices. If an easy solution is not found, these legions will probably > stay > with XP for several more years before giving up their legacy devices. This > happened with Me and 98 users during the first 2-3 years of XP and it > could > happen again with Vista. > > 2) I do not understand (because of my tech limitations) what is meant by > hiding Vista from XP with a boot manager (I do use VistaBoot Pro). Please > explain how Vista is "hidden" but still "shows" in the boot menu so that > multiboot is possible. > > 3) I will take your suggestion and enter the VistaBoot Pro forum. If they > provide a work-around in their software, that would be the best solution > for > me because I have my own reasons for wanting to maintain a Vista-XP > multiboot > on my computer. > > Thanks again! -Edwin > > > > "Colin Barnhorst" wrote: > >> It is not a severe limitation in Vista. Vista is just fine on this >> point. >> It is an XP issue. It is incompatibility between XP's Volume Shadowcopy >> Services and Vistas's. The fix involves an expensive rewrite to XP that >> MS >> states cannot be justified considering the tiny fraction of the Windows >> user >> base that multi-boots. MS has made the decision not to do the rewrite of >> XP. MS has been looking at the issue for at least two years. We >> discussed >> it in TechBeta for the last year and a half. The incompatibility results >> from improvements to VSS in Vista and new VSS features, such as Previous >> Versions. >> >> As Michael says, the solution is to hide Vista from XP. A third party >> boot >> manager is the only general solution (covering all editions of Vista) at >> the >> moment. >> >> My favorite solution is not to multi-boot with XP and Vista on a >> production >> or primary home computer. If you are having hardware driver issues such >> that you sometimes need to boot into a legacy system to use a device, >> then >> at least make that legacy system Win2K if you can. Win2K does not have >> VSS. >> If it involves software incompatibilities with Vista, then perhaps >> running >> XP in a virtual machine with VPC 2007 beta on Vista will solve this for >> you. >> >> The folks who do VistaBoot Pro may be able to add a drive-hiding feature >> in >> a future release. At least they were receptive to the suggestion since >> it >> would solve some other issues as well. It would be helpful if you and >> others concerned with this issue go to thier forum and add your comments >> to >> the thread already started there. >> http://www.pro-networks.org/forum/about86248.html >> >> The only mode you can boot into with XP and not harm files created with >> the >> Vista VSS driver is Safe Mode. The XP VSS driver does not run in Safe >> Mode. >> >> "Edwin" <edwin@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:C9AEA983-C6C4-4F52-92B7-428A71FCFD0C@microsoft.com... >> > In the pre-release versions of Vista, System Restore has a severe >> > limitation >> > in a multiboot situation with XP. When one boots into XP and then >> > subsequently boots into Vista, all previous Vista restore points are no >> > longer there. >> > >> > Has a remedy for this been found and implemented in the release >> > versions >> > of >> > Vista? If not, is there any hope of a remedy by means of a future >> > Windows >> > Update? >> >> |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

