PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows Vista
Windows Vista General Discussion
Vista & XP on same C:\
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows Vista
Windows Vista General Discussion
Vista & XP on same C:\
![]() |
Vista & XP on same C:\ |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
did anyone tryed installing Vista and XP on same drive? would something like
C:\Windows C:\Program Files and C:\Documents and Settings conflict between XP and VISTA? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Not recommended, at the least they should be on separate volumes/partitions
on the same physical drive. -- Best of Luck, Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ Windows help - www.rickrogers.org "unknown" <someone@mydomain.com> wrote in message news:172302AE-E866-4E14-8D28-BA20D47F3F85@microsoft.com... > did anyone tryed installing Vista and XP on same drive? would something > like C:\Windows C:\Program Files and C:\Documents and Settings conflict > between XP and VISTA? > > |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Unknown--
A whole lot of things would conflict if you don't put them on a separate partition or at least folder. Give Vista a clean install on another new partition or drive and avoid a number of problems. Vista's Users is more than just a name different that Documents and Settings in XP. If you like, you can easily dual boot Vista and XP on the same hard drive and that will work fine and you can access the XP desktop from the Vista desktop with a shortcut that would be C:\Documents and Settings\Unknown's Profile\Desktop. CH "unknown" <someone@mydomain.com> wrote in message news:172302AE-E866-4E14-8D28-BA20D47F3F85@microsoft.com... > did anyone tryed installing Vista and XP on same drive? would something > like C:\Windows C:\Program Files and C:\Documents and Settings conflict > between XP and VISTA? > > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Known. It will overwrite XP. XP and Vista can be on the same drive but not
in the same partition. You may see C: when you are in each OS, but they will not be referring to the same physical partition. Each may see its own partition as the C: drive when running. "Chad Harris" <GreenzoneistoIraqlikeOlivegardentoItaly@lol.net> wrote in message news:uVJk3zOkGHA.1640@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Unknown-- > > > A whole lot of things would conflict if you don't put them on a separate > partition or at least folder. Give Vista a clean install on another new > partition or drive and avoid a number of problems. Vista's Users is more > than just a name different that Documents and Settings in XP. If you > like, you can easily dual boot Vista and XP on the same hard drive and > that will work fine and you can access the XP desktop from the Vista > desktop with a shortcut that would be C:\Documents and Settings\Unknown's > Profile\Desktop. > > CH > > > > "unknown" <someone@mydomain.com> wrote in message > news:172302AE-E866-4E14-8D28-BA20D47F3F85@microsoft.com... >> did anyone tryed installing Vista and XP on same drive? would something >> like C:\Windows C:\Program Files and C:\Documents and Settings conflict >> between XP and VISTA? >> >> > > |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have actually done that, I installed an earlier release of Vista in the
same partition as XP. But if you wish to delete Vista from the XP partition, you can have a lot of problems with permissions and protected operating system files. Not recommended. "unknown" <someone@mydomain.com> wrote in message news:172302AE-E866-4E14-8D28-BA20D47F3F85@microsoft.com... > did anyone tryed installing Vista and XP on same drive? would something > like C:\Windows C:\Program Files and C:\Documents and Settings conflict > between XP and VISTA? > > |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It is never a good idea to install two operating systems on the same
partition. It is guaranteed to give you trouble and slim to no chance of both OS's booting and working properly. It's called a parallel install and is only ever done for data backup purposes when you cannot boot to a desktop in the original OS, and usually ends up with an unstable system, broken software pointers, etc etc etc On top of that, it would be pretty frustrating to try to rip one OS off the drive leaving the other intact. "unknown" <someone@mydomain.com> wrote in message news:172302AE-E866-4E14-8D28-BA20D47F3F85@microsoft.com... > did anyone tryed installing Vista and XP on same drive? would something > like C:\Windows C:\Program Files and C:\Documents and Settings conflict > between XP and VISTA? > > |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
>I have actually done that, I installed an earlier release of Vista in the
>same partition as XP. But if you wish to delete Vista from the XP >partition, you can have a lot of problems with permissions and protected >operating system files. Not recommended. Even if you can get it to work, it's not a scenario supported by MS...in other words, if it screws something up (and it probably will sooner rather than later), you're on your own. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
LOL Homer "On your Own" is English for MSFT. That puts a huge smile on my face. It's a beta and a lot doesn't work and although these groups will help, you're on you're own lol anyway. When Vista RTMS, XP is now the support provided to the public who are not part of an enterprise is outsourced to India by the cheapest possible contract MSFT has been able to buy so they aren't involved. It's Convergys of Ohio in India whose trademarks are 1) they can't speak intelligible English 2) Most of them would do well finding the start button if it were magnified 150 X on a good day. I know you meant this to be even funnier than the Homer J. Simpson comic strips didn't you? "On your own" Like what the hell is the definition of "not on your own with MFST." Reparations for SFC not working? Reparations because SR won't manufacture restore points when it should? Reparations because the Volume Shadow service has not been configured to maintain Vista Restore Points when someone goes to an XP booot on a dual or multiboot--which is not just a Beta phenomenon any more? If we're not "on our own" can you please show me any comprehensive documentation where MSFT has lifted a finger to put anything on their site on the major modality to fix Vista Windows RE? Do you see any documentation on System Restore which btw can be reached outside of Windows via Win RE but has not been mentioned in this context once by anyone helping on this group because they don't know how or where to find out what Win RE is in depth? Beam up all the links for documentation on Vista SFC that can destroy your registry, Vista System Restore, and Windows Repair Environment since Homer, lol MSFT doesn't have Homer on his own!!! CH "Homer J. Simpson" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:uZRIHbVkGHA.4444@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > >I have actually done that, I installed an earlier release of Vista in the > >same partition as XP. But if you wish to delete Vista from the XP > >partition, you can have a lot of problems with permissions and protected > >operating system files. Not recommended. > > Even if you can get it to work, it's not a scenario supported by MS...in > other words, if it screws something up (and it probably will sooner rather > than later), you're on your own. > > |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
i did two OSes on the same partitions once. day by day a t=drive or a port
would stop working on one OS or another to the point were every port or drive stopped working but i fixed it. it was an interesting experience. "Chad Harris" <GreenzoneistoIraqlikeOlivegardentoItaly@lol.net> wrote in message news:eN0xPPakGHA.1456@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > LOL Homer "On your Own" is English for MSFT. That puts a huge smile on > my face. > > It's a beta and a lot doesn't work and although these groups will help, > you're on you're own lol anyway. When Vista RTMS, XP is now the support > provided to the public who are not part of an enterprise is outsourced to > India by the cheapest possible contract MSFT has been able to buy so they > aren't involved. It's Convergys of Ohio in India whose trademarks are 1) > they can't speak intelligible English 2) Most of them would do well > finding the start button if it were magnified 150 X on a good day. > > I know you meant this to be even funnier than the Homer J. Simpson comic > strips didn't you? > > "On your own" Like what the hell is the definition of "not on your own > with MFST." Reparations for SFC not working? Reparations because SR won't > manufacture restore points when it should? Reparations because the Volume > Shadow service has not been configured to maintain Vista Restore Points > when someone goes to an XP booot on a dual or multiboot--which is not just > a Beta phenomenon any more? > > If we're not "on our own" can you please show me any comprehensive > documentation where MSFT has lifted a finger to put anything on their > site on the major modality to fix Vista Windows RE? Do you see any > documentation on System Restore which btw can be reached outside of > Windows via Win RE but has not been mentioned in this context once by > anyone helping on this group because they don't know how or where to find > out what Win RE is in depth? > > Beam up all the links for documentation on Vista SFC that can destroy your > registry, Vista System Restore, and Windows Repair Environment since > Homer, lol MSFT doesn't have Homer on his own!!! > > CH > > > > > > "Homer J. Simpson" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message > news:uZRIHbVkGHA.4444@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> >I have actually done that, I installed an earlier release of Vista in >> >the same partition as XP. But if you wish to delete Vista from the XP >> >partition, you can have a lot of problems with permissions and protected >> >operating system files. Not recommended. >> >> Even if you can get it to work, it's not a scenario supported by MS...in >> other words, if it screws something up (and it probably will sooner >> rather than later), you're on your own. >> >> > > |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I understand some people wanting to push the envelop--and I always get a
kick out of people who do, and its interesting when they succeed. There are a subset of Windows enthusiasts, Mac lovers, and Linux devotees who try to see how they can run different software on considerably older hardware and what performance they can get out of the hardware. Often these same users also own cutting edge hardware, and they do this because they just love tinkering and they enjoy the challenges. To me that's one interesting thing to do, But if you're going to take a Beta part way throughj its course to RTM, like Vista 5384.4 (B2), I'd at least give it a clean install in its own space so that it can have a reasonable chance to perform as well as it can at the current point in time when you try it. You'll find enough interesting things you'd like fixed or changed without risking mixing it up with XP. CH "Steven Wabik" <Stevenw45@comcast.net> wrote in message news:eE4ckVbkGHA.1260@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >i did two OSes on the same partitions once. day by day a t=drive or a port >would stop working on one OS or another to the point were every port or >drive stopped working but i fixed it. it was an interesting experience. > "Chad Harris" <GreenzoneistoIraqlikeOlivegardentoItaly@lol.net> wrote in > message news:eN0xPPakGHA.1456@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> >> LOL Homer "On your Own" is English for MSFT. That puts a huge smile on >> my face. >> >> It's a beta and a lot doesn't work and although these groups will help, >> you're on you're own lol anyway. When Vista RTMS, XP is now the support >> provided to the public who are not part of an enterprise is outsourced to >> India by the cheapest possible contract MSFT has been able to buy so they >> aren't involved. It's Convergys of Ohio in India whose trademarks are 1) >> they can't speak intelligible English 2) Most of them would do well >> finding the start button if it were magnified 150 X on a good day. >> >> I know you meant this to be even funnier than the Homer J. Simpson comic >> strips didn't you? >> >> "On your own" Like what the hell is the definition of "not on your own >> with MFST." Reparations for SFC not working? Reparations because SR >> won't manufacture restore points when it should? Reparations because the >> Volume Shadow service has not been configured to maintain Vista Restore >> Points when someone goes to an XP booot on a dual or multiboot--which is >> not just a Beta phenomenon any more? >> >> If we're not "on our own" can you please show me any comprehensive >> documentation where MSFT has lifted a finger to put anything on their >> site on the major modality to fix Vista Windows RE? Do you see any >> documentation on System Restore which btw can be reached outside of >> Windows via Win RE but has not been mentioned in this context once by >> anyone helping on this group because they don't know how or where to find >> out what Win RE is in depth? >> >> Beam up all the links for documentation on Vista SFC that can destroy >> your registry, Vista System Restore, and Windows Repair Environment since >> Homer, lol MSFT doesn't have Homer on his own!!! >> >> CH >> >> >> >> >> >> "Homer J. Simpson" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message >> news:uZRIHbVkGHA.4444@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>> >I have actually done that, I installed an earlier release of Vista in >>> >the same partition as XP. But if you wish to delete Vista from the XP >>> >partition, you can have a lot of problems with permissions and >>> >protected operating system files. Not recommended. >>> >>> Even if you can get it to work, it's not a scenario supported by MS...in >>> other words, if it screws something up (and it probably will sooner >>> rather than later), you're on your own. >>> >>> >> >> > > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

