PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft Outlook
Microsoft Outlook Calendar
repeated meeting changed after some meetings were deleted.
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft Outlook
Microsoft Outlook Calendar
repeated meeting changed after some meetings were deleted.
![]() |
repeated meeting changed after some meetings were deleted. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Please help!
1. In my Outlook 2003 I had programmed a repeated meeting - daily at 9.00 - 1 hour long - no final date. 2. 1 week later (as 7 meetings already took place) I had manually DELETED THREE future meetings (meetings number 9, 10 and 11). 3. 20 meetings after the first programming step I decided to define the final date of the meetings' series (changing the "no final date defined" option to "stop after 30 occasions"). 4. Outlook accepted the change, but also RESURRECTED THOSE 3 meetings, which were deleted. What can I do to prevent Outlook 2003 from resurrecting those manually deleted meetings? Thank you. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
kartabella <kartabella@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> 1. In my Outlook 2003 I had programmed a repeated meeting - daily at > 9.00 - 1 hour long - no final date. > 2. 1 week later (as 7 meetings already took place) I had manually > DELETED THREE future meetings (meetings number 9, 10 and 11). > 3. 20 meetings after the first programming step I decided to define > the final date of the meetings' series (changing the "no final date > defined" option to "stop after 30 occasions"). > 4. Outlook accepted the change, but also RESURRECTED THOSE 3 > meetings, which were deleted. > > What can I do to prevent Outlook 2003 from resurrecting those manually > deleted meetings? Since recurring events are single entries in the calendar, with events subsequent to the original being calculated and not actually stored. When you modify a particular occurrence, you are storing an exception in the event record that Outlook uses to suppress or alter that particular occurrence. You're not actually removing an item from the calendar, since there is only one item for the entire series. By changing the end date you're modifying the series and Outlook regenerates all occurrences, eliminating any of the exceptions in the record. You cannot prevent it. -- Brian Tillman |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Sue Stubbs <Sue Stubbs@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> I believe that this is a serious flaw in Outlook's Calendar. It's > outrageous that one cannot change a recurring event just going > forward, while leaving the history intact. An early version of Palm's > calendar which I used years ago was more sophisticated than this! > Every time you modified a recurring event, a screen popped up asking > whether you wanted to change all occurrences, all future occurrences, > or just one occurrence. I've used calendaring systems like that as well. > Don't the Microsoft people understand that the vast majority of times > that one would change the time or place of a recurring event, that > one would be making that change for the future, not the past? It's hard to tell wha Microsoft people understand and don't understand without asking them, but it seems reasonable to me that one might want to change a recurring event without changing past history. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have been searching for a solution to his myself for quite some time. I'm
disappointed to see that when I change the time of a meeting to 8:30 a.m. from 9:30 a.m. GOING FORWARD ONLY... that all the previous meetings will change, too. Even though the previous meetings occurred at 9:30 a.m. "kartabella" wrote: > Please help! > 1. In my Outlook 2003 I had programmed a repeated meeting - daily at 9.00 - > 1 hour long - no final date. > 2. 1 week later (as 7 meetings already took place) I had manually DELETED > THREE future meetings (meetings number 9, 10 and 11). > 3. 20 meetings after the first programming step I decided to define the final > date of the meetings' series (changing the "no final date defined" option to > "stop after 30 occasions"). > 4. Outlook accepted the change, but also RESURRECTED THOSE 3 meetings, which > were deleted. > > What can I do to prevent Outlook 2003 from resurrecting those manually > deleted meetings? > Thank you. > |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think I may have found a solution. I pulled up the recurring meeting and
changed the "end date" to this week. I then "sent update." I set up a new meeting beginning next week with the new time. It looks like the old meetings are still there w/ the original time and the new invite beginning next week w/ the new time. Does this sound like it will work for any of you? "nkb" wrote: > I have been searching for a solution to his myself for quite some time. I'm > disappointed to see that when I change the time of a meeting to 8:30 a.m. > from 9:30 a.m. GOING FORWARD ONLY... that all the previous meetings will > change, too. Even though the previous meetings occurred at 9:30 a.m. > > > "kartabella" wrote: > > > Please help! > > 1. In my Outlook 2003 I had programmed a repeated meeting - daily at 9.00 - > > 1 hour long - no final date. > > 2. 1 week later (as 7 meetings already took place) I had manually DELETED > > THREE future meetings (meetings number 9, 10 and 11). > > 3. 20 meetings after the first programming step I decided to define the final > > date of the meetings' series (changing the "no final date defined" option to > > "stop after 30 occasions"). > > 4. Outlook accepted the change, but also RESURRECTED THOSE 3 meetings, which > > were deleted. > > > > What can I do to prevent Outlook 2003 from resurrecting those manually > > deleted meetings? > > Thank you. > > |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
nkb <nkb@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> I think I may have found a solution. I pulled up the recurring > meeting and changed the "end date" to this week. I then "sent > update." I set up a new meeting beginning next week with the new > time. It looks like the old meetings are still there w/ the original > time and the new invite beginning next week w/ the new time. > > Does this sound like it will work for any of you? As you discovered, recurring entries are single entries, not multiple ones, and changing a recurring entry in such a way that Outlook will regenerate it will change both the past and future display (since it's really only one item). I think you've found the best solution. -- Brian Tillman |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

