PC Review Forums Software Windows Vista & Applications My Vista Experience So Far

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 17-02-2007, 05:00 PM   #1
DigitalDoctorTech01
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tullahoma, TN
Posts: 42
Trader Rating: (0)
Default My Vista Experience So Far

Hello Everyone!

Well, I just had my first real in-depth experience with Vista, and so far, I must say I am really Impressed!

One of our customers has just bought one of the new HP's with Vista Home Premium Pre-Installed.

I started going through, doing the usual things we do for customers with a new pc. The Mini-Setup was very aesthetically pleasing, and easy. I really Enjoy not having to do that freaking online activation anymore as it does it automatically if it can connect to one of M$'s servers.

A few things have changed and I'm sure the changes will be accepted by most but ridiculed by some as well, change isn't always easy.

Most of our anti-virus and anti-malware programs worked, with the exception of AVG Anti-Spyware. However, Spybot S&D works fine, including Adaware SE and AVG 7.5 Free, and of course windows defender is now integrated so i don't have to install it anymore!

The Hard Disk Defragment Utility can no longer be accessed through the manage option when you right-click “ (My) Computer” You must go to start->applications->system tools->defragment to run the utility, although this might not be necessary for most people since the defragmenter is automatically scheduled to run once a week and also defragments while the pc is in standby. The colored (coloured for you English folk) graph that shows the degree of disk fragmentation, though interesting to watch (LOL) has been deemed unnecessary by M$ and is therefore removed.

The Visuals are truly amazing and while some people complain about it being unnecessary “eye Candy” if you look at something over and over again every day for hours at a time you kind of appreciate a little “flashiness” after awhile.

Contrary to some people who claim vista is a “little tykes mod of windows XP” This version of windows is totally different in areas of security, ease of use, and features.
To install and run some applications the user is prompted to accept the program much like in versions of Linux. The windows update is embedded in the Operating system not the Internet Explorer Browser! Vista Prevents harmful changes to the registry by using a “Virtual Registry” that programs can access and change without messing up the original registry.
I will really enjoy Vista's ability to be cloned onto different hardware without hal errors or using special software to get around such errors like Acronis Universal Restore, since that will cut down install time here at the repair shop.

I think this is the most secure, best looking, and easiest to use OS produced by Microsoft.
DigitalDoctorTech01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-02-2007, 05:20 PM   #2
Adywebb
Captain Boinc
Super Moderator
 
Adywebb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 5,142
Trader Rating: (4)
Default

I tend to agree with you, although it costs way too much for me to justify buying it when XP does fine for me at the moment - I will be waiting for a while I suspect.

Meanwhile various Linux distros have become much more user friendly recently so I may just switch over to Linux - who knows?

May be interesting too if Apple make their OS available for general use in the future as suspected - could make for interesting competition
__________________
Registered Linux User # 406829 ... Registered Insane Linux User # 002


Adywebb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-02-2007, 05:34 PM   #3
feckit
Hmmm Crunching
 
feckit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London ~ England
Posts: 5,600
Trader Rating: (0)
Default

I do like the look of Vista, but not the price.
But with XP being supported for a few more years will stay with it.
Always unsure of a new O/S until at least the 1st Service Pack is released, in Vista's case in the summer.
__________________
Registered Microsoft User # 29864751 ... Registered Insane Microsoft User # 19,947,365
For the party of the people go to OMRLP

feckit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-02-2007, 06:08 PM   #4
Alf
Yank Upstart
 
Alf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,657
Trader Rating: (0)
Default

It looks good, nodouting that. But general reviews say Vistas not 'the gaming OS' microsoft was touting it to be. with vista actually getting less fps in games than XP.
I think i'll pass for now
__________________
I'll Smash you Good!
Alf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-02-2007, 09:24 AM   #5
floppybootstomp
sugar 'n spikes
Super Moderator
 
floppybootstomp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Greenwich
Posts: 9,887
Send a message via ICQ to floppybootstomp Send a message via MSN to floppybootstomp Send a message via Yahoo to floppybootstomp
Trader Rating: (13)
Default

So how much is Bill Gates paying you then?

It's resource hungry; won't play some games, is bloated and restricts the things you can do, like messing with the registry.

If you want Microsoft to completely run your computer and give you no say in your settings, go ahead and run Vista.

Myself, I'm getting familiar with Suse 10.2 now and will keep XP as long as I can, mostly for Gaming and, I must admit, ease of use. Although Suse 10.2 is coming very close to be equal for ease of use once it's set up.

I figure XP will be good for about 3 to 5 years and by then, hopefully, Linux will be even easier to use.

As a sidenote, I looked at the different versions of Vista and the only one worth having, in my opinion, is Ultimate (and for me, the 64 bit version). The OEM version costs around £130.00 including postage and isn’t too bad a price considering you get all the Media components.

But 7 years in the making and released with untold bugs? Not good enough.
__________________

Asus P5B Deluxe Motherboard; Intel Core 2 duo 6600 2.4Ghz CPU; Zalman CNPS9500 Cooler; 4Gb Corsair 6400C4 Memory; BFG Nvidia 9800 GTX 512Mb; 2 x Western Digital 74Gb Raptors in RAID 0; 2 x Hitachi SATA II 250Gb HDD; Antec 900 Gamers Case; Corsair 620W modular PSU; Asus Xonar D2X pci-e Sound Card; NEC SATA Lightscribe DVDRW; Asus SATA DVD-ROM; Linksys Wireless NIC; Logi G5 Mouse; Logi G15 Keyboard; Samsung 245_B 24" Black Monitor; Vista Home Premium 32 Bit.
floppybootstomp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-02-2007, 09:32 AM   #6
michael 118
Burndt Jamb
 
michael 118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chandlers ford
Posts: 1,589
Send a message via MSN to michael 118
Trader Rating: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alf
vista actually getting less fps in games than XP.
I think i'll pass for now



Very true. Expect to get anything between 5 - 50 fps reduction on Vista than you would on XP, regardless of hardware.

Yes, i'm a pass as well...

Maybe when Vista is cheaper, and everything is patched and updated, so it is acceptable enough.

Or...Maybe when pigs fly!
__________________
'Make Love and Revolution'

-------------------------------------------------------------------
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+ CPU | 2GB PC2-6400 DDR2 RAM | BFG 8800 GTS | Logitech MX518 Mouse | Yusmart monitor 19" 1280x1064 @ 75Hz | 500W Tagen PSU | The most Shiny Metal Case | 3 Fannin' Fans | a very flat keyboard | 5.1-ish surround sound | A User that is very pennyless!



michael 118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-02-2007, 08:25 PM   #7
MattM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London
Posts: 33
Trader Rating: (0)
Default

I'm going to pass for the time being too.

There has been a surge of interest recently, as there always is when MS release their 'new shiney' OS.
As with hardware i tend to wait at least 6months for the dust to settle around new stuff. With windows you find businesses run on autopilot and steam ahead having to own the very latest systems whatever the cost, because there must be in improvement ... right? ...
Ultimately its these businesses who pay for the privelidge to beta test the initial release and it is for those high-paying customers that MS actually start fixing the bugs uncovered. In 6months time I may get Vista in the knowledge that the majority of bugs have been ironed out at no expense to myself.
MattM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-02-2007, 09:46 PM   #8
michael 118
Burndt Jamb
 
michael 118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chandlers ford
Posts: 1,589
Send a message via MSN to michael 118
Trader Rating: (0)
Default

Yeah, i'll save my money and wait.

Probably the most wisest of options.
__________________
'Make Love and Revolution'

-------------------------------------------------------------------
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+ CPU | 2GB PC2-6400 DDR2 RAM | BFG 8800 GTS | Logitech MX518 Mouse | Yusmart monitor 19" 1280x1064 @ 75Hz | 500W Tagen PSU | The most Shiny Metal Case | 3 Fannin' Fans | a very flat keyboard | 5.1-ish surround sound | A User that is very pennyless!



michael 118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2007, 07:44 AM   #9
Osamede
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6
Trader Rating: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by floppybootstomp
If you want Microsoft to completely run your computer and give you no say in your settings, go ahead and run Vista.

Myself, I'm getting familiar with Suse 10.2 now and will keep XP as long as I can, mostly for Gaming and, I must admit, ease of use. Although Suse 10.2 is coming very close to be equal for ease of use once it's set up.

I figure XP will be good for about 3 to 5 years and by then, hopefully, Linux will be even easier to use.


I dont know though. These days the key trend is smartphones. More people are buying them and that is the way phones are going - they are becoming mini-computers.

However this has an implications for laptops and desktops too: you're less likely to use Linux when it doesnt sync easily or at all with your PIM data in Outlook, your music like and iphone etc.

Even though Limux itself is used on many smarthphones that brings no advantage as the linux phone OS's are not standardised or tuned to syncing either.

That is going to be the big drawback in getting a mass market audience for Linux. And I dont think 3-5 years will see that answered.
Osamede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2007, 09:27 PM   #10
DigitalDoctorTech01
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tullahoma, TN
Posts: 42
Trader Rating: (0)
Default

Don't you think the FPS issue is more of an issue with the driver publishers and not windows vista? Give it about 6 months and all those FPS issues will be ironed out for sure. I'm not saying this release is flawless, Im just pointing out the improvements in security, reliability, and new features that microsoft has incorporated into this release compared to when XP was released.


P.S. Just because you say a few good things about a program by Microsoft doesn't mean you agree with everything they do and sure as heck doesn't mean your on their payroll!

Last edited by DigitalDoctorTech01 : 19-02-2007 at 09:31 PM.
DigitalDoctorTech01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off