PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
ATI Video Cards
ATI X1600 under estimated!
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
ATI Video Cards
ATI X1600 under estimated!
![]() |
ATI X1600 under estimated! |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think the reviews regarding the ATI X1600 are under estimated! I bought
one from CompUSA when they had the $50.00 Instant Rebate, and I've been very satisfied with it. I'm running UT2004, C.O.D., and Half Life 2, and performance has been excellent! If you're looking for a good game card that doesn't cost you an entire paycheck, overheat your room, and destroy your power supply, then you should consider it. Bill Crocker |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
UT2004, Call of Duty, and Half Life 2 are "old" games now, and do not stress
cards from even two years ago. You can run them with an inexpensive X700 and still enable all the visuals. Try something like F.E.A.R. or Oblivion... -- "War is the continuation of politics by other means. It can therefore be said that politics is war without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed." "Bill Crocker" <wcrocker007@comcast.net> wrote in message news:O8CdndOaA4B_oqjZ4p2dnA@comcast.com... >I think the reviews regarding the ATI X1600 are under estimated! I bought >one from CompUSA when they had the $50.00 Instant Rebate, and I've been >very satisfied with it. I'm running UT2004, C.O.D., and Half Life 2, and >performance has been excellent! > > If you're looking for a good game card that doesn't cost you an entire > paycheck, overheat your room, and destroy your power supply, then you > should consider it. > > Bill Crocker > |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 12:20:45 -0400, "Bill Crocker"
<wcrocker007@comcast.net> wrote: >I think the reviews regarding the ATI X1600 are under estimated! I bought >one from CompUSA when they had the $50.00 Instant Rebate, and I've been very >satisfied with it. I'm running UT2004, C.O.D., and Half Life 2, and >performance has been excellent! > >If you're looking for a good game card that doesn't cost you an entire >paycheck, overheat your room, and destroy your power supply, then you should >consider it. > >Bill Crocker > Could you tell us what brand it is and if it is a pro or a tx or a 512mb? I plan to get a xt version from power color the bravo one it is very cheap vs it's performance at 1024x768x32. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It's an "ATI" X1600 PRO with 512MB. I paid $249.99.
Bill Crocker "DDC" <Myhonestthoughttoyou@yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:mdbb32dkd8nbvgqss0rfcgk1ii5c3bcuff@4ax.com... > On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 12:20:45 -0400, "Bill Crocker" > <wcrocker007@comcast.net> wrote: > >>I think the reviews regarding the ATI X1600 are under estimated! I bought >>one from CompUSA when they had the $50.00 Instant Rebate, and I've been >>very >>satisfied with it. I'm running UT2004, C.O.D., and Half Life 2, and >>performance has been excellent! >> >>If you're looking for a good game card that doesn't cost you an entire >>paycheck, overheat your room, and destroy your power supply, then you >>should >>consider it. >> >>Bill Crocker >> > Could you tell us what brand it is and if it is a pro or a tx or a > 512mb? > I plan to get a xt version from power color the bravo one it is very > cheap vs it's performance at 1024x768x32. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 23:40:57 -0400, "Bill Crocker"
<wcrocker007@comcast.net> wrote: >It's an "ATI" X1600 PRO with 512MB. I paid $249.99. > >Bill Crocker It looks interresting who much does it score with 3dmark05 ? |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
DDC wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 23:40:57 -0400, "Bill Crocker" > <wcrocker007@comcast.net> wrote: > > >It's an "ATI" X1600 PRO with 512MB. I paid $249.99. > > > >Bill Crocker > > It looks interresting who much does it score with 3dmark05 ? I would have to agree about the card being under estimated. I bought my card before I read all the head-to-head tests in all the magz and online zines. I was a little dismayed by the results and I started to believe I had purchased a real clunker lol. I bought my card from NewEgg around March 2nd or 3rd 2006 and it is a Sapphire X1600 PRO 512mb with dual DVI, S-video out, HDTV out, and conventional analog adapter. It runs fine. I am running it on 2-year-old, liquid cooled, 3.2ghz, 1500mb PC3200 RAM, MediaCenterEdition Sony Vaio VGC-RA710G PC. It is connected first to a 19.??-inch widescreen ViewSonic Monitor and I have the 2nd video output connected to a 42-inch Toshiba rear-projection TV which we use to watch movies all the time and the quality has greatly improved since using the card. I don't have any of the latest games; I just play UT2004 (which still kicks plenty of ASS in the Fun Department!) and America's Army v2.6.0. They both run smoothly. It does cause my Vaio to work hard at staying cool, but that is ONLY because I have come to realize that Sony outfits their computers with a piece-of-sh*t power supply that cannot be upgraded due to its proprietary configuration...in other words...upgradging to new equipment on a Vaio means having a power supply that is inadequate for upgrades...and you're just Stuck-Like-Chuck! But I'm happy with the card. Good luck! Peace & Hairgrease, Pimps & PimpeTTes ![]() |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
how come the X1600 I found are all One DVI, one VGA? Sapphire brand.
|
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 


