PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Freeware
Software to view extremely large jpg?
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Freeware
Software to view extremely large jpg?
![]() |
Software to view extremely large jpg? |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm trying to view the hi-res version of this photo
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/ne...01/image/a+warn But my machine doesn't have enough grunt I don't think. Has anyone got it to work with faststone image viewer or irfanview? I can view the 6000 x 6000 one ok just not the 18,000 x 18,000 one. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jast wrote: > I'm trying to view the hi-res version of this photo > > http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/ne...01/image/a+warn > > But my machine doesn't have enough grunt I don't think. > > Has anyone got it to work with faststone image viewer or irfanview? > > I can view the 6000 x 6000 one ok just not the 18,000 x 18,000 one. Image Fiddler: http://www.snapfiles.com/get/imagefiddler.html |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:12:36 +1000, Jast <jastx@jastx.com> wrote:
>I'm trying to view the hi-res version of this photo > >http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/ne...01/image/a+warn > >But my machine doesn't have enough grunt I don't think. > >Has anyone got it to work with faststone image viewer or irfanview? > >I can view the 6000 x 6000 one ok just not the 18,000 x 18,000 one. > > There are two "massive files" one a TIF at 49 Megabytes and another TIFF at 385 Megabytes. Which one are you having problems with? I don't wnat to mess with the 385-er unless that's where your problems lie. I'm d/l the 49-er right now. I use ACDsee (an earlier version - 2.3 I think) but I have fastone on my 'puter, too. I'm at 35% loaded right now. My machine is PC w/ Pentium IV I think withe a 1.2GHz clock and 512 Meg RAM. What do you have? What's under the hood of your computer? |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:12:36 +1000, Jast <jastx@jastx.com> wrote:
>I'm trying to view the hi-res version of this photo > >http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/ne...01/image/a+warn > >But my machine doesn't have enough grunt I don't think. > >Has anyone got it to work with faststone image viewer or irfanview? > >I can view the 6000 x 6000 one ok just not the 18,000 x 18,000 one. > > I got the 49-meg loaded into my Slimbrowser and it loads into my ACDSee version 2.4. Awsome picture. I can even zoom in 300% without "staircase-ing." Faststone is running slow... oops there it is in the preview window... It comes right up... Actual size... works fast. Zooms at 300% like ACDSee does... Zoom to 500% causes it to get checkered. No problem dude. Shall I got for the full monte? Now to try fastone... |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:12:36 +1000, Jast <jastx@jastx.com> typed
furiously: >I'm trying to view the hi-res version of this photo > >http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/ne...01/image/a+warn > >But my machine doesn't have enough grunt I don't think. > >Has anyone got it to work with faststone image viewer or irfanview? > >I can view the 6000 x 6000 one ok just not the 18,000 x 18,000 one. > > What resolution can your monitor display? If it is less than 6000 x 6000 then you are wasting your time. -- David Remove "farook" to reply At the bottom of the application where it says "sign here". I put "Sagittarius" E-mail: justdas at iinet dot net dot au |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <43c9bda1$0$32665$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
jastx@jastx.com says... > I'm trying to view the hi-res version of this photo > > http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/ne...01/image/a+warn > > But my machine doesn't have enough grunt I don't think. > > Has anyone got it to work with faststone image viewer or irfanview? > > I can view the 6000 x 6000 one ok just not the 18,000 x 18,000 one. > ============= You probably have been told, or found by now, that many viewing progams (ACDSEE, Better JPEG, XNVIEW, SLOWVIEW, IrfanView .. etc) ALL of them have the option of auto-reducing any picture to fit the confines of your screen. It may only appear to be less than highly-detailed because of such squishing down for viewing, but you can always expand it to FULL strength for pan-around viewing. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 14 Jan 2006 19:29:25 -0800, "J-Walker"
<dump.20.esquire@spamgourmet.com> wrote: > >Jast wrote: >> I'm trying to view the hi-res version of this photo >> >> http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/ne...01/image/a+warn >> >> But my machine doesn't have enough grunt I don't think. >> >> Has anyone got it to work with faststone image viewer or irfanview? >> >> I can view the 6000 x 6000 one ok just not the 18,000 x 18,000 one. > >Image Fiddler: http://www.snapfiles.com/get/imagefiddler.html I downloaded the 350-Meg file. Flashstone choked on it. ACDSee 2.4 took it OK. It seems you can zoom right out to the surface of a star! Of course we know better. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hmmn, seems like my swap file isn't big enough on the C drive even
though it is unlimited on my D drive So looks like I need a biggerswap file on C drive which I don't have unless I do a rebuild or maybe try to use some partition manager to resize it. I have a Athlon XP 1800 with a 1Gb RAM. Michael Wardreau wrote: > On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:12:36 +1000, Jast <jastx@jastx.com> wrote: > >> I'm trying to view the hi-res version of this photo >> >> http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/ne...01/image/a+warn >> >> But my machine doesn't have enough grunt I don't think. >> >> Has anyone got it to work with faststone image viewer or irfanview? >> >> I can view the 6000 x 6000 one ok just not the 18,000 x 18,000 one. >> >> > There are two "massive files" one a TIF at 49 Megabytes and another > TIFF at 385 Megabytes. Which one are you having problems with? I > don't wnat to mess with the 385-er unless that's where your problems > lie. I'm d/l the 49-er right now. I use ACDsee (an earlier version - > 2.3 I think) but I have fastone on my 'puter, too. I'm at 35% loaded > right now. > > My machine is PC w/ Pentium IV I think withe a 1.2GHz clock and 512 > Meg RAM. What do you have? What's under the hood of your computer? |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:09:56 +1030, David <farookdas@picknowl.com.au> wrote:
>What resolution can your monitor display? If it is less than 6000 x >6000 then you are wasting your time. Use the zoom and you're in for a treat. That is 1 monster picture. It took Faststone nearly 15 sec to load. Once loaded, the pan and zoom keys worked fine on my 1280x1024 monitor. -- Bob |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
So what loaded and worked smoother, Faststone or IrfanView?
My computer doesn't have enough grunt to test it out ![]() Bob Adkins wrote: > On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:09:56 +1030, David <farookdas@picknowl.com.au> wrote: > > >> What resolution can your monitor display? If it is less than 6000 x >> 6000 then you are wasting your time. > > Use the zoom and you're in for a treat. > > That is 1 monster picture. It took Faststone nearly 15 sec to load. Once > loaded, the pan and zoom keys worked fine on my 1280x1024 monitor. |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

So looks like I need a bigger
