PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows XP
Windows XP Work Remotely
Wi-Fi as default network connection
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows XP
Windows XP Work Remotely
Wi-Fi as default network connection
![]() |
Wi-Fi as default network connection |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi!
I am planning to use wi-fi instead of wired network, but it seems that wi-fi network only activates when user logged on to user. I have a Windows 2000 domain and users need to connect to the domain to run scripts and be able to access network resources. I have users running Windows XP Professional SP2 and SP1. Can this be possible with this setup or do I still need a wired network? Me |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi (whatever your real name is, but we all use our real names here, you
should follow this rule!), i do not recommend to use a domain controllers main network interface over a wireless network, because if you have heavy logons and data transfer, this could end up in serious speed problems and it is also a great security threat when someone was able to crack your encryption keys, he will be able to "sniff" your data. Your networking Interface should be activated when you boot and your system shows the logon screen. But if you have some special drivers or connection software that needs someone to logon, you should write a starter programm or a strartup script e.g VBS or a language you like to start the application with system startup. The Interface should, if on a server, statically configured or when dhcp is used assign a static address with MAC Reservation for the Interface. But if you have some special GPO's that deactivate or prevent your interface from connecting/working with the Network Environment you must reconfigure them! Everbody who has accees to your network whether wired or wireless, cann connect to your domain when he/she/it has the sufficiend access rights and all the passwords. There are some limitations on ActiveDirectory and GPO's between XP and 2000 but most of them you will never use or are in most env. unnecessary. I can tell you this, because i am a BOFH and responsible for over 200 Systems including *nix, Novell, Mac and Windows NT-based Machines. ;-) Best Regards Kerem Gümrükcü "M P" <mark@textguru.ph> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:%23Ik87pBOGHA.2696@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... > Hi! > > I am planning to use wi-fi instead of wired network, but it seems that > wi-fi network only activates when user logged on to user. I have a Windows > 2000 domain and users need to connect to the domain to run scripts and be > able to access network resources. I have users running Windows XP > Professional SP2 and SP1. Can this be possible with this setup or do I > still need a wired network? > > Me > |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
MP yes you can build a wireless domain. Users connect to domains not user.
User log on scripts are run after the user provide the correct credentials, which they are able to do after they are able to connect to the domain wirelessly. Access points are usually hard wired to the domain and are configured to use security integrated with your domain (IEEE 802.1X authentication) configured to accept connections from the wireless machines (device) with the correct security configuration. Management of the connected device takes place in much the same way as it would for wired machines to the network. The procedure is available and more small business are moving to or building a part of their network wirelessly. They are finding ways of containing their radio signal and finding better ways of encrypting it. "M P" <mark@textguru.ph> wrote in message news:%23Ik87pBOGHA.2696@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... > Hi! > > I am planning to use wi-fi instead of wired network, but it seems that > wi-fi network only activates when user logged on to user. I have a Windows > 2000 domain and users need to connect to the domain to run scripts and be > able to access network resources. I have users running Windows XP > Professional SP2 and SP1. Can this be possible with this setup or do I > still need a wired network? > > Me > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There are several options:
1. depending on your HW (eg Cisco, Intel) you can use a client with pre-logon connectivity. 2. Use PKI for Wireless authentication 3. Rethink your design. WiFi (especially using thick clients) is still fragile. Use a double infrastructure wired and wireless, but I wouldn't lose the copper if I were u!! "beb" wrote: > MP yes you can build a wireless domain. Users connect to domains not user. > User log on scripts are run after the user provide the correct credentials, > which they are able to do after they are able to connect to the domain > wirelessly. Access points are usually hard wired to the domain and are > configured to use security integrated with your domain (IEEE 802.1X > authentication) configured to accept connections from the wireless machines > (device) with the correct security configuration. Management of the > connected device takes place in much the same way as it would for wired > machines to the network. The procedure is available and more small business > are moving to or building a part of their network wirelessly. They are > finding ways of containing their radio signal and finding better ways of > encrypting it. > > > "M P" <mark@textguru.ph> wrote in message > news:%23Ik87pBOGHA.2696@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... > > Hi! > > > > I am planning to use wi-fi instead of wired network, but it seems that > > wi-fi network only activates when user logged on to user. I have a Windows > > 2000 domain and users need to connect to the domain to run scripts and be > > able to access network resources. I have users running Windows XP > > Professional SP2 and SP1. Can this be possible with this setup or do I > > still need a wired network? > > > > Me > > > > > |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You can use whatever name you want. No one knows if Kerem Gümrükcü is her
real name, and if that is her real email address its gonna get spammed to death. Keep yourself as annonymous as you feel comforatble with. -- Please repost if you find the fault Glen P ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Kerem Gümrükcü" <kareem114@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%23XGS65BOGHA.2472@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > Hi (whatever your real name is, but we all use our real names here, you > should follow this rule!), > > Best Regards > > Kerem Gümrükcü |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

