PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows XP
Windows XP Hardware
Event ID 51, USB 2.0 HDD not responding properly (internal WD 160 GB in a CompUSA enclosure)
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows XP
Windows XP Hardware
Event ID 51, USB 2.0 HDD not responding properly (internal WD 160 GB in a CompUSA enclosure)
![]() |
Event ID 51, USB 2.0 HDD not responding properly (internal WD 160 GB in a CompUSA enclosure) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Event ID: 51
Event Type: Warning Event Source: Disk Description: An Error was detected on device \Device\Harddisk3\D during a paging operation. Q244780 My results below (and differ slightly from Q244780): 0000: 04 00 68 00 01 00 b6 00 0008: 00 00 00 00 33 00 04 80 (IO_WARNING PAGING FAILURE) 0010: 2d 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 (STATUS_SUCCESS, request will be retried) 0018: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0028: c2 4e 00 00 00 00 00 00 (PATH ID= 0x????????; TARGET ID = 0x????????) 0030: ff ff ff ff 03 00 00 00 (LUN = 0x????????) 0038: 40 00 00 0e 00 00 00 00 (ScsiStatus = 0x40; SrbStatus =0x00) (ScsiStatus = 0x40 means what?) (SrbStatus of 0x00 = SRB_Status pending) 0040: 00 20 0a 12 80 03 20 40 0048: 00 00 01 00 0a 00 00 00 0050: 00 00 00 00 a8 bf 9b 81 0058: 00 00 00 00 38 ea b2 fb 0060: 00 00 00 00 08 81 c0 07 0068: 2a 00 07 c0 81 08 00 00 0070: 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0078: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0080: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0088: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Those nos mean absolutly zero to 99% of all pc users.However,click on the
event/warning in event viewer,click on the url in it,this opens kb help/support in xp usually with a fix or solution to it.Event 51 is a hardware issue i believe. "Cymbal Man Freq." wrote: > Event ID: 51 > > Event Type: Warning > > Event Source: Disk > > Description: An Error was detected on device \Device\Harddisk3\D during a > paging operation. > > Q244780 > > My results below (and differ slightly from Q244780): > > 0000: 04 00 68 00 01 00 b6 00 > > 0008: 00 00 00 00 33 00 04 80 > > (IO_WARNING PAGING FAILURE) > > > > 0010: 2d 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > (STATUS_SUCCESS, request will be retried) > > > > 0018: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > 0020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > 0028: c2 4e 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > (PATH ID= 0x????????; TARGET ID = 0x????????) > > > > 0030: ff ff ff ff 03 00 00 00 (LUN = 0x????????) > > > > 0038: 40 00 00 0e 00 00 00 00 > > (ScsiStatus = 0x40; SrbStatus =0x00) > > (ScsiStatus = 0x40 means what?) > > (SrbStatus of 0x00 = SRB_Status pending) > > > > 0040: 00 20 0a 12 80 03 20 40 > > 0048: 00 00 01 00 0a 00 00 00 > > 0050: 00 00 00 00 a8 bf 9b 81 > > 0058: 00 00 00 00 38 ea b2 fb > > 0060: 00 00 00 00 08 81 c0 07 > > 0068: 2a 00 07 c0 81 08 00 00 > > 0070: 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > 0078: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > 0080: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > 0088: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > > |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
As you already can guess yourself, there was an i/o error on the usb-attached
disk. Close all apps that can access it and reconnect the disk. Run chkdsk /F on it to fix possible errors. If you see these errors often, replace the USB cable. Get the highest quality cable (in a thick rigid metallic mesh coating. not el cheapo, thin black plastic coating) Regards, --PA "Cymbal Man Freq." wrote: > Event ID: 51 > > Event Type: Warning > > Event Source: Disk > > Description: An Error was detected on device \Device\Harddisk3\D during a > paging operation. > > Q244780 > > My results below (and differ slightly from Q244780): > > 0000: 04 00 68 00 01 00 b6 00 > > 0008: 00 00 00 00 33 00 04 80 > > (IO_WARNING PAGING FAILURE) > > > > 0010: 2d 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > (STATUS_SUCCESS, request will be retried) > > > > 0018: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > 0020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > 0028: c2 4e 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > (PATH ID= 0x????????; TARGET ID = 0x????????) > > > > 0030: ff ff ff ff 03 00 00 00 (LUN = 0x????????) > > > > 0038: 40 00 00 0e 00 00 00 00 > > (ScsiStatus = 0x40; SrbStatus =0x00) > > (ScsiStatus = 0x40 means what?) > > (SrbStatus of 0x00 = SRB_Status pending) > > > > 0040: 00 20 0a 12 80 03 20 40 > > 0048: 00 00 01 00 0a 00 00 00 > > 0050: 00 00 00 00 a8 bf 9b 81 > > 0058: 00 00 00 00 38 ea b2 fb > > 0060: 00 00 00 00 08 81 c0 07 > > 0068: 2a 00 07 c0 81 08 00 00 > > 0070: 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > 0078: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > 0080: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > 0088: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Pavel A." <pavel_a@NOwritemeNO.com> wrote in message news:282E0D0B-BFB0-4840-A777-B3569AF14442@microsoft.com... > As you already can guess yourself, there was an i/o error on the usb-attached > disk. > Close all apps that can access it and reconnect the disk. > Run chkdsk /F on it to fix possible errors. > If you see these errors often, replace the USB cable. Get the highest > quality cable (in a thick rigid metallic mesh coating. not el cheapo, thin > black plastic coating) > > Regards, > --PA Would I likely get this kind of error when using Win XP Home? http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=885352 System event ID 11 is logged when you cancel an I/O operation to a raw USB 2.0-attached hard disk drive in Windows 2000 Server SP4 "CAUSE The System log error occurs because, when an I/O request packet (IRP) is correctly canceled, the Usbstor.sys driver cannot translate the cancel operation to a SCSI error, and therefore the operation is marked as an error. The error is not valid, because no data destined for the hard disk drive is lost, and there is no device error. RESOLUTION No action is required. The System log error is informational only and can be safely ignored. The third-party products that this article discusses are manufactured by companies that are independent of Microsoft. Microsoft makes no warranty, implied or otherwise, regarding the performance or reliability of these products." I'll try a powered USB 2.0 hub plugged into a USB 2.0/Firewire PCI card and use a different USB cable between the HDD and the hub. The HDD is currently in RAW form since formatting cannot be completed in either FAT32 or NTFS, and the last partition couldn't be completed either. I'm wondering now if I can format the USB 2.0 drive on a Windows 98 SE machine without a PCI controller card, but with a USB 2.0 PCI card? I'll still be stuck for the last partition not being any good at all (the last 47 GB of a 160 GB HDD). Maybe I could repartition, so I lose less space on the last partition? How much space should I have left in the unallocated space of the last partition? At least in Windows 98 SE I could format to something bigger than 32GB per FAT32 partition!? I would guess that all would work on a WinXP machine if I could do it. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Cymbal Man Freq." wrote:
> Would I likely get this kind of error when using Win XP Home? Yes. XP Pro and Home share the same kernel and drivers. The Home version does it's best to be easier on clueless users, but in case of hardware errors it falls short ![]() > http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=885352 > System event ID 11 is logged when you cancel an I/O operation to a raw USB > 2.0-attached hard disk drive in Windows 2000 Server SP4 Wait a moment... it was event id 51, how it become 11? Or this question is not related to your previous one? --PA |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well, I switched out the USB cable for a different one, and brought in a USB
2.0 powered HUB. Then I could partition and format once again, so the hard drive ISN"T shot! Then I got to copy three 2 GB image files. The first two copied in 4 minutes flat, each. The third one took 20 minutes, so I figure the machine ramped down to USB 1.1 speed (100 MB per minute as a salesman at the store told me once). I still have many more GB to copy. Why the sudden slowdown in the copy rate? Nothing changed with the machine in that time, AFAIK yet. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There were HUNDREDS of Event 51 errors during the time that the copying was
done for all 3 large files. So why were the files copied successfully? "Cymbal Man Freq." <Don't Bother@ForgedPostsAnonymous.unorg> wrote in message news:5LzFf.5777$mF2.3217@trndny09... > Well, I switched out the USB cable for a different one, and brought in a > USB 2.0 powered HUB. Then I could partition and format once again, so the > hard drive ISN"T shot! Then I got to copy three 2 GB image files. The > first two copied in 4 minutes flat, each. The third one took 20 minutes, > so I figure the machine ramped down to USB 1.1 speed (100 MB per minute as > a salesman at the store told me once). I still have many more GB to copy. > Why the sudden slowdown in the copy rate? Nothing changed with the machine > in that time, AFAIK yet. > |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
error 51 usually means trouble reading the drive, thats why it slowed down. Windows will drop the
speed if it has trouble doing a read. Just because you can partition and format doesn't mean they isn't anything wrong with drive. Download diagnostics from har drive manufacturer to be sure. -- Dave Vair CNE, CNA, MCP, A+, N+ "Cymbal Man Freq." <Don't Bother@ForgedPostsAnonymous.unorg> wrote in message news:fPzFf.19204$ZS3.2145@trndny05... > There were HUNDREDS of Event 51 errors during the time that the copying was done for all 3 large > files. So why were the files copied successfully? > > > "Cymbal Man Freq." <Don't Bother@ForgedPostsAnonymous.unorg> wrote in message > news:5LzFf.5777$mF2.3217@trndny09... >> Well, I switched out the USB cable for a different one, and brought in a USB 2.0 powered HUB. >> Then I could partition and format once again, so the hard drive ISN"T shot! Then I got to copy >> three 2 GB image files. The first two copied in 4 minutes flat, each. The third one took 20 >> minutes, so I figure the machine ramped down to USB 1.1 speed (100 MB per minute as a salesman at >> the store told me once). I still have many more GB to copy. Why the sudden slowdown in the copy >> rate? Nothing changed with the machine in that time, AFAIK yet. >> > > |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Here's an excerpt by someone who thinks they've figured out some fix for Event
51 errors....but many people at this link have vastly different answers and temporary answers. What works for awhile, quickly doesn't work much longer. A lot of blame on M$ for this kind of problem. I am using a Promise ATA 100 Controller PCI card for the two internal hard drives. Everybody at this link swears by Promise Controller cards for fixing problems like this. Maybe mine is a little too old? It hasn't been used but for the last 4 months. http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/con...ic/12946/?o=120 Yeah, I'm using Windows XP Pro with SP2 installed. I've never installed or used Norton on my machine but I am using McAfee VirusScan 9.0. I did try adjusting my pagefile but it had no effect. I set it to 500MB, then 1500MB, then disabled it altogether, but I still kept gettings those errors. I know it sounds silly but setting my memory preference to Programs instead of System Cache really does solve my \Device\Harddisk0\D problems. People can give it a try by going to their control panel and clicking on the system icon/app, click on the "Advanced" tab, click on the "Settings" button under Performance to bring up the Performance Options menu, click on "Advanced" tab, and then you can set your memory usage to Programs instead of System Cache. I've also set my Processor scheduling to Programs but that doesn't seem to affect the \Device\Harddisk0\D errors. It seems like such a small insignificant setting but I swear it is the cause and cure of my \Device\Harddisk0\D problems. I too was also prepared to take everyone's advice and buy a Promise RAID controller but I stumbled onto my cure. I hope everyone here finds a way to solve their problems because I know how frustrating it is to spend your hard-earned money on "quality" parts only to have your computer running less than perfectly. And I have tons of respect for all you guys out there that actually contact your system/software vendors and demand answers for these annoying problems that we all experience. To all the people who actually have the time and energy to contact Microsoft: You guys are heroes! I would never have the patience to do that. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Should I set the swapfile to 2.5 GB if I want to copy 2.0 GB image files?
|
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 


