PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Processors
Removing Mini PCI video from chipset
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Processors
Removing Mini PCI video from chipset
![]() |
Removing Mini PCI video from chipset |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I've got an IBM eServer xseries 225 8649 type running XP Pro with SP2.
This system comes with a 7505 Intel Chipset with an on-board video mini-pci ATI Rage XL PCI card. I would like to upgrade it to a Nvidia G-Force 6200 graphics card that I have fitted into the AGP Pro slot on the board but I only get 16-color (4-bit) video and the following error in device manager: This device cannot find enough free resources that it can use. (Code 12) If you want to use this device, you will need to disable one of the other devices on this system. I ran through the prompted microsoft troubleshooting but still no success. I have tried everything to remove all traces of the ATI drivers (including Driver Cleaner!) but to no effect. I have even remove the Rage XL mini pci card from the board but it still gives me the Code 12 error. I have check the BIOS configuration settings and I can't find any way to point the video adapter at a PCI or AGP slot as there is with some intel chipsets. Perhaps it's just not possible to upgrade to a different graphics card, but I'd like to explore all possibilities first before returning my graphics card to the shop. Thanks, Richard |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ok, after further searching I found this in the Adapter Considerations
section of the IBM xSeries 225 Types 8649 Hardware Maintenance Manual and Troubleshooting Guide: - Installation of an AGP video adapter in the AGP slot is not supported. - You can install only a 32-bit adapter in the 32-bit PCI slot 1 and 64-bit adapters in the 64-bit PCI-X slots 2 through 5. - You can install full-length adapters in all five expansion slots; however, full-length, double-width adapters will not fit in slot 5 and are not supported. None of the expansion slots are hot-plug. - The 32-bit PCI slot 1 supports 5.0 V signaling PCI adapters; it does not support 3.3 V signaling adapters or 64-bit adapters. - The 64-bit PCI-X slots 2 through 5 support 3.3 V signaling PCI or PCI-X adapters; they do not support 5.0 V signaling adapters. So it's back to the shop for a refund. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 13 Dec 2005 06:48:56 -0800, "cryotiger" <richardglazer@hotmail.com>
wrote: >Ok, after further searching I found this in the Adapter Considerations >section of the IBM xSeries 225 Types 8649 Hardware Maintenance Manual >and Troubleshooting Guide: > >- Installation of an AGP video adapter in the AGP slot is not >supported. I'm extremely curious, why did they provide an AGP slot if you cannot install an AGP graphics card in it??? Is there something else that the AGP slot is actually used for??? -- A Lost Angel, fallen from heaven Lost in dreams, Lost in aspirations, Lost to the world, Lost to myself |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 13 Dec 2005 06:48:56 -0800, "cryotiger" <richardglazer@hotmail.com>
wrote: >Ok, after further searching I found this in the Adapter Considerations >section of the IBM xSeries 225 Types 8649 Hardware Maintenance Manual >and Troubleshooting Guide: > >- Installation of an AGP video adapter in the AGP slot is not >supported. ?!?!? What in the hell else are you going to use in that AGP slot? ------------- Tony Hill hilla <underscore> 20 <at> yahoo <dot> ca |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:41:15 -0500, Tony Hill <hilla_nospam_20@yahoo.ca>
wrote: >On 13 Dec 2005 06:48:56 -0800, "cryotiger" <richardglazer@hotmail.com> >wrote: > >>Ok, after further searching I found this in the Adapter Considerations >>section of the IBM xSeries 225 Types 8649 Hardware Maintenance Manual >>and Troubleshooting Guide: >> >>- Installation of an AGP video adapter in the AGP slot is not >>supported. > >?!?!? What in the hell else are you going to use in that AGP slot? Nothing. AGP slot support was probably de-featured as part of a marketing play (ploy) for a low-end box. A rung or two up the price-point ladder, that slot probably worked... |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:58:11 -0500, daytripper
<day_trippr@REMOVEyahoo.com> wrote: >On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:41:15 -0500, Tony Hill <hilla_nospam_20@yahoo.ca> >wrote: > >>On 13 Dec 2005 06:48:56 -0800, "cryotiger" <richardglazer@hotmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>Ok, after further searching I found this in the Adapter Considerations >>>section of the IBM xSeries 225 Types 8649 Hardware Maintenance Manual >>>and Troubleshooting Guide: >>> >>>- Installation of an AGP video adapter in the AGP slot is not >>>supported. >> >>?!?!? What in the hell else are you going to use in that AGP slot? > >Nothing. AGP slot support was probably de-featured as part of a marketing play >(ploy) for a low-end box. > >A rung or two up the price-point ladder, that slot probably worked... Looks quite like castrated P2, aka cacheless Celeron (covington, IIRC). In some sense, even worse - that one didn't even pretend to have the feature that was cut off. eServer with neuticles? P) NNN |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:58:11 -0500, daytripper
<day_trippr@REMOVEyahoo.com> wrote: >On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:41:15 -0500, Tony Hill <hilla_nospam_20@yahoo.ca> >wrote: > >>On 13 Dec 2005 06:48:56 -0800, "cryotiger" <richardglazer@hotmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>- Installation of an AGP video adapter in the AGP slot is not >>>supported. >> >>?!?!? What in the hell else are you going to use in that AGP slot? > >Nothing. AGP slot support was probably de-featured as part of a marketing play >(ploy) for a low-end box. > >A rung or two up the price-point ladder, that slot probably worked... That's really quite tragic! And IBM is supposed to be one of the "respectable" companies in the server world! You almost have to laugh about this except for the fact that the original poster is probably by no means the only one who was having trouble figuring out why no video cards will work in that darned AGP slot! Maybe if we've lucky they'll put some fake cache chips on their next server! ------------- Tony Hill hilla <underscore> 20 <at> yahoo <dot> ca |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Tony Hill" <hilla_nospam_20@yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:u6m1q198ogt8q1mgb3vb37ticml33u582e@4ax.com... > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:58:11 -0500, daytripper > <day_trippr@REMOVEyahoo.com> wrote: > >>On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:41:15 -0500, Tony Hill >><hilla_nospam_20@yahoo.ca> >>wrote: >> >>>On 13 Dec 2005 06:48:56 -0800, "cryotiger" <richardglazer@hotmail.com> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>- Installation of an AGP video adapter in the AGP slot is not >>>>supported. >>> >>>?!?!? What in the hell else are you going to use in that AGP slot? >> >>Nothing. AGP slot support was probably de-featured as part of a >>marketing play >>(ploy) for a low-end box. >> >>A rung or two up the price-point ladder, that slot probably worked... > > That's really quite tragic! And IBM is supposed to be one of the > "respectable" companies in the server world! You almost have to laugh > about this except for the fact that the original poster is probably by > no means the only one who was having trouble figuring out why no video > cards will work in that darned AGP slot! > > Maybe if we've lucky they'll put some fake cache chips on their next > server! > > ------------- > Tony Hill > hilla <underscore> 20 <at> yahoo <dot> ca Did the specs say it supported AGP video? Did OP pay for AGP video? What made him believe that AGP video would ever work? Would you all be happier if IBM hadn't bothered to solder the connector on the board? del |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:59:29 -0600, "Del Cecchi"
<delcecchiofthenorth@gmail.com> wrote: > >"Tony Hill" <hilla_nospam_20@yahoo.ca> wrote in message >news:u6m1q198ogt8q1mgb3vb37ticml33u582e@4ax.com... >> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:58:11 -0500, daytripper >> <day_trippr@REMOVEyahoo.com> wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:41:15 -0500, Tony Hill >>><hilla_nospam_20@yahoo.ca> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>On 13 Dec 2005 06:48:56 -0800, "cryotiger" <richardglazer@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>- Installation of an AGP video adapter in the AGP slot is not >>>>>supported. >>>> >>>>?!?!? What in the hell else are you going to use in that AGP slot? >>> >>>Nothing. AGP slot support was probably de-featured as part of a >>>marketing play >>>(ploy) for a low-end box. >>> >>>A rung or two up the price-point ladder, that slot probably worked... >> >> That's really quite tragic! And IBM is supposed to be one of the >> "respectable" companies in the server world! You almost have to laugh >> about this except for the fact that the original poster is probably by >> no means the only one who was having trouble figuring out why no video >> cards will work in that darned AGP slot! >> >> Maybe if we've lucky they'll put some fake cache chips on their next >> server! >> >> ------------- >> Tony Hill >> hilla <underscore> 20 <at> yahoo <dot> ca > >Did the specs say it supported AGP video? Did OP pay for AGP video? >What made him believe that AGP video would ever work? Would you all be >happier if IBM hadn't bothered to solder the connector on the board? > >del "Settle down, Francis." |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
daytripper wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:59:29 -0600, "Del Cecchi" > <delcecchiofthenorth@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>"Tony Hill" <hilla_nospam_20@yahoo.ca> wrote in message >>news:u6m1q198ogt8q1mgb3vb37ticml33u582e@4ax.com... >> >>>On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:58:11 -0500, daytripper >>><day_trippr@REMOVEyahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:41:15 -0500, Tony Hill >>>><hilla_nospam_20@yahoo.ca> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>On 13 Dec 2005 06:48:56 -0800, "cryotiger" <richardglazer@hotmail.com> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>- Installation of an AGP video adapter in the AGP slot is not >>>>>>supported. >>>>> >>>>>?!?!? What in the hell else are you going to use in that AGP slot? >>>> >>>>Nothing. AGP slot support was probably de-featured as part of a >>>>marketing play >>>>(ploy) for a low-end box. >>>> >>>>A rung or two up the price-point ladder, that slot probably worked... >>> >>>That's really quite tragic! And IBM is supposed to be one of the >>>"respectable" companies in the server world! You almost have to laugh >>>about this except for the fact that the original poster is probably by >>>no means the only one who was having trouble figuring out why no video >>>cards will work in that darned AGP slot! >>> >>>Maybe if we've lucky they'll put some fake cache chips on their next >>>server! >>> >>>------------- >>>Tony Hill >>>hilla <underscore> 20 <at> yahoo <dot> ca >> >>Did the specs say it supported AGP video? Did OP pay for AGP video? >>What made him believe that AGP video would ever work? Would you all be >>happier if IBM hadn't bothered to solder the connector on the board? >> >>del > > > "Settle down, Francis." Why should I settle down? Tony is the one who called it "tragic" and implied IBM was less than respectable for putting this unusable connector in this model server. And a server needs AGP video for? del -- Del Cecchi "This post is my own and doesn’t necessarily represent IBM’s positions, strategies or opinions.” |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

