PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Spyware Discussion
Anti Spyware Latency
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Spyware Discussion
Anti Spyware Latency
![]() |
Anti Spyware Latency |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Has anyone noticed a lot of latency using this program?
In real time mode I suffered many time outs, and slow page loading. My connection is fast, and it all works great if I disengage the antispyware. Any ideas? Thanks H |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
By fast I'm assuming you have a broadband connection, correct?
My guess might be a problem with the WiFi Connection security checkpoint in the Internet Agents portion of Real-time Portection if you are connecting using a wireless router. But what you might also be seeing is a problem where the packets of data that are being transmitted accross the Internet aren't getting to your system fast enough for the refresh window on your system. If the refresh window is not large enough (i.e., the size of the data file), then the system will ask for packets to be resent even though they really don't need to be resent. I discovered this possible cause from Call for Help on G4tv, Leo Laporte told a person that was getting a decent download rate for local (Austrailian) sites but was getting about 1/2 that for sites that were located elsewhere to go to http://cable-dsl.home.att.net/ and check out John Navas' web site that talks about tweaking settings to get a faster connection using broadband. NOTE: In order to use this you will have to use the ping command to ping a site that you are trying to view to get it's average ping time and then use this value to lookup the refresh window setting that's appropriate from the table on http://cable-dsl.home.att.net/. To do so, look over the show notes from http://www.callforhelptv.com/callfo...tml?transcripts (search for Ben, the name of the caller that was having problems with latency of downloads and viewing sites). Alan "hlsj" wrote: > Has anyone noticed a lot of latency using this program? > In real time mode I suffered many time outs, and slow page loading. > My connection is fast, and it all works great if I disengage the antispyware. > Any ideas? > Thanks > H |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"hlsj" <hlsj@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3844C233-48F5-4C4A-B376-595ABF0981A1@microsoft.com... > Has anyone noticed a lot of latency using this program? > In real time mode I suffered many time outs, and slow page loading. > My connection is fast, and it all works great if I disengage the > antispyware. > Any ideas? > Thanks > H I had no perceived slow-down on my host at home when I installed MSAS. However, on 2 other family members hosts, the network traffic was slowed considerably. Uninstalling MSAS got them back up to speed. Since MSAS *polls* for changes rather than intercepts them, and until there is evidence that Microsoft changes this paradigm method of late detection (which is also how WinPatrol works), I decided to uninstall it on my host, too. You could easily test it yourself. Uninstall MSAS and check performance and responsiveness. Then install again and check again. -- __________________________________________________ E-mail: Remove "NIX" and add "#LAH" to Subject. __________________________________________________ |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> Since MSAS *polls* for changes rather than intercepts them
Yes, and ... in case you have (e.g.) a webpage with a script loading images (like an ad-rotator) MSAS will bang up and start eating CPU since it will poll and check each and every request, you may confirm this just by closing the copy of the browser with the "script page" and MSAS will suddenly go "quiet" |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi
Clean out all temporarily junk that MSAS must work with, overtime ![]() www.ccleaner.com Decrease TIF settings to 40MB to avoid this junk yard. IE tools Also check these PCs for undetected spyware/processes with Lavasofts Adaware. http://www.download.com/Ad-Aware-SE...2.html?tag=list Maybe to also check these PCs in safe mode ? -- plun hlsj has brought this to us : > Has anyone noticed a lot of latency using this program? > In real time mode I suffered many time outs, and slow page loading. > My connection is fast, and it all works great if I disengage the antispyware. > Any ideas? > Thanks > H |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 


