Just Saw Your Sig Line, Johnnie !!! LOL

John Corliss in his sig line bleated:

I don't reply to trolls, especially "Chrissy Cruiser".
**************************************

LOL

http://tinyurl.com/9aba6

1. John Corliss Nov 3 2004, 11:34 am show options
Newsgroups: alt.comp.freeware
From: John Corliss <jcorl...@secrewspam.to#> - Find messages by this author
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 07:34:12 -0800
Local: Wed, Nov 3 2004 11:34 am
Subject: "Moi disgustimento."

"This group has finally become useless to me and it looks like it's
time to move on.........I'm no longer going to
actively participate in this group. I'll still lurk once in a while -
may even post but guarantee that it might be under another name.
That's my right.

Otherwise, I'm unsubscribing. I give. The assholes have won as I knew
and predicted they eventually would.

Trolls like Andy Mabbett and others who participate in this group will
rejoice that I'm leaving and to them I can only say:

*"GO **** YOURSELVES IN THE ASS WITH A SPLINTERY TWO-BY-FOUR."*
*********************************************************

LOL LOL

What a guy.

CC

Chrissy Cruiser wrote:
> John Corliss in his sig line bleated:
>
> I don't reply to trolls, especially "Chrissy Cruiser".
> **************************************
>
> LOL



hehe, I saw that and meant to ask you what you had done wrong. Are you
upset?

snet.com.au:

> Chrissy Cruiser wrote:
>> John Corliss in his sig line bleated:
>>
>> I don't reply to trolls, especially "Chrissy Cruiser".
>> **************************************
>>
>> LOL
>
> hehe, I saw that and meant to ask you what you had done wrong. Are you
> upset?
>
I used to think of JC as a regular bloke, if a bit stiffnecked.

While not necessarily differing with his list of plonkees, except CC of
course, publishing it seems in vile bad taste

mike

mike ring <mike.ring@MICHAELbtinternet.com> wrote in
news:Xns96E78576BBD67mikeringbtinternetco@130.133.1.4:


> I used to think of JC as a regular bloke, if a bit stiffnecked.
>
> While not necessarily differing with his list of plonkees, except CC of
> course, publishing it seems in vile bad taste
>

While I never necessarily agree with all of John Corliss's views, I
regard his *view* higher than Crissy Cruiser's. Now that JC is back (and
keeping up with the pills <wink>) his comments are far
(far..far..far..etc) more reasoned than 'Chrissy's' ever were.



--
I've learned that no matter how much I care, some people are just
assholes.

On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 08:20:45 +1000, canetoad wrote:

> Chrissy Cruiser wrote:
>> John Corliss in his sig line bleated:
>>
>> I don't reply to trolls, especially "Chrissy Cruiser".
>> **************************************
>>
>> LOL
>
> hehe, I saw that and meant to ask you what you had done wrong. Are you
> upset?

Terribly upset, I say, nearly beyond words. Johnny's a child wrapped in an
adult body.

Anyone who kicks his ass gets called a "troll". He lives in a world of
trolls by definition.
--

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguisable from magic.
- Arthur C. Clarke

On 6 Oct 2005 12:07:12 GMT, mike ring wrote:

>> Chrissy Cruiser wrote:
>>> John Corliss in his sig line bleated:
>>>
>>> I don't reply to trolls, especially "Chrissy Cruiser".
>>> **************************************
>>>
>>> LOL
>>
>> hehe, I saw that and meant to ask you what you had done wrong. Are you
>> upset?
>>
> I used to think of JC as a regular bloke, if a bit stiffnecked.
>
> While not necessarily differing with his list of plonkees, except CC of
> course, publishing it seems in vile bad taste
>
> mike

Are you calling Johnny vile?
--

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguisable from magic.
- Arthur C. Clarke

On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 12:26:39 GMT, Reg Edit wrote:

> While I never necessarily agree with all of John Corliss's views, I
> regard his *view* higher than Crissy Cruiser's

Spelling, spelling, regard it higher and you might succeed in life.

C(h)rissy

PS. Real nice post from you today and below, Hypocrite.

***************************************************



> Jack Purvis <dismal_dan_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:mda9k1189ej3et4rulrm4jngoen3qphel6@4ax.com:
>
>> Is there a freeware program that hides the users IP address without
>> doing anything else?

On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 12:13:15 GMT, Reg Edit wrote:

> Why ?
> Stop surfing porn sites.
>
>> Something small and simple would be nice.
> The size of your dick ?

Chrissy Cruiser <doublebreasted@mail.com> wrote in
news:52pj0ser26ne.9z4o6w7jmpl4$.dlg@40tude.net:

>>>
>> I used to think of JC as a regular bloke, if a bit stiffnecked.
>>
>> While not necessarily differing with his list of plonkees, except CC of
>> course, publishing it seems in vile bad taste
>>
>> mike
>
> Are you calling Johnny vile?

Not as such, it wasn't ad hominem.

But a number of such acts would perhaps indicate something, I hope it was
just a naberration

mike

Chrissy Cruiser wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 08:20:45 +1000, canetoad wrote:
>
>
>>Chrissy Cruiser wrote:
>>
>>>John Corliss in his sig line bleated:
>>>
>>>I don't reply to trolls, especially "Chrissy Cruiser".
>>>**************************************
>>>
>>>LOL
>>
>>hehe, I saw that and meant to ask you what you had done wrong. Are you
>>upset?
>
>
> Terribly upset, I say, nearly beyond words. Johnny's a child wrapped in an
> adult body.
>
> Anyone who kicks his ass gets called a "troll". He lives in a world of
> trolls by definition.

FWIW that kind of sig is truly, inutterably vulgar and reflects much
more badly on the type of person who would publish it than anyone named
in it.

On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 05:58:40 +1000, canetoad wrote:

>>Chrissy Cruiser wrote:
>>>
>>>>John Corliss in his sig line bleated:
>>>>
>>>>I don't reply to trolls, especially "Chrissy Cruiser".
>>>>**************************************
>>>>
>>>>LOL
>>>
>>>hehe, I saw that and meant to ask you what you had done wrong. Are you
>>>upset?
>>
>> Terribly upset, I say, nearly beyond words. Johnny's a child wrapped in an
>> adult body.
>>
>> Anyone who kicks his ass gets called a "troll". He lives in a world of
>> trolls by definition.
>
> FWIW that kind of sig is truly, inutterably vulgar and reflects much
> more badly on the type of person who would publish it than anyone named
> in it.

I'm with you on that canetoad regardless of what the mindless
CorlissSlurpers defense of this liar/admitted troll activities.
--
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/gen/page1116.html