PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows XP
Windows XP Performance
Backup Utility/Software Input Needed
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows XP
Windows XP Performance
Backup Utility/Software Input Needed
![]() |
Backup Utility/Software Input Needed |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have used Windows XP Backup Utility and been happy with the recovery
ability of files from the backup. Looking at the following site, it appears that the Automated System Recovery feature should allow recovery from a complete hard drive failure. Is this true and can it be trusted? http://www.windows-help.net/WindowsXP/howto-18.html Are there advantages to using products like Drive Image 7 and Ghost 2003? Which is better? Due to the high percentage on CNET that didn't recommend and provided negative feedback, I am uncertain what would be the best backup process and software that will allow recovery from a complete hard drive failure. Thoughts? http://reviews.cnet.com/4505-3682_7...html?tag=search http://reviews.cnet.com/PowerQuest_..._7-9850156.html |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Can't comment on ASR, as I'm not a user.
Backup techniques and philosophy are largely a matter of opinion. The only incontrovertible truth is that you must backup. So understand that what follows is only my opinion. You should seek out other opinions as well. I'm very enthusiatic about Norton Ghost. I find the program very powerful, flexible and totally reliable. I have relied on it in several critical situations and it has never failed me. However, Ghost is not a simple program, which is why it's generally recommended for experienced users. There is a lot to read and understand before it can be used to best effect. By the way, the latest version of Ghost is Ghost 2003. I used Drive Image in the past and it did not work properly for me. In any case, Drive Image is now owned by Symantec, so you can expect it to be absorbed into Ghost eventually. Other people hate Ghost and/or anything coming from Symantec. You might also want to look at TrueImage, by Acronis, and BootIt Next Generation (known as BING.) It's always good to have a second line of defense when backing up. In my case, in addition to using Ghost regularly, I copy all my important users files to DVD monthly. Rocky "InfoQuest" <InfoQuest@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:0Z5pc.4319$hH.101371@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... > I have used Windows XP Backup Utility and been happy with the recovery > ability of files from the backup. Looking at the following site, it appears > that the Automated System Recovery feature should allow recovery from a > complete hard drive failure. Is this true and can it be trusted? > > http://www.windows-help.net/WindowsXP/howto-18.html > > Are there advantages to using products like Drive Image 7 and Ghost 2003? > Which is better? Due to the high percentage on CNET that didn't recommend > and provided negative feedback, I am uncertain what would be the best backup > process and software that will allow recovery from a complete hard drive > failure. Thoughts? > > http://reviews.cnet.com/4505-3682_7...html?tag=search > > http://reviews.cnet.com/PowerQuest_..._7-9850156.html > > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

