PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Anti-Virus
britney and Symantec Corp
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Anti-Virus
britney and Symantec Corp
![]() |
britney and Symantec Corp |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
So easily recognizable as a virus or trojan is britney.scr. I check it with updated Trojan remover....says it's clean I check it with updated Nortons....says it's clean. Double click it (I know, I know....) and the Norton warning goes off about quarantining a trojan (might be phatbot) then Nortons disappears, won't start, and I must clean up the mess. The question is, why would Norton NOT recognize it when I say "scan the file" but once it starts, Norton notices, and then can't seem to protect itself? No flames about the double click. TIA ---tns |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"TNS" <TNS@nospamintexasoranywhereelse.com> wrote in message news:if4q501ucc079gjdh8j9ote6l1ht9i0mkd@4ax.com... > > So easily recognizable as a virus or trojan is britney.scr. > I check it with updated Trojan remover....says it's clean Not really I think. Perhaps it said it found nothing suspicious? > I check it with updated Nortons....says it's clean. Same as above? > Double click it (I know, I know....) and the Norton warning goes off > about quarantining a trojan (might be phatbot) then Nortons > disappears, won't start, and I must clean up the mess. The fact that it has recognized "something" tells me that the already running executable was able to drop something that *was* recognizeable as well as whatever else it might have done. Since the program was already running you cannot "prevent" its actions unless the "preventing" program is able to recognize a malicious process and stop the process - the "preventing" program runs in its own time slice as does the malicious process, so by the time a malicious process gets recognized it may be too late to prevent damage Unrecognizeable malware runs and drops recognizeable malware and initiates "AppKill" to disable the AV, firewall, whatever. The AV says "alert trojan detec{ackkkk}and dies. The unrecognizeable malware continues to do whatever it was programmed to do. > The question is, why would Norton NOT recognize it when I say "scan > the file" Packed or encrypted with an unsupported runtime unpacker or encryptor maybe? Or maybe it was just something new? Just guessing. > but once it starts, Norton notices, and then can't seem to protect itself? Norton (or any AV) can't protect you from yourself, *you* ran the executable that Norton told you basically nothing about. 'No malware found' does not mean 'no malware present' only 'no malware found'. If the malware in question gets spread around enough then maybe they will add detection for it - if you weren't so eager to be the first one on the block to get burnt (i.e. a "cooling off" period for programs of questionable nature) would likely have prevented this mess because someone else would play the "canary in the coalmine". It is a good thing it wasn't a BIOS flash routine huh? I know...I know... --you know already. ;o) |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks for the info
![]() > >It is a good thing it wasn't a BIOS flash routine huh?<--You got that right! I was pretty sure it was a trojan, and it was. I think my experimenting days are over, though. I can stay clean if I want ![]() Your information was quite informative! Thanks! ---tns! > >I know...I know... --you know already. ;o) > > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 


