PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Anti-Virus
Trojan or Address Spoofing?
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Anti-Virus
Trojan or Address Spoofing?
![]() |
Trojan or Address Spoofing? |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Just received a message from
Network Associates Webshield - e-mail Content Alert Stating that: "The email server, viruswall3.fullerton.edu, did not deliver the message from [my email address] to <helpdesk@exchange.fullerton.edu> with the subject "Re: Excel file" because the message contains 1 or more files with ".pif" extension(s)". I never sent any such email. I've read of others receiving a virus in the form of an excel.pif file. Does this indicate that I have some type of trojan sending such email without my knowledge or someone spoofing my address? Running XP with Norton Internet Security. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Mark" <granmark@DELETEyahoo.com> wrote:
> Just received a message from > Network Associates Webshield - e-mail Content Alert > > Stating that: > > "The email server, viruswall3.fullerton.edu, did not deliver the message > from [my email address] to <helpdesk@exchange.fullerton.edu> with the subject > "Re: Excel file" because the message contains 1 or more files with ".pif" > extension(s)". > I never sent any such email. I've read of others receiving a virus in the > form of an excel.pif file. Does this indicate that I have some type of > trojan sending such email without my knowledge or someone spoofing my > address? Running XP with Norton Internet Security. Nope, most likely its a mass mailer, and someone with your email address in their address book has been infected. The WebShield products allow you to block by (single and/or double) extension, so the people who received the mail are basically blocking .PIF at the gateway, and sending a mail back to tell the apparent author why the mail did not get through. If it had not been blocking by extension before scanning, you would have probably been told what the virus was - however the rejected the mail purely on extension. In your case and in today's climate of NetSky and its mates, it *sounds* like your email addy has been spoofed, so you are the one getting the alert back, not the truly infected machine. However, it does not harm to make sure your own Antivirus is bang up to date, and to scan you local machine to make sure it is not you. Cheers, ..\/.artin |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It's so annoying. I awoke to no less than seven angry emails this morning
berating me for sending them an infected file. *sigh* Becky "Wrangler" <Wrangle@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:405c8424$0$3309$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com... > "Mark" <granmark@DELETEyahoo.com> wrote: > > Just received a message from > > Network Associates Webshield - e-mail Content Alert > > > > Stating that: > > > > "The email server, viruswall3.fullerton.edu, did not deliver the message > > from [my email address] to <helpdesk@exchange.fullerton.edu> with the > subject > > "Re: Excel file" because the message contains 1 or more files with ".pif" > > extension(s)". > > > I never sent any such email. I've read of others receiving a virus in the > > form of an excel.pif file. Does this indicate that I have some type of > > trojan sending such email without my knowledge or someone spoofing my > > address? Running XP with Norton Internet Security. > > Nope, most likely its a mass mailer, and someone with your email address in > their address book has been infected. > > The WebShield products allow you to block by (single and/or double) > extension, so the people who received the mail are basically blocking .PIF > at the gateway, and sending a mail back to tell the apparent author why the > mail did not get through. If it had not been blocking by extension before > scanning, you would have probably been told what the virus was - however the > rejected the mail purely on extension. > > In your case and in today's climate of NetSky and its mates, it *sounds* > like your email addy has been spoofed, so you are the one getting the alert > back, not the truly infected machine. > > However, it does not harm to make sure your own Antivirus is bang up to > date, and to scan you local machine to make sure it is not you. > > Cheers, > > .\/.artin > > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

