PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Anti-Virus
amavis unable to deal with encrypted files?
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Anti-Virus
amavis unable to deal with encrypted files?
![]() |
amavis unable to deal with encrypted files? |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello
I have got an e-mail-gateway secured with amavisd and Sophos sweep. It keeps infinitely requeuing mails with encrypted attachments (MS-Office and zip). Sweep invoked manually (sweep -archive) doesn't have a problem with an encrypted test-zipfile. Therefore I suspect amavis itself to cause the trouble. Does somebody know this problem? Do I really need to patch amavis (http://www.amavis.org/contrib/) or is there another way? Regards Peter -- Address-information and information about persons in this posting must not be used for commercial purposes. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ok... talking to myself... maybe somebody else is mildly interested too...
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:35:28 +0100, Peter Guhl <virustester@every-net.ch> wrote: > I have got an e-mail-gateway secured with amavisd and Sophos sweep. It > keeps infinitely requeuing mails with encrypted attachments (MS-Office > and zip). Sweep invoked manually (sweep -archive) doesn't have a problem > with an encrypted test-zipfile. That's because sweep knows what it has done - and reports that there have been files it could not scan. This does, however, not seem to be clearly reported in the return code. > Therefore I suspect amavis itself to cause the trouble. Does somebody > know this problem? Do I really need to patch amavis > (http://www.amavis.org/contrib/) or is there another way? I did write a patch myself. Sweep's error code 2 is threated, the paranoid way, as an error stopping the process. If Amavis threats it as "OK" instead the show goes on. The drawback: It means loosening security. The error code 2 belongs not only to encrypted files but to any files sweep hat do skip - or even to some sweep-internal errors. A malfunctioning sweep will now cause mail to be delivered instead of beeing stopped. This is just a shor hack... does somebody know if there's already a patch which does detect encrypted files itself and prepares the system to handle sweep's failure differently in just that special case? Regards Peter -- Address-information and information about persons in this posting must not be used for commercial purposes. |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

