Re: Talaing enjoy ;-)

Unless the participants are going to sign photos from the event, why are you
posting it in an autographs group?

--

Mike
Gummby3

~~ Star Collector ~~
www.star-collector.net
Autograph Authentication Guide
www.star-collector.net/authenticationguide.htm

"christinA eijkhout" <hamstermumke@xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:fspmbs12bklmnst238dqfgde74167kpivc@4ax.com...
> Talaing enjoy ;-)
>
> This month, on the meeting of Sunday 28 March the Werfkelder organises
> a workshop BDSM for beginners. Most likely it will take place before
> the normal starting time. If desired the acquired skills can be brought
> in practice during the ordinary meeting. On the programme in any case
> "bondage" and "whips" stand. A vast notice follows in the regular
> invitation for the meeting itself,but we request interested people to
> send an email in advance. send mail to: hamstermumke@xs4all.nl
> and of course the date to note:-)
>
> cineritious cyanopsia cyclomyarian


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.598 / Virus Database: 380 - Release Date: 2/28/2004

"Gummby3" <gummby3@txucom.net> schreef in bericht
news:4057950d$1@katy-news.txucom.net...
> Unless the participants are going to sign photos from the event, why are
you
> posting it in an autographs group?
>
> --
>
> Mike
> Gummby3
>
> ~~ Star Collector ~~
> www.star-collector.net
> Autograph Authentication Guide
> www.star-collector.net/authenticationguide.htm
>
> "christinA eijkhout" <hamstermumke@xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:fspmbs12bklmnst238dqfgde74167kpivc@4ax.com...
> > Talaing enjoy ;-)
> >
> > This month, on the meeting of Sunday 28 March the Werfkelder organises
> > a workshop BDSM for beginners. Most likely it will take place before
> > the normal starting time. If desired the acquired skills can be brought
> > in practice during the ordinary meeting. On the programme in any case
> > "bondage" and "whips" stand. A vast notice follows in the regular
> > invitation for the meeting itself,but we request interested people to
> > send an email in advance. send mail to: hamstermumke@xs4all.nl
> > and of course the date to note:-)
> >
> > cineritious cyanopsia cyclomyarian
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.598 / Virus Database: 380 - Release Date: 2/28/2004
>
>

Ploink

"Gummby3" wrote:

[snip]

> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.598 / Virus Database: 380 - Release Date:
2/28/2004


Certified? By whom?

Virus defs are almost 3 weeks old!

Should have also been posted in alt.self-delusional...


Len Agoado
agoado@msn.com

Considering this has absolutely nothing to do with autograph collecting,
I'll keep this off topic short and sweet.

Mr. Agoado:

1) How am I supposed to answer this when you have erased all of the posting
information. I have no idea when I posted this message that you have
quoted, so I have nothing to compare the virus update date with.

2) My virus scanner is updated every 3 days (or when emergency updates have
been released.

3) What crawled up your nether regions to begin with? You're not even using
any type of virus scanner that we can determine. Are you someone that
transmits the viruses and you are upset that I use a blocker?

Talk about delusional... Talk about autograph collecting or go back to your
troll hill.

--

Mike
Gummby3


"Leonard Agoado" <len@mwswire.com> wrote in message
news:_G06c.26075$%06.7828@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Gummby3" wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.598 / Virus Database: 380 - Release Date:
> 2/28/2004
>
>
> Certified? By whom?
>
> Virus defs are almost 3 weeks old!
>
> Should have also been posted in alt.self-delusional...
>
>
> Len Agoado
> agoado@msn.com


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.631 / Virus Database: 404 - Release Date: 3/17/2004

You posted on 3/16 and AVG generated --
"---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.598 / Virus Database: 380 - Release Date: 2/28/2004"

Like Mr. Agoado said, its OLD.

I am using McAfee VirusScan v7.1 ENGINE 4320 and DAT v4339 - can you tell ? No and that is
the way it SHOULD be. If you had been in a.c.v and/or a.c.a-v for a while you would
know that it has long been a contention that is is STUPID to certify email or UseNet posts
as "virus free" beacase it is virtually impossible to certify "virus free."

It those weeks that AVG had not been updated there has been a virtual war between the
authors of Netsky and Bagle and almost daily, new variations are running rampanty around the
Internet. Both are mass mailing worms.

W32/Bagle@MM - http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_100965.htm

W32/Netsky.a@MM - http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_101027.htm

Now re-think what is "delusional". You "could have been" infected by W32/Bagle.p@MM and
sent email as "Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free." when in reality your platform was
infected.

Food for thought...

Dave



"Gummby3" <gummby3@txucom.net> wrote in message news:4058d167$1@katy-news.txucom.net...
| Considering this has absolutely nothing to do with autograph collecting,
| I'll keep this off topic short and sweet.
|
| Mr. Agoado:
|
| 1) How am I supposed to answer this when you have erased all of the posting
| information. I have no idea when I posted this message that you have
| quoted, so I have nothing to compare the virus update date with.
|
| 2) My virus scanner is updated every 3 days (or when emergency updates have
| been released.
|
| 3) What crawled up your nether regions to begin with? You're not even using
| any type of virus scanner that we can determine. Are you someone that
| transmits the viruses and you are upset that I use a blocker?
|
| Talk about delusional... Talk about autograph collecting or go back to your
| troll hill.
|
| --
|
| Mike
| Gummby3
|
|
| "Leonard Agoado" <len@mwswire.com> wrote in message
| news:_G06c.26075$%06.7828@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
| >
| > "Gummby3" wrote:
| >
| > [snip]
| >
| > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
| > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
| > > Version: 6.0.598 / Virus Database: 380 - Release Date:
| > 2/28/2004
| >
| >
| > Certified? By whom?
| >
| > Virus defs are almost 3 weeks old!
| >
| > Should have also been posted in alt.self-delusional...
| >
| >
| > Len Agoado
| > agoado@msn.com
|
|
| ---
| Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
| Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
| Version: 6.0.631 / Virus Database: 404 - Release Date: 3/17/2004
|
|

Again, this is off topic for the group and it is my final say on it.

1) I checked my settings and there had been a problem with it updating. I
have fixed that. 2) If Mr. Agoado had simply sent a message stating "Hey,
you might want to check your virus status" instead of coming across like a
high and mighty jerk with a stick up his A**, then that would have been
different. I would have been thankful for the insight and I would have
looked into the problem. INSTEAD, he comes across with an unwarranted slam.
3) I did not create the virus scanner program that I use. It is set to scan
my system and it sends the statement out with all messages that I post. No
big deal. I have since scanned my system today with two different scanners
and everything came up negative on viruses. No harm. No foul.

>If you had been in a.c.v and/or a.c.a-v for a while you would
> know that it has long been a contention that is is STUPID to certify email
or UseNet posts
> as "virus free" beacase it is virtually impossible to certify "virus
free."
4) I honestly have no idea what you are talking about (ie "a.c.v and/or
a.c.a-v") and resent being talked down to. This bozo comes in to an
autograph collecting discussion board and slams me for no reason.
5) As for being safe, I normally use a backup scanner to check my system
ever other day. I don't trust my system to a solo scanner. No single virus
scanner is infalable. If someone is stupid enough to open an attachment
from someone that they don't know, then they take their risks.

As I stated, this is my final reply to this topic. No matter how backhanded
the assistance was, I took it to heart and it is running smoothly again.

I'll be more than happy to talk to either of you two gentlemen about
autograph collecting, otherwise, I see no reason to be bothered with posts
from you on this topic again.

Have a good one.

--

Mike
Gummby3


"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
news:if56c.29336$Eg3.17812@nwrdny01.gnilink.net...
> You posted on 3/16 and AVG generated --
> "---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.598 / Virus Database: 380 - Release Date: 2/28/2004"
>
> Like Mr. Agoado said, its OLD.
>
> I am using McAfee VirusScan v7.1 ENGINE 4320 and DAT v4339 - can you tell
? No and that is
> the way it SHOULD be. If you had been in a.c.v and/or a.c.a-v for
a while you would
> know that it has long been a contention that is is STUPID to certify email
or UseNet posts
> as "virus free" beacase it is virtually impossible to certify "virus
free."
>
> It those weeks that AVG had not been updated there has been a virtual war
between the
> authors of Netsky and Bagle and almost daily, new variations are running
rampanty around the
> Internet. Both are mass mailing worms.
>
> W32/Bagle@MM - http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_100965.htm
>
> W32/Netsky.a@MM - http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_101027.htm
>
> Now re-think what is "delusional". You "could have been" infected by
W32/Bagle.p@MM and
> sent email as "Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free." when in reality
your platform was
> infected.
>
> Food for thought...
>
> Dave


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.631 / Virus Database: 404 - Release Date: 3/17/2004

Quoth the raven named Gummby3:

....
> free." 4) I honestly have no idea what you are talking about (ie
> "a.c.v and/or a.c.a-v") and resent being talked down to.

> This bozo comes in to an autograph collecting discussion board and
> slams me for no reason.

No, he didn't come into an autograph board. You haven't noticed all
the groups this thread is cross-posted to. Peek at the headers and you
will find:

Newsgroups:
alt.collecting.autographs,alt.comedy.standup,alt.comp.anti-virus,nl.support.stop-met-roken,nl.comp.virus

He didn't "slam" you. Welcome to Usenet.

In the anti-virus group, your sig is funny because it is meaningless,
especially the old one from your last post. There is no way your mail
or posts can be 'certified' virus free.

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.631 / Virus Database: 404 - Release Date: 3/17/2004

...but we see that the hinting has been understood.

--
-bts - posting from a.c.a-v
-This space intentionally left blank.

Mike, you don't have to reply -- but I hope you'll read this...

a.c.v -- shorthand for; alt.comp.virus
a.c.a-v -- shorthand for; alt.comp.anti-virus

Blame the lame a$$ spammer for the crosspost but, this thread is in; alt.comp.anti-virus so
whay is Off topic for one News Group is apropos for another.

Good Luck !

Dave



"Gummby3" <gummby3@[SPAM sucks remove to respond to me)txucom.net> wrote in message
news:4058f5d4$1@katy-news.txucom.net...
| Again, this is off topic for the group and it is my final say on it.
|
| 1) I checked my settings and there had been a problem with it updating. I
| have fixed that. 2) If Mr. Agoado had simply sent a message stating "Hey,
| you might want to check your virus status" instead of coming across like a
| high and mighty jerk with a stick up his A**, then that would have been
| different. I would have been thankful for the insight and I would have
| looked into the problem. INSTEAD, he comes across with an unwarranted slam.
| 3) I did not create the virus scanner program that I use. It is set to scan
| my system and it sends the statement out with all messages that I post. No
| big deal. I have since scanned my system today with two different scanners
| and everything came up negative on viruses. No harm. No foul.
|
| >If you had been in a.c.v and/or a.c.a-v for a while you would
| > know that it has long been a contention that is is STUPID to certify email
| or UseNet posts
| > as "virus free" beacase it is virtually impossible to certify "virus
| free."
| 4) I honestly have no idea what you are talking about (ie "a.c.v and/or
| a.c.a-v") and resent being talked down to. This bozo comes in to an
| autograph collecting discussion board and slams me for no reason.
| 5) As for being safe, I normally use a backup scanner to check my system
| ever other day. I don't trust my system to a solo scanner. No single virus
| scanner is infalable. If someone is stupid enough to open an attachment
| from someone that they don't know, then they take their risks.
|
| As I stated, this is my final reply to this topic. No matter how backhanded
| the assistance was, I took it to heart and it is running smoothly again.
|
| I'll be more than happy to talk to either of you two gentlemen about
| autograph collecting, otherwise, I see no reason to be bothered with posts
| from you on this topic again.
|
| Have a good one.
|
| --
|
| Mike
| Gummby3

| ---
| Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
| Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
| Version: 6.0.631 / Virus Database: 404 - Release Date: 3/17/2004
|
|

Gummby3 wrote:
[snip]
> 2) If Mr. Agoado had simply sent a message stating "Hey,
> you might want to check your virus status" instead of coming across like a
> high and mighty jerk with a stick up his A**, then that would have been
> different. I would have been thankful for the insight and I would have
> looked into the problem. INSTEAD, he comes across with an unwarranted slam.

the thing is 'your virus status' was not the only problem... there was
also the matter of those known-to-be-false statements it adds to
messages...

> 3) I did not create the virus scanner program that I use. It is set to scan
> my system and it sends the statement out with all messages that I post. No
> big deal.

no big deal except for the fact that the statement it adds is a *lie*...

> I have since scanned my system today with two different scanners
> and everything came up negative on viruses. No harm. No foul.

i would say the false sense of security it promotes is harm...

>>If you had been in a.c.v and/or a.c.a-v for a while you would
>>know that it has long been a contention that is is STUPID to certify email
>
> or UseNet posts
>
>>as "virus free" beacase it is virtually impossible to certify "virus
>
> free."
> 4) I honestly have no idea what you are talking about (ie "a.c.v and/or
> a.c.a-v") and resent being talked down to. This bozo comes in to an
> autograph collecting discussion board and slams me for no reason.

check the headers - this thread is cross posted to a number of
newsgroups... alt.comp.anti-virus (a.c.a-v) happens to be one of
them... the reference is probably due to the fact that the subject of
avg's snake oilsmanship with regard to that certification message has
come up many times in alt.comp.virus and alt.comp.anti-virus...

--
"we're the first ones to starve, we're the first ones to die
the first ones in line for that pie in the sky
and we're always the last when the cream is shared out
for the worker is working when the fat cat's about"

"Gummby3" wrote:

> Considering this has absolutely nothing
> to do with autograph collecting,

Well, I was responding to your
post which appeared in

alt.collecting.autographs
alt.comedy.standup
alt.comp.anti-virus
nl.support.stop-met-roken
nl.comp.virus

That makes my post directly on-topic in
at least two groups. More, if you regard
viruses as an issue of general interest in the
broader Usenet community.

I will grant that your post could very well
have been on-topic in alt.comedy.standup.
Of course that's for you to determine since
you designated the recipient groups of the
message to which I replied.

You do know to tell where you are posting, right?


> How am I supposed to answer this when you
> have erased all of the posting information.

Huh? I have erased nothing. I simply did not
reinterate the your entire message in my reply.
Your original gem is still propagating through
Usenet unimpeded.


> I have no idea when I posted this message
> that you have quoted, so I have nothing...

You don't have a Sent Items folder?


> My virus scanner is updated every 3 days
> (or when emergency updates have been released.

That's not what it tells us...


> What crawled up your nether regions to begin with?

Isn't that a bit personal? You could at least buy dinner
first...


> You're not even using any type of virus scanner that
> we can determine.

Absent a meaningless assertion of certification,
the boundaries of knowledge are not defined
by what one can determine from a Usenet post.

Also, to whom does "we" refer? Is this much
posturing a two person project? Don't they monitor
Internet access in the Junior High Library any more?


> Are you someone that transmits the viruses
> and you are upset that I use a blocker?

LOL! Use a blocker, and we'll see.


> Talk about autograph collecting
> or go back to your troll hill.

Can I have your autograph?



Len Agoado
agoado@msn.com