PC Review Forums Newsgroups Hardware Anti-Virus NAV vs AVG

Reply

NAV vs AVG

 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 16-01-2004, 05:29 PM   #1
Fred
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default NAV vs AVG


I have a years subscription to NAV I got before I found AVG freeware.

Which should I use for what? (Which is "better" for what).

Which one for resident, which one for boot, which one for disk scans?

Fred


  Reply With Quote
Old 16-01-2004, 10:53 PM   #2
MJD
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NAV vs AVG

Whatever you decide, DON'T try to run both of them on the same machine.
Its a lot easier to remove AVG than NAV.
"Fred" <spamfred@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:k3VNb.12901$R85.6703@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
> I have a years subscription to NAV I got before I found AVG freeware.
>
> Which should I use for what? (Which is "better" for what).
>
> Which one for resident, which one for boot, which one for disk scans?
>
> Fred
>
>



  Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2004, 12:00 AM   #3
Nel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NAV vs AVG

Hi
What happens if he try's to run both?....Nel


> Whatever you decide, DON'T try to run both of them on the same machine.
> Its a lot easier to remove AVG than NAV.
> "Fred" <spamfred@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> news:k3VNb.12901$R85.6703@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
> > I have a years subscription to NAV I got before I found AVG freeware.
> >
> > Which should I use for what? (Which is "better" for what).
> >
> > Which one for resident, which one for boot, which one for disk scans?
> >
> > Fred
> >
> >

>
>



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.560 / Virus Database: 352 - Release Date: 1/8/04


  Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2004, 10:46 AM   #4
MJD
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NAV vs AVG

They 'fight'.
There are less genteel descriptions.
Basically, you'll end up with a very bad impression of both of them.
"Nel" <yainel@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:8W_Nb.25262$5i2.20258@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
> Hi
> What happens if he try's to run both?....Nel
>
>
> > Whatever you decide, DON'T try to run both of them on the same machine.
> > Its a lot easier to remove AVG than NAV.
> > "Fred" <spamfred@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> > news:k3VNb.12901$R85.6703@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
> > > I have a years subscription to NAV I got before I found AVG freeware.
> > >
> > > Which should I use for what? (Which is "better" for what).
> > >
> > > Which one for resident, which one for boot, which one for disk scans?
> > >
> > > Fred
> > >
> > >

> >
> >

>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.560 / Virus Database: 352 - Release Date: 1/8/04
>
>



  Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2004, 10:33 PM   #5
Nel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NAV vs AVG

Hi,
My year for McAfee ran out about 6 months ago, so I installed AVG.
The dat files aren't up to date in Mcafee, so should I uninstall it?
Thanks, Nel

> They 'fight'.
> There are less genteel descriptions.
> Basically, you'll end up with a very bad impression of both of them.
> "Nel" <yainel@nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:8W_Nb.25262$5i2.20258@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
> > Hi
> > What happens if he try's to run both?....Nel
> >
> >
> > > Whatever you decide, DON'T try to run both of them on the same

machine.
> > > Its a lot easier to remove AVG than NAV.
> > > "Fred" <spamfred@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> > > news:k3VNb.12901$R85.6703@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
> > > > I have a years subscription to NAV I got before I found AVG

freeware.
> > > >
> > > > Which should I use for what? (Which is "better" for what).
> > > >
> > > > Which one for resident, which one for boot, which one for disk

scans?
> > > >
> > > > Fred
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >

> >
> >
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.560 / Virus Database: 352 - Release Date: 1/8/04
> >
> >

>
>



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.561 / Virus Database: 353 - Release Date: 1/13/04


  Reply With Quote
Old 18-01-2004, 07:35 PM   #6
BoB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NAV vs AVG

On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 22:33:10 GMT, "Nel" <yainel@nospam.net> wrote:

>Hi,
> My year for McAfee ran out about 6 months ago, so I installed AVG.
>The dat files aren't up to date in Mcafee, so should I uninstall it?
> Thanks, Nel


Assuming you have no intention of investing more $ in McAfee,
uninstall it.

If you decide you want an additional AV for second opinions of
'suspect' files, there are 'more' good, free AVs available.

BoB

  Reply With Quote
Old 18-01-2004, 10:31 PM   #7
Nel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NAV vs AVG

Thanks Bob, for your reply.

I have a2start center, ad-aware, spybot and zone alarm. Is there a
different one that I should have in place of AVG? You'd think that would be
over kill, but I still keep getting JSFortnight back about once a month. I
hear it's hard to get rid of.
Thanks again, Nel

>
> >Hi,
> > My year for McAfee ran out about 6 months ago, so I installed AVG.
> >The dat files aren't up to date in Mcafee, so should I uninstall it?
> > Thanks, Nel

>
> Assuming you have no intention of investing more $ in McAfee,
> uninstall it.
>
> If you decide you want an additional AV for second opinions of
> 'suspect' files, there are 'more' good, free AVs available.
>
> BoB
>



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.562 / Virus Database: 354 - Release Date: 1/16/04


  Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-2004, 06:08 AM   #8
Richard Steven Hack
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NAV vs AVG

On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:31:28 GMT, "Nel" <yainel@nospam.net> wrote:

> I have a2start center, ad-aware, spybot and zone alarm. Is there a
>different one that I should have in place of AVG?


None of those (what is "a2start center" - I can't even find it in
Google) are anti-viruses and thus do not do what AVG does, which is
anti-virus. Ad-Aware and SpyBot remove spyware, ZoneAlarm is a
firewall. None of those are AVs. You need all 3 types of software:
AV, firewall, and anti-spyware.


--
Richard Steven Hack
"Whatever does not kill me makes me stronger" -
and YOU have not killed me!
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-01-2004, 01:34 PM   #9
Reg Mouatt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NAV vs AVG

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:29:40 -0500, "Fred" <spamfred@bellsouth.net>
wrote:

>I have a years subscription to NAV I got before I found AVG freeware.
>
>Which should I use for what? (Which is "better" for what).
>
>Which one for resident, which one for boot, which one for disk scans?
>
>Fred


Hi,
I have recently removed Norton Internet Security 2004 incorporating
NAV from my PC and installed free AVG. Which is the better at the task
of virus spotting I do not know but as far as speed of operation the
only one is AVG. Whether this is from clicking on an icon to open the
menus or selecting a file and requesting a virus scan. The actual full
scan takes about one third of the time. If you like to have e-mails
scanned and use an e-mailer other than Microsoft Outlook or Outlook
Express that is also possible with an extra download but it is
something of a fag to configure it - for the download go to
http://www.grisoft.cz/beta/avgemc/avgemc_en.htm
If you download and need assistance with it, let me know.
Reg
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-01-2004, 05:03 PM   #10
BoB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NAV vs AVG

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 06:08:01 GMT, Richard Steven Hack
<richardhack@prontomail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:31:28 GMT, "Nel" <yainel@nospam.net> wrote:
>
>> I have a2start center, ad-aware, spybot and zone alarm. Is there a
>>different one that I should have in place of AVG?

>
>None of those (what is "a2start center" - I can't even find it in
>Google) are anti-viruses and thus do not do what AVG does, which is
>anti-virus. Ad-Aware and SpyBot remove spyware, ZoneAlarm is a
>firewall. None of those are AVs. You need all 3 types of software:
>AV, firewall, and anti-spyware.


info on a2:

Asquared is 'mainly' an anti-trojan that replaced Ants. I
don't recall Ants as being very effective. I say 'mainly'
because their homepage shows the numbers covered for trojans,
virus, worms, spyware, etc.

They have forum support and just registered 100,000 users. It
appears to be much improved over Ants, or can that many users
be wrong?

The free version only scans and is a 3meg DL.

BoB

  Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off