PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Anti-Virus
Newbie question : antivirus informations.
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Anti-Virus
Newbie question : antivirus informations.
![]() |
Newbie question : antivirus informations. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello antivirus master,
I have to make a paper for my boss, he wants me to compare different antivirus solutions in order to *maybe* change our old system. But when googling I could only find some really junk comparatives made by general web site (you should choose norton, is new interface is sooooo cute .....) or others made by antivirus compagnies themselves (We are the best, no lies ...). I am quite new in the antivirus field and I really would like to have your advice about it. Here are our specification : About 25 windows 2000 boxes for users (Office work/mails/few specific applications...) We host our own mail server using a windows 2000 box with navieg for an antivirus (we are quite unhappy of it) We really would like to use a linux based antivirus to check the incoming and outgoing mails. Our server are unix based systems, but for the moment we do not use any antivirus for them, do you think it is mandatory ? Finally the cost is for us a big issue as we are a poooooooor compagnie (snif sniff ![]() Any advice/link/ressource you could point me will be greatly appreciate ! Thank you very much Jerome |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well, I would have said you are a prime canidate for Sophos, until I read
the last line. Sophos has excellent centralized updates, e-mail scanning at the server and protection for your Unix based systems. It also has excellent detection rates and is not a resource hog. Unfortunately it is not cheap. Then again, neither is shutting down your network to clean a virus that slips through. "Schlum" <schlum-news-nexantis@schlum.info> wrote in message news:3f569124$0$27055$626a54ce@news.free.fr... > Hello antivirus master, > > I have to make a paper for my boss, he wants me to compare different > antivirus solutions in order to *maybe* change our old system. But when > googling I could only find some really junk comparatives made by general > web site (you should choose norton, is new interface is sooooo cute > ....) or others made by antivirus compagnies themselves (We are the > best, no lies ...). > I am quite new in the antivirus field and I really would like to have > your advice about it. > > Here are our specification : > > About 25 windows 2000 boxes for users (Office work/mails/few specific > applications...) > We host our own mail server using a windows 2000 box with navieg for an > antivirus (we are quite unhappy of it) > We really would like to use a linux based antivirus to check the > incoming and outgoing mails. > Our server are unix based systems, but for the moment we do not use any > antivirus for them, do you think it is mandatory ? > Finally the cost is for us a big issue as we are a poooooooor compagnie > (snif sniff ![]() > > Any advice/link/ressource you could point me will be greatly appreciate ! > Thank you very much > > Jerome > |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you for your advice, I am checking Sophos web site for more
informations. I have another question : What about free AV like AVG (I mean for the users computer). I saw, it got the VB100% label lately, is it a good hint to rank a AV or just another bullshit label ? I am turning AVG now on my PC to try it, but I don't want to get some virus in my network just for "test" ![]() Any comment ? Thanks all, Schlum Jibefan wrote: > Well, I would have said you are a prime canidate for Sophos, until I read > the last line. > > Sophos has excellent centralized updates, e-mail scanning at the server and > protection for your Unix based systems. It also has excellent detection > rates and is not a resource hog. Unfortunately it is not cheap. Then again, > neither is shutting down your network to clean a virus that slips through. > > "Schlum" <schlum-news-nexantis@schlum.info> wrote in message > news:3f569124$0$27055$626a54ce@news.free.fr... > >>Hello antivirus master, >> >>I have to make a paper for my boss, he wants me to compare different >>antivirus solutions in order to *maybe* change our old system. But when >>googling I could only find some really junk comparatives made by general >>web site (you should choose norton, is new interface is sooooo cute >>....) or others made by antivirus compagnies themselves (We are the >>best, no lies ...). >>I am quite new in the antivirus field and I really would like to have >>your advice about it. >> >>Here are our specification : >> >>About 25 windows 2000 boxes for users (Office work/mails/few specific >>applications...) >>We host our own mail server using a windows 2000 box with navieg for an >>antivirus (we are quite unhappy of it) >>We really would like to use a linux based antivirus to check the >>incoming and outgoing mails. >>Our server are unix based systems, but for the moment we do not use any >>antivirus for them, do you think it is mandatory ? >>Finally the cost is for us a big issue as we are a poooooooor compagnie >>(snif sniff ![]() >> >>Any advice/link/ressource you could point me will be greatly appreciate ! >>Thank you very much >> >>Jerome >> > > > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well, here is my full 2 cents worth.
First let me tell you my credentials. I am a consultant/reseller with 15 yrs. experience. I currently have ~150 clients that range in size from single systems up to a $6 billion dollar/yr. corporation. Basically I tell these people what to do with their PC dollar. As for AVG, I have no experience with it. I am about to uninstall Sophos from my home system and install AVG for testing. I have heard great things about it here and there seem to be some very knowledgeable people here. I think it would be a wonderful thing for home users, provided it works as well as everyone says. For a company, who relies on their pc's (more than they think), I would prefer to have something that has support behind it. When you are in the situation that I am, supporting the nuimber of users I do, you need to have some sort of support system behind you. I currently recommend 2 virus packages, depending on the situation. For small networks or single users, I usually recommend Norman. (www.norman.com) It is a good virus software that has a small footprint (in terms of system resources) and is rock solid. It is reasonably priced ($40/yr.) and has solid automatic updating. I have it installed at ~20 or so sites with no problems. I recommend Sophos for anyone who needs centralized updates, mail server protection, or Linux protection. I feel that Sophos is the Rolls Royce of AV software. Out of all the packages I have ever worked with it has the best centralized updates, excellent centralized monitoring, and world class technical support. They also include a product called Remote Update that will allow updating to remote sites via a web interface. Their one drawback is that they are a little expensive, but you should also consider that the license includes protection for all of your employees home systems. So for 25 users you would be looking at around $1250.00 per year including your server and mail monitor protection. At $50.00 per user (including servers and the users home systems) that is really not a bad deal. If you are interested in Sophos, call me @ 214.850.5469. I can put you in touch with a company who is a Sophos reseller that can process your order. They have their own Technical Support staff who are top notch and that gives you an additional layer of support. OK. So maybe that was more like $2 worth. I am off to start my eval of AVG! "Schlum" <schlum-news-nexantis@schlum.info> wrote in message news:3f57e0b2$0$6193$626a54ce@news.free.fr... > Thank you for your advice, I am checking Sophos web site for more > informations. > > I have another question : What about free AV like AVG (I mean for the > users computer). I saw, it got the VB100% label lately, is it a good > hint to rank a AV or just another bullshit label ? > > I am turning AVG now on my PC to try it, but I don't want to get some > virus in my network just for "test" ![]() > > Any comment ? > > Thanks all, > > Schlum > > Jibefan wrote: > > Well, I would have said you are a prime canidate for Sophos, until I read > > the last line. > > > > Sophos has excellent centralized updates, e-mail scanning at the server and > > protection for your Unix based systems. It also has excellent detection > > rates and is not a resource hog. Unfortunately it is not cheap. Then again, > > neither is shutting down your network to clean a virus that slips through. > > > > "Schlum" <schlum-news-nexantis@schlum.info> wrote in message > > news:3f569124$0$27055$626a54ce@news.free.fr... > > > >>Hello antivirus master, > >> > >>I have to make a paper for my boss, he wants me to compare different > >>antivirus solutions in order to *maybe* change our old system. But when > >>googling I could only find some really junk comparatives made by general > >>web site (you should choose norton, is new interface is sooooo cute > >>....) or others made by antivirus compagnies themselves (We are the > >>best, no lies ...). > >>I am quite new in the antivirus field and I really would like to have > >>your advice about it. > >> > >>Here are our specification : > >> > >>About 25 windows 2000 boxes for users (Office work/mails/few specific > >>applications...) > >>We host our own mail server using a windows 2000 box with navieg for an > >>antivirus (we are quite unhappy of it) > >>We really would like to use a linux based antivirus to check the > >>incoming and outgoing mails. > >>Our server are unix based systems, but for the moment we do not use any > >>antivirus for them, do you think it is mandatory ? > >>Finally the cost is for us a big issue as we are a poooooooor compagnie > >>(snif sniff ![]() > >> > >>Any advice/link/ressource you could point me will be greatly appreciate ! > >>Thank you very much > >> > >>Jerome > >> > > > > > > > |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jibefan,
Thank you very much for the time you spent to answer me. I actually did need this kind of answer. I continue to do my report and will let you know what decision we take as soon as God (little name for the guy in charge here) made up his mind. By the way, I would be really interested in your comment about AVG when you finish your tests. All the best, Schlum Jibefan wrote: > Well, here is my full 2 cents worth. > > First let me tell you my credentials. I am a consultant/reseller with 15 > yrs. experience. I currently have ~150 clients that range in size from > single systems up to a $6 billion dollar/yr. corporation. Basically I tell > these people what to do with their PC dollar. > > As for AVG, I have no experience with it. I am about to uninstall Sophos > from my home system and install AVG for testing. I have heard great things > about it here and there seem to be some very knowledgeable people here. I > think it would be a wonderful thing for home users, provided it works as > well as everyone says. > > For a company, who relies on their pc's (more than they think), I would > prefer to have something that has support behind it. When you are in the > situation that I am, supporting the nuimber of users I do, you need to have > some sort of support system behind you. > > I currently recommend 2 virus packages, depending on the situation. For > small networks or single users, I usually recommend Norman. (www.norman.com) > It is a good virus software that has a small footprint (in terms of system > resources) and is rock solid. It is reasonably priced ($40/yr.) and has > solid automatic updating. I have it installed at ~20 or so sites with no > problems. > > I recommend Sophos for anyone who needs centralized updates, mail server > protection, or Linux protection. I feel that Sophos is the Rolls Royce of AV > software. Out of all the packages I have ever worked with it has the best > centralized updates, excellent centralized monitoring, and world class > technical support. They also include a product called Remote Update that > will allow updating to remote sites via a web interface. Their one drawback > is that they are a little expensive, but you should also consider that the > license includes protection for all of your employees home systems. So for > 25 users you would be looking at around $1250.00 per year including your > server and mail monitor protection. At $50.00 per user (including servers > and the users home systems) that is really not a bad deal. > > If you are interested in Sophos, call me @ 214.850.5469. I can put you in > touch with a company who is a Sophos reseller that can process your order. > They have their own Technical Support staff who are top notch and that gives > you an additional layer of support. > > OK. So maybe that was more like $2 worth. I am off to start my eval of AVG! > > > "Schlum" <schlum-news-nexantis@schlum.info> wrote in message > news:3f57e0b2$0$6193$626a54ce@news.free.fr... > >>Thank you for your advice, I am checking Sophos web site for more >>informations. >> >>I have another question : What about free AV like AVG (I mean for the >>users computer). I saw, it got the VB100% label lately, is it a good >>hint to rank a AV or just another bullshit label ? >> >>I am turning AVG now on my PC to try it, but I don't want to get some >>virus in my network just for "test" ![]() >> >>Any comment ? >> >>Thanks all, >> >>Schlum >> >>Jibefan wrote: >> >>>Well, I would have said you are a prime canidate for Sophos, until I > > read > >>>the last line. >>> >>>Sophos has excellent centralized updates, e-mail scanning at the server > > and > >>>protection for your Unix based systems. It also has excellent detection >>>rates and is not a resource hog. Unfortunately it is not cheap. Then > > again, > >>>neither is shutting down your network to clean a virus that slips > > through. > >>>"Schlum" <schlum-news-nexantis@schlum.info> wrote in message >>>news:3f569124$0$27055$626a54ce@news.free.fr... >>> >>> >>>>Hello antivirus master, >>>> >>>>I have to make a paper for my boss, he wants me to compare different >>>>antivirus solutions in order to *maybe* change our old system. But when >>>>googling I could only find some really junk comparatives made by general >>>>web site (you should choose norton, is new interface is sooooo cute >>>>....) or others made by antivirus compagnies themselves (We are the >>>>best, no lies ...). >>>>I am quite new in the antivirus field and I really would like to have >>>>your advice about it. >>>> >>>>Here are our specification : >>>> >>>>About 25 windows 2000 boxes for users (Office work/mails/few specific >>>>applications...) >>>>We host our own mail server using a windows 2000 box with navieg for an >>>>antivirus (we are quite unhappy of it) >>>>We really would like to use a linux based antivirus to check the >>>>incoming and outgoing mails. >>>>Our server are unix based systems, but for the moment we do not use any >>>>antivirus for them, do you think it is mandatory ? >>>>Finally the cost is for us a big issue as we are a poooooooor compagnie >>>>(snif sniff ![]() >>>> >>>>Any advice/link/ressource you could point me will be greatly appreciate > > ! > >>>>Thank you very much >>>> >>>>Jerome >>>> >>> >>> >>> > > |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <vlftea8kahk5db@corp.supernews.com>, Jibefan
<johnc@nova1.net> writes >Well, here is my full 2 cents worth. > >First let me tell you my credentials. I am a consultant/reseller with 15 >yrs. experience. I currently have ~150 clients that range in size from >single systems up to a $6 billion dollar/yr. corporation. Basically I tell >these people what to do with their PC dollar. > >As for AVG, I have no experience with it. I am about to uninstall Sophos >from my home system and install AVG for testing. I have heard great things >about it here and there seem to be some very knowledgeable people here. I >think it would be a wonderful thing for home users, provided it works as >well as everyone says. AVG scores very badly against most of the others. NOD32 by Eset is a terrific product which outscores most of the other virus checkers. Read about it here: http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/archives/products.xml -- Paul B The irony of the Information Age is that it has given new respectability to uninformed opinion. - John Lawton |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well, I couldn't even get AVG to download. I got some error message in a
foreign language when I tried to go to the download page. For me, the test is over. "Schlum" <schlum-news-nexantis@schlum.info> wrote in message news:3f57fb34$0$6197$626a54ce@news.free.fr... > Jibefan, > > Thank you very much for the time you spent to answer me. I actually did > need this kind of answer. I continue to do my report and will let you > know what decision we take as soon as God (little name for the guy in > charge here) made up his mind. > > By the way, I would be really interested in your comment about AVG when > you finish your tests. > > All the best, > > Schlum > > Jibefan wrote: > > Well, here is my full 2 cents worth. > > > > First let me tell you my credentials. I am a consultant/reseller with 15 > > yrs. experience. I currently have ~150 clients that range in size from > > single systems up to a $6 billion dollar/yr. corporation. Basically I tell > > these people what to do with their PC dollar. > > > > As for AVG, I have no experience with it. I am about to uninstall Sophos > > from my home system and install AVG for testing. I have heard great things > > about it here and there seem to be some very knowledgeable people here. I > > think it would be a wonderful thing for home users, provided it works as > > well as everyone says. > > > > For a company, who relies on their pc's (more than they think), I would > > prefer to have something that has support behind it. When you are in the > > situation that I am, supporting the nuimber of users I do, you need to have > > some sort of support system behind you. > > > > I currently recommend 2 virus packages, depending on the situation. For > > small networks or single users, I usually recommend Norman. (www.norman.com) > > It is a good virus software that has a small footprint (in terms of system > > resources) and is rock solid. It is reasonably priced ($40/yr.) and has > > solid automatic updating. I have it installed at ~20 or so sites with no > > problems. > > > > I recommend Sophos for anyone who needs centralized updates, mail server > > protection, or Linux protection. I feel that Sophos is the Rolls Royce of AV > > software. Out of all the packages I have ever worked with it has the best > > centralized updates, excellent centralized monitoring, and world class > > technical support. They also include a product called Remote Update that > > will allow updating to remote sites via a web interface. Their one drawback > > is that they are a little expensive, but you should also consider that the > > license includes protection for all of your employees home systems. So for > > 25 users you would be looking at around $1250.00 per year including your > > server and mail monitor protection. At $50.00 per user (including servers > > and the users home systems) that is really not a bad deal. > > > > If you are interested in Sophos, call me @ 214.850.5469. I can put you in > > touch with a company who is a Sophos reseller that can process your order. > > They have their own Technical Support staff who are top notch and that gives > > you an additional layer of support. > > > > OK. So maybe that was more like $2 worth. I am off to start my eval of AVG! > > > > > > "Schlum" <schlum-news-nexantis@schlum.info> wrote in message > > news:3f57e0b2$0$6193$626a54ce@news.free.fr... > > > >>Thank you for your advice, I am checking Sophos web site for more > >>informations. > >> > >>I have another question : What about free AV like AVG (I mean for the > >>users computer). I saw, it got the VB100% label lately, is it a good > >>hint to rank a AV or just another bullshit label ? > >> > >>I am turning AVG now on my PC to try it, but I don't want to get some > >>virus in my network just for "test" ![]() > >> > >>Any comment ? > >> > >>Thanks all, > >> > >>Schlum > >> > >>Jibefan wrote: > >> > >>>Well, I would have said you are a prime canidate for Sophos, until I > > > > read > > > >>>the last line. > >>> > >>>Sophos has excellent centralized updates, e-mail scanning at the server > > > > and > > > >>>protection for your Unix based systems. It also has excellent detection > >>>rates and is not a resource hog. Unfortunately it is not cheap. Then > > > > again, > > > >>>neither is shutting down your network to clean a virus that slips > > > > through. > > > >>>"Schlum" <schlum-news-nexantis@schlum.info> wrote in message > >>>news:3f569124$0$27055$626a54ce@news.free.fr... > >>> > >>> > >>>>Hello antivirus master, > >>>> > >>>>I have to make a paper for my boss, he wants me to compare different > >>>>antivirus solutions in order to *maybe* change our old system. But when > >>>>googling I could only find some really junk comparatives made by general > >>>>web site (you should choose norton, is new interface is sooooo cute > >>>>....) or others made by antivirus compagnies themselves (We are the > >>>>best, no lies ...). > >>>>I am quite new in the antivirus field and I really would like to have > >>>>your advice about it. > >>>> > >>>>Here are our specification : > >>>> > >>>>About 25 windows 2000 boxes for users (Office work/mails/few specific > >>>>applications...) > >>>>We host our own mail server using a windows 2000 box with navieg for an > >>>>antivirus (we are quite unhappy of it) > >>>>We really would like to use a linux based antivirus to check the > >>>>incoming and outgoing mails. > >>>>Our server are unix based systems, but for the moment we do not use any > >>>>antivirus for them, do you think it is mandatory ? > >>>>Finally the cost is for us a big issue as we are a poooooooor compagnie > >>>>(snif sniff ![]() > >>>> > >>>>Any advice/link/ressource you could point me will be greatly appreciate > > > > ! > > > >>>>Thank you very much > >>>> > >>>>Jerome > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 


