Nod32 version 2 observations

Anyone else running Nod32, version 2?
I have since it was released.......any problems? None for me.
I DEFINATELY like they ONE icon in the taskbar, new user interface.
Seems faster than the older one, and I've actually started using the
AMON feature, instead of keeping it off. Seems to suck a little less
resources.

I'd give it a 10 out of 10......but I'm kind of biased toward NOD32

I got no problems with NOD32. I like that IMON feature. I like that IMON can
catch an email that has been infected and allow you to leave it at the pop3
server when pulling it to the OE or Outlook Inbox. I can then use Mailwasher
to whack it at the server or try to clean it before pulling it to the
machine.

Duane
--
The protection of the machine is a process and not a given!

"Duane Arnold" <notme@notme.com> wrote in message
news:0N7Ma.4071$Xm3.938@sccrnsc02...
> I got no problems with NOD32. I like that IMON feature. I like that IMON
can
> catch an email that has been infected and allow you to leave it at the
pop3
> server when pulling it to the OE or Outlook Inbox. I can then use
Mailwasher
> to whack it at the server or try to clean it before pulling it to the
> machine.
>
I'm tryin' to think of an instance in which I'd want mail that was carrying
infected attachments. I can only come up with one in which I requested it
from the sender.

Bjorn Simonsen <bsusenet@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<mg22gvc531siiqbq6sn4lcf4917pvn3v0c@4ax.com>...


> They do not seem to offer downloading cumulative updates from

> their web.

There are problems with cumulative updates. The most serious one is
the size...an incremental update might be 1% of the size of the
cumulative one.

This becomes a problem when a large number of users downloads the
updates at the same time...even if the update servers are have a good
fiber-optic connection they can be overloaded trying to send out
terabytes in a short period of time....tlis leads to delays for the
users. Besides, not all users
have a fast ADSL connection - downloading a 1-2 megabyte file over a
slow modem can be irritating.

Most AV companies either offer incremental updates, or are moving in
that direction - this includes us (F-PROT): Incremental updates will
be the rule in the future.

"RH" <p51d007@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eb02gv4gvv5ggqdbsju2prrehgf9flu39m@4ax.com...
> Anyone else running Nod32, version 2?
> I have since it was released.......any problems? None for me.
> I DEFINATELY like they ONE icon in the taskbar, new user interface.
> Seems faster than the older one, and I've actually started using the
> AMON feature, instead of keeping it off. Seems to suck a little less
> resources.
>
> I'd give it a 10 out of 10......but I'm kind of biased toward NOD32
>


Using it now and I haven't noticed any problems with it.

On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 00:54:26 GMT, "Blevins" <blevins@mchsi.com> wrote:

>
>"RH" <p51d007@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:eb02gv4gvv5ggqdbsju2prrehgf9flu39m@4ax.com...
>> Anyone else running Nod32, version 2?
>> I have since it was released.......any problems? None for me.
>> I DEFINATELY like they ONE icon in the taskbar, new user interface.
>> Seems faster than the older one, and I've actually started using the
>> AMON feature, instead of keeping it off. Seems to suck a little less
>> resources.
>>
>> I'd give it a 10 out of 10......but I'm kind of biased toward NOD32
>>
>
>
>Using it now and I haven't noticed any problems with it.
>

All you who wish to comment, regardless whether you would say the new
NOD32 works or it doesn't, would do much to increase your post's
helpfulness by including your OS & hardware configurations. I might
want to try switching to the newer version but I'm hearing some say it
works while other's say it doesn't. No one seems to be giving me any
idea whether it might work for me or not.

Stever

>All you who wish to comment, regardless whether you would say the new
>NOD32 works or it doesn't, would do much to increase your post's
>helpfulness by including your OS & hardware configurations. I might
>want to try switching to the newer version but I'm hearing some say it
>works while other's say it doesn't. No one seems to be giving me any
>idea whether it might work for me or not.

I upgraded to V2 a couple of days ago. I see no difference in perf and had no
problems. It's definitely more appealing looking, no longer kludgey with all
the various icons and you can schedule scans within NOD32.

XP Home and P4 1.1G/512M

Windows XP, SP1, 1gig ram, P4, 1.8ghz, intel motherboard, 80gig
hard drive, Nvidia GeForce FX5600 ultra, ADSL internet connection.



>
>All you who wish to comment, regardless whether you would say the new
>NOD32 works or it doesn't, would do much to increase your post's
>helpfulness by including your OS & hardware configurations. I might
>want to try switching to the newer version but I'm hearing some say it
>works while other's say it doesn't. No one seems to be giving me any
>idea whether it might work for me or not.
>
>Stever

Sounds like something didn't "take"......any chance you can
roll back, using system restore? Get it stable, double check and
make sure you have no other antivirus software installed/running.
Also, any chance you had Norton, or McAfee at some point before
you installed Nod32? I've seen a lot of horror stories about
NAV/Mcafee not removing itself completely, and then hosing the
computer when you try to install another antivirus software.
After you make sure everything is uninstalled, you might also
try cleaning out the registry. One program I like is called RegScrub
XP. It will remove orphan entries. There are others out there, but
BE CAREFUL when dumping stuff out of the registry. Try downloading
Nod32 again, and try another reinstall......let us know how it goes.
I've e-mailed Eset software, and usually have received a reply within
a few days.



>
>Yeah and I'm having problems (but I LOVED version 1). On my older
>Win98 system using IE6, about half the time that I log off of the
>Internet, that is, I log off of IE I get an Iexplore error message
>that says: This program has preformed an illegal operation and will
>be shut down." Upon looking at the "Details" I see this:
>
>IEXPLORE caused an invalid page fault in
>module KERNEL32.DLL at 016f:bff766bc.
>Registers:
>EAX=049e003c CS=016f EIP=bff766bc EFLGS=00010202
>EBX=00000000 SS=0177 ESP=049e0000 EBP=049e0010
>ECX=00000000 DS=0177 ESI=049e0108 FS=4fa7
>EDX=bff76855 ES=0177 EDI=81b88efc GS=0000
>Bytes at CS:EIP:
>e8 13 ad ff ff 8b 55 08 8f 82 b0 00 00 00 8b 4d
>Stack dump:
>002a0014 00000000 049e003c 049e003c 049e0024 bff766fd 049e003c
>049e01b4 00000000 049e01b4 bff883ed 049e003c bff79060 00000000
>04adffec ffffffff
>
>My system freezes and I can only reboot. Everything worked fine until
>I installed version 2 and this problem then started IMMEDIATELY. I
>have contacted tech support, no answer yet.
>
>
>Please reply in this forum since above email address is no longer
>valid, thank you. Take care and have a happy life.

Win 2k Pro and ADV Server machines

Duane
--
The protection of the machine is a process and not a given!

"Stephen D. Salmon" <sdsalmon@fromcast.net> wrote in message
newsa5sgvkq9qsbvestjs4ijgqnila2ochs6p@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 00:54:26 GMT, "Blevins" <blevins@mchsi.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"RH" <p51d007@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:eb02gv4gvv5ggqdbsju2prrehgf9flu39m@4ax.com...
> >> Anyone else running Nod32, version 2?
> >> I have since it was released.......any problems? None for me.
> >> I DEFINATELY like they ONE icon in the taskbar, new user interface.
> >> Seems faster than the older one, and I've actually started using the
> >> AMON feature, instead of keeping it off. Seems to suck a little less
> >> resources.
> >>
> >> I'd give it a 10 out of 10......but I'm kind of biased toward NOD32
> >>
> >
> >
> >Using it now and I haven't noticed any problems with it.
> >
>
> All you who wish to comment, regardless whether you would say the new
> NOD32 works or it doesn't, would do much to increase your post's
> helpfulness by including your OS & hardware configurations. I might
> want to try switching to the newer version but I'm hearing some say it
> works while other's say it doesn't. No one seems to be giving me any
> idea whether it might work for me or not.
>
> Stever