test

test

"zlatko" <kreat@hi.htnet.hr> wrote in message
news:crmkvk$k6t$1@ls219.htnet.hr...
> test

10/10

Frank Bohan
¶ Work expands to fill the time available for its completion.

>On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:38:44 +0100, "zlatko" <kreat@hi.htnet.hr> wrote:
>
>test
>
I'll bet that in your wildest imagination you newer thought that you
should use alt.test for a test post instead of posting here.

On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 02:16:59 GMT, RE: Re: test Mel <MJ@nospam.com>
wrote:

>>On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:38:44 +0100, "zlatko" <kreat@hi.htnet.hr> wrote:
>>
>>test
>>
>I'll bet that in your wildest imagination you newer thought that you
>should use alt.test for a test post instead of posting here.

Have you ever posted to a particular NG and not have your posts show
up, even though you can see your posts to *other* NGs show up? What do
you do then? Post to alt.test? What would that tell you?

--
See the A.C.F alternative FAQ at http://stalkingsheep.co.uk/antifaq.htm
In an unmoderated NG you can control what you read and what you write.
That's all you can control.

>>>On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:38:44 +0100, "zlatko" <kreat@hi.htnet.hr> wrote:
>>>
>>>test
>>>
>>I'll bet that in your wildest imagination you newer thought that you
>>should use alt.test for a test post instead of posting here.
>>
>On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 08:47:08 -0600, Vic Dura <vpdura@XXXhiwaay.net> wrote:
>
>Have you ever posted to a particular NG and not have your posts show
>up, even though you can see your posts to *other* NGs show up?
>
On occasion.
>
>What do you do then?
>
Try again later.
>
>Post to alt.test?
>
Yes, if the problem continues.
>
>What would that tell you?
>
Which end the problem is at.

The OP doesn't seem to grasp the simple concept that posting off-topic
posts in a news group with a specific topic (freeware) is not
acceptable, especially when an appropriate news group is available for
said post.

Anyone who explores a topic marked "test" and takes the time to
complain about its existence clearly does not have enough to do.

Anne

On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:42:00 GMT, Mel <MJ@nospam.com> wrote:

>>>>On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:38:44 +0100, "zlatko" <kreat@hi.htnet.hr> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>test
>>>>
>>>I'll bet that in your wildest imagination you newer thought that you
>>>should use alt.test for a test post instead of posting here.
>>>
>>On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 08:47:08 -0600, Vic Dura <vpdura@XXXhiwaay.net> wrote:
>>
>>Have you ever posted to a particular NG and not have your posts show
>>up, even though you can see your posts to *other* NGs show up?
>>
>On occasion.
>>
>>What do you do then?
>>
>Try again later.
>>
>>Post to alt.test?
>>
>Yes, if the problem continues.
>>
>>What would that tell you?
>>
>Which end the problem is at.
>
>The OP doesn't seem to grasp the simple concept that posting off-topic
>posts in a news group with a specific topic (freeware) is not
>acceptable, especially when an appropriate news group is available for
>said post.

"Vic Dura" <vpdura@XXXhiwaay.net> wrote in message
news:5rovt0h8m3skbdc4efegg862g024ukm6t2@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 02:16:59 GMT, RE: Re: test Mel <MJ@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
>>>On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:38:44 +0100, "zlatko" <kreat@hi.htnet.hr> wrote:
>>>
>>>test
>>>
>>I'll bet that in your wildest imagination you newer thought that you
>>should use alt.test for a test post instead of posting here.
>
> Have you ever posted to a particular NG and not have your posts show
> up, even though you can see your posts to *other* NGs show up? What do
> you do then? Post to alt.test? What would that tell you?
>

I occasionally find that posts do not show up. I check to see if it has
appeared on Google Groups and/or Netscan. If it has not I re-post with
"Re-post" added to the subject.

===

Frank Bohan
¶ ZZZ.zzz is a soporific program.

>On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:47:16 -0500, Anne Carle <acarle@munge.com> wrote:
>
>Anyone who explores a topic marked "test" and takes the time to
>complain about its existence clearly does not have enough to do.
>
>Anne
>
Thanks for the confession.