PC Review Forums Newsgroups Hardware ATI Video Cards Anyone here use SciTech GLDirect ???

Reply

Anyone here use SciTech GLDirect ???

 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 25-06-2003, 06:41 AM   #1
samualt@here.not
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Anyone here use SciTech GLDirect ???


Anyone here use SciTech GLDirect ???

I am trying to use it, but In GLDirect under "Stereo Device" and "Configuration
Notes" it says:

"No SciTech Nucleus Graphics driver could be loaded for the installed graphics
board's chipset. Only stereo modes which do not require refresh rate support are
available with this generic graphics configuration."

It didn't matter if I had it set to Primary or Secondary adapter
for the ATI Radeon 9700. I assume this really means that the
ATI Radeon 9700 is not supported at all by SciTech's GLDirect.
Is that true?

Thanks for any info..............

ATI Radeon 9700, newest directx, newest gldirect.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2003, 07:01 PM   #2
chuck
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Anyone here use SciTech GLDirect ???


<samualt@here.not> wrote in message
news:dp9ifvoh94g6otjtjgdc6639vkdq5doo0e@4ax.com...
> Anyone here use SciTech GLDirect ???
>
> I am trying to use it, but In GLDirect under "Stereo Device" and

"Configuration
> Notes" it says:
>
> "No SciTech Nucleus Graphics driver could be loaded for the installed

graphics
> board's chipset. Only stereo modes which do not require refresh rate

support are
> available with this generic graphics configuration."
>
> It didn't matter if I had it set to Primary or Secondary adapter
> for the ATI Radeon 9700. I assume this really means that the
> ATI Radeon 9700 is not supported at all by SciTech's GLDirect.
> Is that true?
>
> Thanks for any info..............
>
> ATI Radeon 9700, newest directx, newest gldirect.


"Stereo Device" refers to those 3D visors that you see advertised for real
3d gameplay. the software somehow sends slightly different images to each
screen of the visor to make a 3D picture. I've tried GLDirect but it slowed
down the response too much and the graphics looked terrible, shadowing was
wrong, etc. Shouldn't have been since i'm using an Athlon XP 2000+, and
Radeon 9000 Pro.


  Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off