PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
ATI Video Cards
Re: 3.5 drivers?
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
ATI Video Cards
Re: 3.5 drivers?
![]() |
Re: 3.5 drivers? |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It's up
"boe" <boe_d@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:qtEJa.347$nG.683@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net... > Are they still scheduled for release today? > > |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Weird. The file size listed on the download page is "16 MB" but my download
was only 6.5 MB. Ken "boe" <boe_d@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:d7GJa.605$e26.21@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net... > It's up > "boe" <boe_d@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:qtEJa.347$nG.683@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net... > > Are they still scheduled for release today? > > > > > > |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You can see the Catalyst version by going to: Display Properties, Advanced,
Options. Ken "boe" <boe_d@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:8HGJa.1028201$OV.1124352@rwcrnsc54... > I don't know of an easy way to tell if they installed over the old drivers. > When I go to display properties, advanced, adapter, driver info it tells me > I have Drivers version 6.14.10.6360 - why doesn't it have a 3.4 or 3.5 to > let me know what driver version I have? > > "boe" <boe_d@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:d7GJa.605$e26.21@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net... > > It's up > > "boe" <boe_d@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:qtEJa.347$nG.683@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net... > > > Are they still scheduled for release today? > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I don't know of an easy way to tell if they installed over the old drivers.
When I go to display properties, advanced, adapter, driver info it tells me I have Drivers version 6.14.10.6360 - why doesn't it have a 3.4 or 3.5 to let me know what driver version I have? "boe" <boe_d@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:d7GJa.605$e26.21@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net... > It's up > "boe" <boe_d@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:qtEJa.347$nG.683@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net... > > Are they still scheduled for release today? > > > > > > |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
lol
it is 3.5 On top it should say CATALYST VERSION hth -- Splitskull "boe" <boe_d@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:8HGJa.1028201$OV.1124352@rwcrnsc54... > I don't know of an easy way to tell if they installed over the old drivers. > When I go to display properties, advanced, adapter, driver info it tells me > I have Drivers version 6.14.10.6360 - why doesn't it have a 3.4 or 3.5 to > let me know what driver version I have? > > "boe" <boe_d@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:d7GJa.605$e26.21@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net... > > It's up > > "boe" <boe_d@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:qtEJa.347$nG.683@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net... > > > Are they still scheduled for release today? > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Oh - I see it under OPTIONS. I thought it would have that under the drivers
info. Thanks "Splitskull" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message news:5PGJa.20774$PD3.72054@nnrp1.uunet.ca... > lol > it is 3.5 > On top it should say CATALYST VERSION > hth > -- > > Splitskull > > "boe" <boe_d@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:8HGJa.1028201$OV.1124352@rwcrnsc54... > > I don't know of an easy way to tell if they installed over the old > drivers. > > When I go to display properties, advanced, adapter, driver info it tells > me > > I have Drivers version 6.14.10.6360 - why doesn't it have a 3.4 or 3.5 to > > let me know what driver version I have? > > > > "boe" <boe_d@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:d7GJa.605$e26.21@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net... > > > It's up > > > "boe" <boe_d@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > news:qtEJa.347$nG.683@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net... > > > > Are they still scheduled for release today? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Usenetter" <me_again_@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:bd7tsc$kkj$1@titan.btinternet.com... > I just installed 3.5 - what a sackapoopoo ! > OK, it raised my 3DMk01 score by 200 pts - but I had to drop 1 MHZ FSB to > regain joystick control in CFS3. ..... but mainly, made it horribly jerky. > Needless to say, it's been rolled back - and a veil drawn over the sordid > affair. > Or did I miss something ? > Tell me I did. > > UN > ---------- > > Epox 8RDA3+ (225 FSB) > XP1700 DUT3C 0312xx (9.5 = 2134 MHz [XP2700+] stable) > 2 x 256MB OCZ PC3700 EL (450 - 6-3-3 / 2.0 - dual mode) > Gigabyte Radeon 9700 Pro > Air - 45/63C > 3DMk03 - 5,098 > 3DMk01 - 16,126 > > > > "Splitskull" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message > news:5PGJa.20774$PD3.72054@nnrp1.uunet.ca... > > lol > > it is 3.5 > > On top it should say CATALYST VERSION > > hth > > -- > > > > Splitskull > > > > "boe" <boe_d@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:8HGJa.1028201$OV.1124352@rwcrnsc54... > > > I don't know of an easy way to tell if they installed over the old > > drivers. > > > When I go to display properties, advanced, adapter, driver info it tells > > me > > > I have Drivers version 6.14.10.6360 - why doesn't it have a 3.4 or 3.5 > to > > > let me know what driver version I have? > > > > > > "boe" <boe_d@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > news:d7GJa.605$e26.21@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net... > > > > It's up > > > > "boe" <boe_d@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > > news:qtEJa.347$nG.683@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net... > > > > > Are they still scheduled for release today? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 22:10:20 +0000 (UTC), "Usenetter"
<me_again_@btinternet.com> wrote: >OK, it raised my 3DMk01 score by 200 pts - but I had to drop 1 MHZ FSB to >regain joystick control in CFS3. ROFL! Poor baby - you had to slow down your overclocking. >Or did I miss something ? Perhaps the drivers push the hardware a wee bit harder? Who knows... Basically whenever I see an overclocker coming to grief (read: pushing the hardware to borderline beyond spec) I snicker. They're rock solid on my 2000+. -- Roj "To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield." - Ulysses |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:02:28 +0000 (UTC), "Usenetter"
<me_again_@btinternet.com> wrote: >I'm sure they'd be rock solid on my 2700 (really a 1700) at default speeds, >too - but that just ain't the point. Sure it is. >They're not up to the jobby - and I object. They're very much on the job - they developed a product that runs at spec. YOU decided to push it past spec. Once you did that, you're on your own - in short, it's your ass Cochise. You want faster? Here's a novel concept: BUY faster. The hardware is dirt cheap these days. Don't B&C about a self-inflicted wound. -- Roj "To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield." - Ulysses |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 20:22:12 +0000 (UTC), "Usenetter"
<me_again_@btinternet.com> wrote: >Sure, on some tortoise rig. Hey speed demon, *I'M* not the one doing de-railing. <chuckle> >The 3.4 driver is superior (for my requirements). Fair ball. >Why buy a Ferrari and put a brick under the throttle ? Why soup up a lawnmower to run like a Ninja? >Yes, but so am I. *THAT* I can respect - however I don't try and bend the rules in the process. To each his own - just don't blame a company for your own bending of the rules. -- Roj "To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield." - Ulysses |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

