Re: Is a Celeron 600Mhz is on a par with a Pentium 150Mhz ??

Have you ever used a Celeron 1.7? Your assumptions are false for the most part. My Game machine is a Cely 1.7 and it works
beautifully. Along with a TI4200, 1GB of ram, a 7200 RPM drive, it plays any game out there with no problems using 1024x768 @ 32 bit
color.

--


----------------------------------------------------------------
you can see why I dont pay much attention to "JK" <JK9821@netscape.net> wrote in message news:3EF4C8CB.9861B208@netscape.net...
>

>
> The Celeron 600 is based on the P3. P3 based Celerons perform much
> better on a clock speed basis than P4 based Celerons, except in a few
> highly optimized SSE2 applications. For most software, a Celeron 1.4 ghz,
> would probably beat a 1.7 ghz Celeron by a large margin.
>

>
> The Celeron 1.4 ghz is interesting, although since it is around the price of
> an Athlon XP1700+, I would much rather have the XP1700+. The P4 based
> Celerons imo look like very bad values. The clock speeds might be high,
> however the performance is much lower than similarly priced Athlon XP
> chips in most applications.
>
> >
> >
> > Cheers I^)
>

David B. wrote:
> Have you ever used a Celeron 1.7? Your assumptions are false for the most part. My Game machine is a Cely 1.7 and it works
> beautifully. Along with a TI4200, 1GB of ram, a 7200 RPM drive, it plays any game out there with no problems using 1024x768 @ 32 bit
> color.
>


Google for the comparisons of the Cel1.4 and cel1.7

--

Are you registered as a bone marrow donor? You regenerate what you
donate. You are offered the chance to donate only if you match a person
on the recipient list. Call your local Red Cross and ask about
registering to be a bone marrow donor.

spam trap: replace shyah_right with hotmail when replying