PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Scanners
which film / & film or digital
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Scanners
which film / & film or digital
![]() |
which film / & film or digital |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Untruth,
I have access to a D100 and though it's a fine camera, I never consider anything but film for serious shooting. To me it just feels different, both in shooting and in the results (I love my film cameras too!). I also switch back and forth from CN to CS films, depending on my mood, I guess. I enjoy working with both. Usually I use one or the other, but not both on the same assignment or job. My favorite slide films are reala 100 and an occasional ektachrome. Provia and Velvia are ok, but a little contrasty for me. For CN films, I like Portra 100 and Agfa UC100. I'm sure there are others just as good or better that I haven't tried. It's to a large degree a matter of preference. I also use B&W films, but not as much as I used to. Usually end up using Tri-x or HP5. Sometimes these are easy to scan (CN mode), and other times they're tough. My scanner is a Coolscan V. Slides are sometimes more fun to scan, just because there's something to compare both before and after. They do seem tougher than color negatives though. Color negatives usually scan with much less fuss and they give beautiful results. The only problem I have with color negative film is depth of field across the scanned frame. I usually scan using Vuescan, but sometimes I start out with Nikon Scan and end up rolling along with that until something isn't coming out quite right. It's good to have options. Hope this helps. BTW, Someone mentioned overexposing CN film -- I used to do this before digital and would usually get finer grain from the 400 films. If the negative is too dense, though, the scanner may have a hard time focusing on it. Dan |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

