PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Scanners
VueScan and FUJIcolor film
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Scanners
VueScan and FUJIcolor film
![]() |
VueScan and FUJIcolor film |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have been using Fujicolor SUPERIA ISO 200. It's a great film. I also use
VueScan to scan the negatives. Version 8.0.14 of VueScan does provide settings for FUJI film within the color tab but the choices are unclear to me for the "Negative brand". The choices are: NHG, GPS, Super G, Super HG, and Super HR. I find nothing that I recognize as SUPERIA 200. Which one should I use? I also have Monaco EZcolor and an IT8 color slide. I suppose I could make an icc profile but the only IT8 slide I have been able to find is for Kodak Ektachrome. I don't think I can use this to calibrate my Nikon LS-2000 film scanner, when I'm using Fujicolor, can I?!? This color matching stuff is not for the faint of heart. Thank you for any direction you can give me. Dave |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"David DeBar" <porkdebarparts@comcast.net> wrote in message news:wdqdnT6bae8QWaXcRVn-hA@comcast.com... > I have been using Fujicolor SUPERIA ISO 200. It's a great film. I also use > VueScan to scan the negatives. > Version 8.0.14 of VueScan does provide settings for FUJI film within the > color tab but the choices are unclear to me for the "Negative brand". > The choices are: NHG, GPS, Super G, Super HG, and Super HR. I find nothing > that I recognize as SUPERIA 200. Which one should I use? > > I also have Monaco EZcolor and an IT8 color slide. I suppose I could make > an icc profile but the only IT8 slide I have been able to find is for Kodak > Ektachrome. I don't think I can use this to calibrate my Nikon LS-2000 film > scanner, when I'm using Fujicolor, can I?!? No, you should not use a profile for E6 film to interpret scans of C41 film. Jim |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <q34_c.16668$iM6.805@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com>,
"Jim" <j.n@nospam.com> wrote: > No, you should not use a profile for E6 film to interpret scans of C41 film. But note that VueScan can generate both scanner profiles and film profiles. Obviously, an IT8 target on an E6 slide should not be used to generate a film profile that will be used to characterize C41 film. But what if the E6 slide is used to generate a scanner profile (which characterizes the scanner's response to colors)? Granted, the scanner's response to E6 and C41 dyes may be different. But might that scanner profile be better than using no profile at all? -- Julian Vrieslander |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Julian,
Great minds think alike. That was my line of thinking, but I'm not sure of the answer. Another thought: What would happen if I used my camera loaded with Fuijicolor and took a picture of an IT8 target. I have a printed IT8 target for use on flat bed scanners, and I do have optical equipment that will let me photograph the slide. Using a flash as the light source might control color errors. I don't know if this would work. Just a happy thought...... Dave "Julian Vrieslander" <julianvREMOVE_THIS_PART@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:julianvREMOVE_THIS_PART-57F94E.14423303092004@gnus01.u.washington.edu.. .. > In article <q34_c.16668$iM6.805@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com>, > "Jim" <j.n@nospam.com> wrote: > > > No, you should not use a profile for E6 film to interpret scans of C41 film. > > But note that VueScan can generate both scanner profiles and film > profiles. Obviously, an IT8 target on an E6 slide should not be used to > generate a film profile that will be used to characterize C41 film. But > what if the E6 slide is used to generate a scanner profile (which > characterizes the scanner's response to colors)? Granted, the scanner's > response to E6 and C41 dyes may be different. But might that scanner > profile be better than using no profile at all? > > -- > Julian Vrieslander |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Julian Vrieslander" <julianvREMOVE_THIS_PART@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:julianvREMOVE_THIS_PART-57F94E.14423303092004@gnus01.u.washington.edu... > In article <q34_c.16668$iM6.805@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com>, > "Jim" <j.n@nospam.com> wrote: > > > No, you should not use a profile for E6 film to interpret scans of C41 film. > > But note that VueScan can generate both scanner profiles and film > profiles. Obviously, an IT8 target on an E6 slide should not be used to > generate a film profile that will be used to characterize C41 film. But > what if the E6 slide is used to generate a scanner profile (which > characterizes the scanner's response to colors)? Granted, the scanner's > response to E6 and C41 dyes may be different. But might that scanner > profile be better than using no profile at all? No. Vuescan already has C41 profiles. All you need to do is decide which one to use; I suspect that there really isn't much difference between them. Jim |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If you're going to get into any camerabased profiling – analog or
digital – get a traditional MacBeth patch target which is reacting very equal in different colorspectras. Also, it's larger than a little IT8. It can be used in most external profiling softwares too, in this regard. This simple traditional target has shown more pay off than any more advanced newer target. That said, don't expect to much success. The variables involved are endless. Good luck. nikita |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <34l_c.16851$5G4.14982@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com>,
"Jim" <j.n@nospam.com> wrote: > "Julian Vrieslander" <julianvREMOVE_THIS_PART@mindspring.com> wrote in > message > news:julianvREMOVE_THIS_PART-57F94E.14423303092004@gnus01.u.washington.edu... > > In article <q34_c.16668$iM6.805@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com>, > > "Jim" <j.n@nospam.com> wrote: > > > > > No, you should not use a profile for E6 film to interpret scans of C41 > film. > > > > But note that VueScan can generate both scanner profiles and film > > profiles. Obviously, an IT8 target on an E6 slide should not be used to > > generate a film profile that will be used to characterize C41 film. But > > what if the E6 slide is used to generate a scanner profile (which > > characterizes the scanner's response to colors)? Granted, the scanner's > > response to E6 and C41 dyes may be different. But might that scanner > > profile be better than using no profile at all? > No. Vuescan already has C41 profiles. All you need to do is decide which > one to use; I suspect that there really isn't much difference between them. > Jim Yes, VS has internal C41 profiles - but are those film profiles or scanner profiles? I suspect they are the former. I was writing about the latter. -- Julian Vrieslander |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Julian,
You have hit on the crux of the problem that is confusing me. Under the color tab in VS I choose: Negative Vendor: FUJI Negative brand: Super HG Negative Type: 200 I chose these settings because they seem to most closely describe the (Fujicolor Superia ISO 200) film that I like to use. Under the input tab in VS I have specified my Source: LS-2000 (Nikon film scanner) I assume that VS is smart enough to put this information together and come up with a profile for COMBINATION of these parameters. What still bothers me is that my scanner is several years old. The lamp must be aging and the colors shifting. I must admit that the colors look pretty darn good to me, with the above settings. Most of the time I make some color adjustments from within PS to make the colors on my screen match what I remember the colors really looked like to me when I took the picture. Dave > > Yes, VS has internal C41 profiles - but are those film profiles or > scanner profiles? I suspect they are the former. I was writing about > the latter. > > -- > Julian Vrieslander |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"David DeBar" <porkdebarparts@comcast.net> wrote in message news:W8idne4CRpE8PKHcRVn-tg@comcast.com... SNIP > Under the input tab in VS I have specified my Source: LS-2000 (Nikon film > scanner) > > I assume that VS is smart enough to put this information together and come > up with a profile for COMBINATION of these parameters. > > What still bothers me is that my scanner is several years old. The lamp > must be aging and the colors shifting. There is no lamp in that model (likewise in the other 'Cool'scans), they use LEDs to trans-illuminate the film. Their characteristics don't change much during their lifetime. However, mirrors and optics can collect dust over the years (build-up depends on the environment the scanner is used in). Bart |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Im Posting von David DeBar <porkdebarparts@comcast.net> stand:
> I have been using Fujicolor SUPERIA ISO 200. It's a great film. I also use > VueScan to scan the negatives. > Version 8.0.14 of VueScan does provide settings for FUJI film within the > color tab but the choices are unclear to me for the "Negative brand". > The choices are: NHG, GPS, Super G, Super HG, and Super HR. I find nothing > that I recognize as SUPERIA 200. Which one should I use? None. Use Generic Color Negative and Advanced workflow (see manual). The latter will compensate for the orange mask. If your'e still not happy with the colors, shoot a grey card together with a piece of white paper. Use color balance manual to preview this image and do a right click on the paper to adjust neutral color. Look at the RGB values for the grey card. If they are not more or less equal, adjust Brightness Red and Brightness Blue until the R and B value equals the G value. To equalize grain for measurement you can use Grain Reduction Heavy temporarily. Note down the Neutral color and the brightness values for future use. These values give a better "profile" than a vuescan generated ICC from an IT8 target. -- Erik Krause Digital contrast problems: http://www.erik-krause.de/contrast |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

