PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Scanners
scanning dpi
Forums
Newsgroups
Hardware
Scanners
scanning dpi
![]() |
scanning dpi |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is there an article I can read about the best dpi for scanning photos and
35mm negatives? I'm looking for the optimal dpi for canning pictures and negatives without saving multi-MB files. There is a point where too much dpi is wasted when printing a 4x6 or 5x7 to a local standard photo printer. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Charlie Klatzkin" <klatzkin@dsg-inc.com> wrote in message news:0MudnaLwD5ZaG6XcRVn-gw@comcast.com... > Is there an article I can read about the best dpi for scanning photos and > 35mm negatives? I'm looking for the optimal dpi for canning pictures and > negatives without saving multi-MB files. There is a point where too much > dpi is wasted when printing a 4x6 or 5x7 to a local standard photo printer. www.scantips.com If a printer (e.g. Fuji Frontier) uses 300ppi data, then you need to supply 1200x1800 pixels for a 4x6in, and 1500x2100 pixels for a 5x7in print. Other pixel sizes will be resized (resampled) by the printer, which may or may not deteriorate the image quality. If you want to be sure, just give them what they need. The quality of those pixels can be increased if you scan more of them (at least 2x in each dimension), and then down-sample to the required pixel size. After down-sampling, you should apply some sharpening to compensate for fine detail contrast losses due to the scanning, resampling, and printing processes. So, in your case, if you never intend to print larger than 5x7in, and you want the better quality, I would scan a file of at least 3000x4500 pixels (it will even allow to print a decent 8x10in). You can then downsample and crop that file to the pixel size needed for the final output. Do note that the aspect ratio of 5x7 is more square than 4x6, so I took the longest dimensions to accomodate both. Bart |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Before simply scanning for optimal printer resolution at a specific smaller
scan size you really need to consider what else you might want to do with the image at a later time. In reality it is easier to scan the image the first time at a size that is more optimal for manipulation, retouching and possibly printing at a larger size then to redo it later when the original negative or transparency might have been lost or damaged. CD and DVD storage is dirt cheap compared to the loss of a valued picture. For 35mm originals for most people a scan of 2000-2400 dpi, yielding a file size of 20-24mbs, is the most practical. This allows for significant cropping with enough pixels left over for a quality image, especially if you print no larger that 5x7. An image of this size will easily scale up to 11 x 14, and actually larger, if ever desired. |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

