PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft Outlook
Microsoft Outlook Program Addins
Disabling "send immediately when connected" programmatically
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft Outlook
Microsoft Outlook Program Addins
Disabling "send immediately when connected" programmatically
![]() |
Disabling "send immediately when connected" programmatically |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Not positive if this will work, but it's a different
direction to the one your trying, maybe a modified version would help, but here's my idea: If I'm not mistaken the inspector will remain open while sending, then dies once the message is sent, no matter what the size of message or its attachments. So implement either a "WithEvents" or "AddHandler" for the inspector's _Close event then test to make sure it's the last man off the boat: ('golapp' being the global outlook variable) If golApp.ActiveExplorer Is Nothing And golApp.Inspectors.Count <= 0 Then GoTo ExitAddin ' Do the close here End If If an explorer is also spawning you'll need to capture its _Close event, too. >-----Original Message----- >Via the Outlook Object Model, I have an application that can display an >Outlook 2002 MailItem Inspector by calling the Display (false) method on a >new MailItem object. This will generate a non-modal inspector. > >The Outlook 2002 application itself is not running, just the Application >object. > >If Outlook 2002 is configured in Send/Receive to "Send immediately when >connected", and you send an e-mail with a large attachment, and then >shutdown the application, you may get an Outlook 2002 error "the task was >cancelled before it was completed". > >Obviously, one cannot shutdown the OOM application object prior to the >Outlook spooler doing its job. > >One possible workaround is to force the MailItem not to be spooled in the >first place. > >Is there a hidden or undocumented MAPI property or hack where I can mark a >MailItem as "do not send immediately"? > >Yes, I can generate a modal Inspector, but I don't want to do that. I would >rather that mail pile up in the Outbox then abort the spooler half way >through a task. > > >. > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

