PC Review Forums Newsgroups Windows XP Windows XP Security Failure Audits in XP Events Security log

Reply

Failure Audits in XP Events Security log

 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 07-02-2005, 04:42 AM   #1
Gary Karasik
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Failure Audits in XP Events Security log


Hi,

I hope this is the correct place to post this:

I have several clients with SBS2003 networks consisting of XP/SP1 clients.
All of the XP clients are showing lots of Failure Audits in the Security
Event logs. They are all similar to the following, although some specify
LSASS, some SPOOLSV, some SVCHOST. EventID.NET suggests turning off the
Firewall Service, but turning the Firewall Service off causes the Computer
Browser Service to shut down, so that's not a happy option.

I tried adding LSASS and SPOOLSV to the Exception list, but that didn't stop
the failure audits.

Can anyone tell me hot to fix this?

GaryK

---------------------------------------------------------
Event Type: Failure Audit
Event Source: Security
Event Category: Detailed Tracking
Event ID: 861
Date: 2/2/2005
Time: 8:46:17 PM
User: NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM
Computer: JOSHUA
Description:
The Windows Firewall has detected an application listening for incoming
traffic.
Name: -
Path: C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\lsass.exe
Process identifier: 688
User account: SYSTEM
User domain: NT AUTHORITY
Service: Yes
RPC server: No
IP version: IPv4
IP protocol: UDP
Port number: 3794
Allowed: No
User notified: No



  Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2005, 10:50 AM   #2
JW
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Failure Audits in XP Events Security log

Gary Karasik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope this is the correct place to post this:
>
> I have several clients with SBS2003 networks consisting of XP/SP1 clients.
> All of the XP clients are showing lots of Failure Audits in the Security
> Event logs. They are all similar to the following, although some specify
> LSASS, some SPOOLSV, some SVCHOST. EventID.NET suggests turning off the
> Firewall Service, but turning the Firewall Service off causes the Computer
> Browser Service to shut down, so that's not a happy option.
>
> I tried adding LSASS and SPOOLSV to the Exception list, but that didn't stop
> the failure audits.
>
> Can anyone tell me hot to fix this?
>
> GaryK
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Event Type: Failure Audit
> Event Source: Security
> Event Category: Detailed Tracking
> Event ID: 861
> Date: 2/2/2005
> Time: 8:46:17 PM
> User: NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM
> Computer: JOSHUA
> Description:
> The Windows Firewall has detected an application listening for incoming
> traffic.
> Name: -
> Path: C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\lsass.exe
> Process identifier: 688
> User account: SYSTEM
> User domain: NT AUTHORITY
> Service: Yes
> RPC server: No
> IP version: IPv4
> IP protocol: UDP
> Port number: 3794
> Allowed: No
> User notified: No
>
>
>

for those PCs behind a hardware gateway/NAT/firewall, the XP software
firewall would normally not be needed, but i don't know what the
Computer Browser Service is for.

for other users, i would recommend turning off auditing of the category
named "Detailed Tracking". my event log was also drowning in thousands
of these lines, and i am a user of a single, non-network PC. the only
alternative, which has dangerous consequences, is to allow all those
applications to listen and respond to all incoming network traffic.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2005, 03:50 PM   #3
Gary Karasik
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Failure Audits in XP Events Security log

Thanks, JW,

Responses in line:

> for those PCs behind a hardware gateway/NAT/firewall, the XP software
> firewall would normally not be needed, but i don't know what the Computer
> Browser Service is for.


On a network, the Computer Browser service allows computers to see and work
with each other. Some people advocate using the firewall internally in case
a PC behind the firewall somehow gets infected. The theory is that the
firewall would help protect PCs inside the network from each other.

> for other users, i would recommend turning off auditing of the category
> named "Detailed Tracking". my event log was also drowning in thousands of
> these lines, and i am a user of a single, non-network PC. the only
> alternative, which has dangerous consequences, is to allow all those
> applications to listen and respond to all incoming network traffic.


Yes, I could turn off auditing, but I want to understand why I'm getting
these failure audits.

GaryK


  Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off