PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows XP
Windows XP Security
Failure Audits in XP Events Security log
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows XP
Windows XP Security
Failure Audits in XP Events Security log
![]() |
Failure Audits in XP Events Security log |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I hope this is the correct place to post this: I have several clients with SBS2003 networks consisting of XP/SP1 clients. All of the XP clients are showing lots of Failure Audits in the Security Event logs. They are all similar to the following, although some specify LSASS, some SPOOLSV, some SVCHOST. EventID.NET suggests turning off the Firewall Service, but turning the Firewall Service off causes the Computer Browser Service to shut down, so that's not a happy option. I tried adding LSASS and SPOOLSV to the Exception list, but that didn't stop the failure audits. Can anyone tell me hot to fix this? GaryK --------------------------------------------------------- Event Type: Failure Audit Event Source: Security Event Category: Detailed Tracking Event ID: 861 Date: 2/2/2005 Time: 8:46:17 PM User: NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM Computer: JOSHUA Description: The Windows Firewall has detected an application listening for incoming traffic. Name: - Path: C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\lsass.exe Process identifier: 688 User account: SYSTEM User domain: NT AUTHORITY Service: Yes RPC server: No IP version: IPv4 IP protocol: UDP Port number: 3794 Allowed: No User notified: No |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Gary Karasik wrote:
> Hi, > > I hope this is the correct place to post this: > > I have several clients with SBS2003 networks consisting of XP/SP1 clients. > All of the XP clients are showing lots of Failure Audits in the Security > Event logs. They are all similar to the following, although some specify > LSASS, some SPOOLSV, some SVCHOST. EventID.NET suggests turning off the > Firewall Service, but turning the Firewall Service off causes the Computer > Browser Service to shut down, so that's not a happy option. > > I tried adding LSASS and SPOOLSV to the Exception list, but that didn't stop > the failure audits. > > Can anyone tell me hot to fix this? > > GaryK > > --------------------------------------------------------- > Event Type: Failure Audit > Event Source: Security > Event Category: Detailed Tracking > Event ID: 861 > Date: 2/2/2005 > Time: 8:46:17 PM > User: NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM > Computer: JOSHUA > Description: > The Windows Firewall has detected an application listening for incoming > traffic. > Name: - > Path: C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\lsass.exe > Process identifier: 688 > User account: SYSTEM > User domain: NT AUTHORITY > Service: Yes > RPC server: No > IP version: IPv4 > IP protocol: UDP > Port number: 3794 > Allowed: No > User notified: No > > > for those PCs behind a hardware gateway/NAT/firewall, the XP software firewall would normally not be needed, but i don't know what the Computer Browser Service is for. for other users, i would recommend turning off auditing of the category named "Detailed Tracking". my event log was also drowning in thousands of these lines, and i am a user of a single, non-network PC. the only alternative, which has dangerous consequences, is to allow all those applications to listen and respond to all incoming network traffic. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks, JW,
Responses in line: > for those PCs behind a hardware gateway/NAT/firewall, the XP software > firewall would normally not be needed, but i don't know what the Computer > Browser Service is for. On a network, the Computer Browser service allows computers to see and work with each other. Some people advocate using the firewall internally in case a PC behind the firewall somehow gets infected. The theory is that the firewall would help protect PCs inside the network from each other. > for other users, i would recommend turning off auditing of the category > named "Detailed Tracking". my event log was also drowning in thousands of > these lines, and i am a user of a single, non-network PC. the only > alternative, which has dangerous consequences, is to allow all those > applications to listen and respond to all incoming network traffic. Yes, I could turn off auditing, but I want to understand why I'm getting these failure audits. GaryK |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

