PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft Excel
Microsoft Excel Charting
Regression analysis excel 2002
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft Excel
Microsoft Excel Charting
Regression analysis excel 2002
![]() |
Regression analysis excel 2002 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The statistical tools in Excel are not reliable.
Use a statistical package such as S-Plus or do the calculations by hand if they are relatively small. Josie >-----Original Message----- >Can anybody explain why I get different values for regression analysis using >the data analysis under "tools" and when the add trendline is used. Note >the intercept is not set to zero. > > A B > 2 3 > 3 4 > 5 7 > 7 11 > 9 13 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SUMMARY OUTPUT > > Regression Statistics > Multiple R 0.994674781 > R Square 0.989377919 > Adjusted R Square 0.985837225 > Standard Error 0.516004034 > Observations 5 > > ANOVA > df SS MS F Significance F > Regression 1 74.40122 74.40122 279.4305 0.000466115 > Residual 3 0.79878 0.26626 > Total 4 75.2 > > Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower >95.0% Upper 95.0% > Intercept -0.231707317 0.522259 -0.44366 0.687333 - 1.893769644 >1.430355 -1.89377 1.430355 > A 1.506097561 0.090098 16.71618 0.000466 1.219364569 1.792831 1.219365 >1.792831 > > > |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
When properly used (see posts by Mike Middleton and Jon Peltier) Excel's
polynomial trendline fit is more accurate than lm() in S-Plus (unless you explicitly do a poly.transform of an orthogonal polynomial fit) and most other dedicated statistics packages. Excel's statistical fitting functions are mathematically exact, but implemented in a way that does not minimize rounding errors with challenging data sets (the OP's data set is not challenging). For univariate and bivariate statistics, there are easy workarounds to handle even challenging data http://groups.google.com/groups?sel...%40mediaone.net Alternately, Excel 2003 uses much improved algorithms. Excel does not and probably never will have the statistical power and flexibility of a dedicated statistics package, but that does not mean that it is not appropriate for simple calculations such as the OP was attempting. Jerry Josie wrote: > The statistical tools in Excel are not reliable. > Use a statistical package such as S-Plus or do the > calculations by hand if they are relatively small. > > Josie > > >>-----Original Message----- >>Can anybody explain why I get different values for >> > regression analysis using > >>the data analysis under "tools" and when the add >> > trendline is used. Note > >>the intercept is not set to zero. >> >> A B >> 2 3 >> 3 4 >> 5 7 >> 7 11 >> 9 13 .... |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

