PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows 2000
Microsoft Windows 2000 Registry
Virtual Memory
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows 2000
Microsoft Windows 2000 Registry
Virtual Memory
![]() |
Virtual Memory |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
A Windows 2000 PC running SP4 with 26 gigs of disk space
is receiving virtual memory errors with the pagefile. I followed KB articles 259151 and 257758 to fix problem but the user still gets the Limited Virtual Memory error upon boot up. There is an article to modify the registry but the article is for NT 4. Is it safe to use KB article 140472 to fix this problem? I have a full backup of the workstation. There was not an article for 2000 to modify the registry. Thanks. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You might try defraging the paging file. In order to do this I use Diskeeper. In Win 9x I was able to turn off the swap file, reboot and defrag the hard drive, then turn the swap file (pagefile) back on and reboot again. I don't know if this works with Win2k and ntfs or not.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In microsoft.public.win2000.registry Lynda wrote:
> A Windows 2000 PC running SP4 with 26 gigs of disk space > is receiving virtual memory errors with the pagefile. I > followed KB articles 259151 and 257758 to fix problem but > the user still gets the Limited Virtual Memory error upon > boot up. There is an article to modify the registry but > the article is for NT 4. Is it safe to use KB article > 140472 to fix this problem? I have a full backup of the > workstation. There was not an article for 2000 to modify > the registry. I did not check that article, becaus you said it was NT4-specific. Determining why would be my first step. If the ACLs (file permissions) on the root directory (location of the pagefile.sys) have been changed, it could be that SYSTEM no longer has adequate permission for one thing. And I recall an issue where a large number of files in the "\" could cause this and/or similar problems... possibley fixed by SP3/4 (fuzzy recollection). Defragmenting the volume may help. Even forcing a CHKDSK /F (or /R) might help. Testing the RAM might reveal a memory problem. Anti-* scanning a must. Assuming no other Event Log entries indicate other issues (eg as with the disk). |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm going from memory here as I did this over a year ago, but you could
try disbaling the paging executive: 1. Navigate to (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management) 2. Add a REG_DWORD "DisbalePagingExecutive" 3. set the value to 1 (=enabled) ONLY DO THIS IF YOU'RE CONFIDENT YOU HAVE PLENTY OF RAM - it's very cheap now anyway. This should force w2k (also XP) to use ALL available RAM before trying to write to pagefile.sys I've found it speeds up both w2k & xp significantly, but only if you have 512Mb or more of RAM. With 1Gb RAM, it really flies! Your machine will still write a pagefile.sys, but only when it absolutely has to. You could also try START/SETTINGS/CONTROL PANEL/SYSTEM/ADVANCED/PERFORMANCE/ADVANCED and changing the max & min pagefile sizes to the same value. I think MS recommends 1.5 x RAM, but I've been running up to 40 apps at once with 1Gb RAM and only 100Mb pagefile. I've been doing this for over a year and the system has NEVER run out of memory or tried to increase the pagefile size. Clearly this might not work for everyone, and you should backup the registry and your data before trying any of this (blah blah blah - disclaimer). Hope this helps. On or about 07/04/2004 07:41, Mark V was seen in the vicinity and allegedly stated: > In microsoft.public.win2000.registry Lynda wrote: > > >>A Windows 2000 PC running SP4 with 26 gigs of disk space >>is receiving virtual memory errors with the pagefile. I >>followed KB articles 259151 and 257758 to fix problem but >>the user still gets the Limited Virtual Memory error upon >>boot up. There is an article to modify the registry but >>the article is for NT 4. Is it safe to use KB article >>140472 to fix this problem? I have a full backup of the >>workstation. There was not an article for 2000 to modify >>the registry. > > > I did not check that article, becaus you said it was NT4-specific. > > Determining why would be my first step. If the ACLs (file permissions) > on the root directory (location of the pagefile.sys) have been changed, > it could be that SYSTEM no longer has adequate permission for one > thing. And I recall an issue where a large number of files in the "\" > could cause this and/or similar problems... possibley fixed by SP3/4 > (fuzzy recollection). > > Defragmenting the volume may help. Even forcing a CHKDSK /F (or /R) > might help. Testing the RAM might reveal a memory problem. Anti-* > scanning a must. Assuming no other Event Log entries indicate other > issues (eg as with the disk). |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I don't think editing the registry directly is going to do it for you.
You'd be better off modifying the registry through the control panel, as follows: First off, optimize you swap file settings. I recommend a file with a minimum of 2x+2 your physical ram, and a max of 4095 on your C drive. (This setting is debatable, btw). Reboot. Boot into "safe mode with command prompt" mode. Delete all instances of the swap file (hidden, system, read only files with the extension *.swp in the root of C:\. Boot into "safe mode". Defrag. Reboot normally. "Lynda" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:1892401c41b42$c2446430$a401280a@phx.gbl... > A Windows 2000 PC running SP4 with 26 gigs of disk space > is receiving virtual memory errors with the pagefile. I > followed KB articles 259151 and 257758 to fix problem but > the user still gets the Limited Virtual Memory error upon > boot up. There is an article to modify the registry but > the article is for NT 4. Is it safe to use KB article > 140472 to fix this problem? I have a full backup of the > workstation. There was not an article for 2000 to modify > the registry. > > Thanks. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In microsoft.public.win2000.registry Gerry Voras wrote:
> I don't think editing the registry directly is going to do it for > you. You'd be better off modifying the registry through the > control panel, as follows: > > First off, optimize you swap file settings. I recommend a file > with a minimum of 2x+2 your physical ram, and a max of 4095 on > your C drive. (This setting is debatable, btw). Reboot. Debatable indeed since we know neither the physical RAM in the system, nor the "workload" in terms of number and type of applications run. > > Boot into "safe mode with command prompt" mode. Delete all > instances of the swap file (hidden, system, read only files with > the extension *.swp in the root of C:\. Boot into "safe mode". > Defrag. Reboot normally. I suspect you are mixing W9x and NTx instructions here. For one thing (and by default) there can only be one "swap" file per partition and it is named: pagefile.sys. More correctly called the paging file in NTx. The chances that filename, location, etc. were altered is exceedingly slim as I see it, although several such files over multiple volumes and/or physical drives is not uncommon. > > "Lynda" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:1892401c41b42$c2446430$a401280a@phx.gbl... >> A Windows 2000 PC running SP4 with 26 gigs of disk space >> is receiving virtual memory errors with the pagefile. I >> followed KB articles 259151 and 257758 to fix problem but >> the user still gets the Limited Virtual Memory error upon >> boot up. There is an article to modify the registry but >> the article is for NT 4. Is it safe to use KB article >> 140472 to fix this problem? I have a full backup of the >> workstation. There was not an article for 2000 to modify >> the registry. >> >> Thanks. > > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

