PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Spyware Announcements
Microsoft AntiSpy.
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Spyware Announcements
Microsoft AntiSpy.
![]() |
Microsoft AntiSpy. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi
I have one computer running the original Giant software. Two other running in the last few days the beta1 release. Taking into consideration that this is a beta1 release I really do not think that there is a place for Bickering to do about, the differences are really minute. There is always few of the Avid Anti -Microsoft that post on Public BBS' the Regular Childish slogans and misinformation. As one that is familiar well with this culture of Public BBS' (Forums), I can state that Microsoft AntiSpy is really getting a Good response. Howver, two real issues are brought up. One issue that comes most often is whether it will stay a free Application updated freely or will become a Fee Service. I think that the sooner Microsoft will announce it intentions concerning this is the better it will be. The second issue is concerning a form of Network Control over the functions of the Application (or a similar application that is network oriented). Giant acknowledged few months ago that they would work on the network aspect in 2005. A statement from Microsoft concerning this issue will be most welcomed by many users. Jack http://www.ezlan.net |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I would like to know whether this going to be free or not either. We already
invested in Windows when we bought our PC, or upgraded from previous version. We should not have to pay extra for problems caused by architectural problems w/in Windows itself. "Jack" <jack@ezlan.net> wrote in message news:ezlqNmd9EHA.2144@cpmsftngsa05.privatenews.microsoft.com... > Hi > > > > I have one computer running the original Giant software. > > > > Two other running in the last few days the beta1 release. > > > > Taking into consideration that this is a beta1 release I really do not > think > that there is a place for Bickering to do about, the differences are > really > minute. > > > > There is always few of the Avid Anti -Microsoft that post on Public BBS' > the > Regular Childish slogans and misinformation. As one that is familiar well > with this culture of Public BBS' (Forums), I can state that Microsoft > AntiSpy is really getting a Good response. > > > > Howver, two real issues are brought up. > > > > One issue that comes most often is whether it will stay a free Application > updated freely or will become a Fee Service. > > > > I think that the sooner Microsoft will announce it intentions concerning > this is the better it will be. > > > > The second issue is concerning a form of Network Control over the > functions > of the Application (or a similar application that is network oriented). > > > > Giant acknowledged few months ago that they would work on the network > aspect > in 2005. A statement from Microsoft concerning this issue will be most > welcomed by many users. > > > > Jack > > http://www.ezlan.net > > > > |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I do not think the cost structure has been determined, or at least released
yet. Do not be to quick to blame spyware on "architectural problems", much is easily preventable by common sense safe computing. -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/ "Jason" <bogusaddy(at)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%23BECCmf9EHA.1644@CPMSFTNGSA04.privatenews.microsoft.com... >I would like to know whether this going to be free or not either. We >already invested in Windows when we bought our PC, or upgraded from >previous version. We should not have to pay extra for problems caused by >architectural problems w/in Windows itself. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
>-----Original Message-----
>I do not think the cost structure has been determined, or at least released >yet. >Do not be to quick to blame spyware on "architectural problems", much is >easily preventable by common sense safe computing. > >-- >Jupiter Jones [MVP] >http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/ Well, you are right there. Common sense, and care while suring the internet does help prevent 99% of the possible adware infections. Afterall, since I switched to Firefox, I've not seen a single report of spyware during my weekly scans, and even the MS scanner only picked up three things, two being applications I use (RealVNC, and I forget the other) and two bookmarks in my favorites folder). On the other hand, before I switched, I was cleaning several different pieces of spyware from my system every week. Yup, common sense tells us that using Microsoft web browsers leads to spyware. Eric the Grey |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I do not find any spyware when I use Microsoft.
So to use logic similar to what you used, one of us is using Microsoft browsers wrong. Instead of attempting to blame one or the other, you may be better off determining what you are doing differently otherwise you may eventually have similar problems with whatever you use. -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/ "Eric the Grey" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:15ec01c4f5fe$a02f01b0$a401280a@phx.gbl... > Well, you are right there. Common sense, and care while > suring the internet does help prevent 99% of the possible > adware infections. > > Afterall, since I switched to Firefox, I've not seen a > single report of spyware during my weekly scans, and even > the MS scanner only picked up three things, two being > applications I use (RealVNC, and I forget the other) and > two bookmarks in my favorites folder). > > On the other hand, before I switched, I was cleaning > several different pieces of spyware from my system every week. > > Yup, common sense tells us that using Microsoft web > browsers leads to spyware. > > Eric the Grey |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Cudo's Jack, All I'm seeing is complaining about a typo,
or spelling, goodness, its Beta1. Anyhow, as an Enterprise Systems Engineer, I can't wait to see th ADM or group policy template (which is the route I HOPE they take) for pushing this out and centrally admining it. Just like they have with the SUS client. This would be a god send to control all this on the policy side and base it upon different OU's/Business Structures and needs. I look forward to seeing some Alpha/Beta snippets for the corporate side. Mike >-----Original Message----- >Hi > > > >I have one computer running the original Giant software. > > > >Two other running in the last few days the beta1 release. > > > >Taking into consideration that this is a beta1 release I really do not think >that there is a place for Bickering to do about, the differences are really >minute. > > > >There is always few of the Avid Anti -Microsoft that post on Public BBS' the >Regular Childish slogans and misinformation. As one that is familiar well >with this culture of Public BBS' (Forums), I can state that Microsoft >AntiSpy is really getting a Good response. > > > >Howver, two real issues are brought up. > > > >One issue that comes most often is whether it will stay a free Application >updated freely or will become a Fee Service. > > > >I think that the sooner Microsoft will announce it intentions concerning >this is the better it will be. > > > >The second issue is concerning a form of Network Control over the functions >of the Application (or a similar application that is network oriented). > > > >Giant acknowledged few months ago that they would work on the network aspect >in 2005. A statement from Microsoft concerning this issue will be most >welcomed by many users. > > > >Jack > >http://www.ezlan.net > > > > >. > |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> Instead of attempting to blame one or the other, you may be better off
> determining what you are doing differently I bet the difference is starting IE with admin rights. Al. "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message news:O8Z2MQg9EHA.1960@CPMSFTNGSA04.privatenews.microsoft.com... >I do not find any spyware when I use Microsoft. > So to use logic similar to what you used, one of us is using Microsoft > browsers wrong. > Instead of attempting to blame one or the other, you may be better off > determining what you are doing differently otherwise you may eventually > have similar problems with whatever you use. > > -- > Jupiter Jones [MVP] > http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/ > > > "Eric the Grey" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:15ec01c4f5fe$a02f01b0$a401280a@phx.gbl... >> Well, you are right there. Common sense, and care while >> suring the internet does help prevent 99% of the possible >> adware infections. >> >> Afterall, since I switched to Firefox, I've not seen a >> single report of spyware during my weekly scans, and even >> the MS scanner only picked up three things, two being >> applications I use (RealVNC, and I forget the other) and >> two bookmarks in my favorites folder). >> >> On the other hand, before I switched, I was cleaning >> several different pieces of spyware from my system every week. >> >> Yup, common sense tells us that using Microsoft web >> browsers leads to spyware. >> >> Eric the Grey > > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 


