PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Spyware Announcements
This aint no Giant....
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Spyware Announcements
This aint no Giant....
![]() |
This aint no Giant.... |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have Giant Antispyware running on a PC, and a scan
found over 100 regtistry keys considered to be serious spyware concerns, and a few spyware files. I did not remove them, but instead ran a test: I un-installed Giant and installed the new MS Beta product, updated the defs, and scanned again. The MS Beta found almost no problems, and found only 1 registry key threat. I guess MS must have removed many of the spyware definitions used by Giant? Both products were configured to do a full system scan, but the MS version only actually scanned a fraction of the files scanned by Giant. Maybe MS is taking a very conservative approach on what is considered spyware for now? I would like to see that question addressed in a press release. Why does Giant find so much more spyware? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Make sure your doing a full system scan instead of the
quick scan. see your options button below the scan now button. >-----Original Message----- >I have Giant Antispyware running on a PC, and a scan >found over 100 regtistry keys considered to be serious >spyware concerns, and a few spyware files. I did not >remove them, but instead ran a test: I un-installed Giant >and installed the new MS Beta product, updated the defs, >and scanned again. The MS Beta found almost no problems, >and found only 1 registry key threat. I guess MS must >have removed many of the spyware definitions used by >Giant? Both products were configured to do a full system >scan, but the MS version only actually scanned a fraction >of the files scanned by Giant. Maybe MS is taking a very >conservative approach on what is considered spyware for >now? I would like to see that question addressed in a >press release. Why does Giant find so much more spyware? >. > |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Also remember this is a new beta version of Giant's
software with Microsoft's name. So you have to expect some bugs and perhaps a few less definitions. >-----Original Message----- >I have Giant Antispyware running on a PC, and a scan >found over 100 regtistry keys considered to be serious >spyware concerns, and a few spyware files. I did not >remove them, but instead ran a test: I un-installed Giant >and installed the new MS Beta product, updated the defs, >and scanned again. The MS Beta found almost no problems, >and found only 1 registry key threat. I guess MS must >have removed many of the spyware definitions used by >Giant? Both products were configured to do a full system >scan, but the MS version only actually scanned a fraction >of the files scanned by Giant. Maybe MS is taking a very >conservative approach on what is considered spyware for >now? I would like to see that question addressed in a >press release. Why does Giant find so much more spyware? >. > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have mine set for a full system deep scan but only get a minimum scan.
-- Ambrose F. "Buddy" Morel bmorel@accesstoledo.com Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together. "Quilnux" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:143201c4f5a5$777bfd80$a401280a@phx.gbl... > Make sure your doing a full system scan instead of the > quick scan. see your options button below the scan now > button. > >>-----Original Message----- >>I have Giant Antispyware running on a PC, and a scan >>found over 100 regtistry keys considered to be serious >>spyware concerns, and a few spyware files. I did not >>remove them, but instead ran a test: I un-installed > Giant >>and installed the new MS Beta product, updated the defs, >>and scanned again. The MS Beta found almost no > problems, >>and found only 1 registry key threat. I guess MS must >>have removed many of the spyware definitions used by >>Giant? Both products were configured to do a full > system >>scan, but the MS version only actually scanned a > fraction >>of the files scanned by Giant. Maybe MS is taking a > very >>conservative approach on what is considered spyware for >>now? I would like to see that question addressed in a >>press release. Why does Giant find so much more spyware? >>. >> |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes, Please remember that Beta software does no reflect
the actual outcome of the software. It may contain bugs, instabilities, flaws, security holes, lack of quality and, features (including definitions). Please do not expect everything to fall into place right away. I am not sure how many people participating in this Beta test have Beta tested other products before. This is more of a notation for people new to beta testing and/or Beta software. >-----Original Message----- >Also remember this is a new beta version of Giant's >software with Microsoft's name. So you have to expect >some bugs and perhaps a few less definitions. > >>-----Original Message----- >>I have Giant Antispyware running on a PC, and a scan >>found over 100 regtistry keys considered to be serious >>spyware concerns, and a few spyware files. I did not >>remove them, but instead ran a test: I un-installed >Giant >>and installed the new MS Beta product, updated the defs, >>and scanned again. The MS Beta found almost no >problems, >>and found only 1 registry key threat. I guess MS must >>have removed many of the spyware definitions used by >>Giant? Both products were configured to do a full >system >>scan, but the MS version only actually scanned a >fraction >>of the files scanned by Giant. Maybe MS is taking a >very >>conservative approach on what is considered spyware for >>now? I would like to see that question addressed in a >>press release. Why does Giant find so much more spyware? >>. >> >. > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

