PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Spyware Announcements
Not all spyware/adware detected
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Spyware Announcements
Not all spyware/adware detected
![]() |
Not all spyware/adware detected |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I would like to suggest a place where Beta users can post
spyware that was not detected. If anyone at Microsoft actually reads this, please consider it. I installed the Beta last night on my home PC and, within minutes after the reboot, started seeing pop-ups. I ran another spyware application to see if the pop-ups were a seperate issue and just to compare. It found twelve 'suspects'. One of them was the infamous GAIN. To be fair, only one was actually spyware; however, that is one too many. I am willing to pay for a subscription service that works (like I do for my virus protection). But I would not pay for something that 'mostly' works. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Here are a couple of comments:
1) Cookie scanning is not enabled in this beta of the product. This accounts for a good many of the differences in scans from this product and others such as Lavasoft's Ad-aware Personal SE and Spybot Search & Destroy. 2) If you have spyware in place and it isn't being recognized by Microsoft AntiSpyware, there is a mechanism in the product to report that: Tools, Suspected Spyware Report. Microsoft needs this data--by all means if you've got something resistent or simply unrecognized in place, especially if it got in after the real-time Agents were in place, send these reports. "Victor Buller" <vbuller@kc.rr.com> wrote in message news:055d01c4f4c3$685ef470$a501280a@phx.gbl... >I would like to suggest a place where Beta users can post > spyware that was not detected. If anyone at Microsoft > actually reads this, please consider it. I installed the > Beta last night on my home PC and, within minutes after > the reboot, started seeing pop-ups. I ran another spyware > application to see if the pop-ups were a seperate issue > and just to compare. It found twelve 'suspects'. One of > them was the infamous GAIN. To be fair, only one was > actually spyware; however, that is one too many. I am > willing to pay for a subscription service that works (like > I do for my virus protection). But I would not pay for > something that 'mostly' works. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You can go to the Tools menu and choose "Suspected
Spyware" to report it. >-----Original Message----- >I would like to suggest a place where Beta users can post >spyware that was not detected. If anyone at Microsoft >actually reads this, please consider it. I installed the >Beta last night on my home PC and, within minutes after >the reboot, started seeing pop-ups. I ran another spyware >application to see if the pop-ups were a seperate issue >and just to compare. It found twelve 'suspects'. One of >them was the infamous GAIN. To be fair, only one was >actually spyware; however, that is one too many. I am >willing to pay for a subscription service that works (like >I do for my virus protection). But I would not pay for >something that 'mostly' works. >. > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Will the cookie piece be avaliable for beta, or will this
only be avaliable when the product is released for retail sales. >-----Original Message----- >Here are a couple of comments: > >1) Cookie scanning is not enabled in this beta of the product. This >accounts for a good many of the differences in scans from this product and >others such as Lavasoft's Ad-aware Personal SE and Spybot Search & Destroy. > >2) If you have spyware in place and it isn't being recognized by Microsoft >AntiSpyware, there is a mechanism in the product to report that: Tools, >Suspected Spyware Report. > >Microsoft needs this data--by all means if you've got something resistent or >simply unrecognized in place, especially if it got in after the real-time >Agents were in place, send these reports. > > >"Victor Buller" <vbuller@kc.rr.com> wrote in message >news:055d01c4f4c3$685ef470$a501280a@phx.gbl... >>I would like to suggest a place where Beta users can post >> spyware that was not detected. If anyone at Microsoft >> actually reads this, please consider it. I installed the >> Beta last night on my home PC and, within minutes after >> the reboot, started seeing pop-ups. I ran another spyware >> application to see if the pop-ups were a seperate issue >> and just to compare. It found twelve 'suspects'. One of >> them was the infamous GAIN. To be fair, only one was >> actually spyware; however, that is one too many. I am >> willing to pay for a subscription service that works (like >> I do for my virus protection). But I would not pay for >> something that 'mostly' works. > > >. > |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I don't have any information about future plans for anything--beta, product,
etc. <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:06e301c4f4e2$0f7d9090$a501280a@phx.gbl... > Will the cookie piece be avaliable for beta, or will this > only be avaliable when the product is released for retail > sales. > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>Here are a couple of comments: >> >>1) Cookie scanning is not enabled in this beta of the > product. This >>accounts for a good many of the differences in scans from > this product and >>others such as Lavasoft's Ad-aware Personal SE and Spybot > Search & Destroy. >> >>2) If you have spyware in place and it isn't being > recognized by Microsoft >>AntiSpyware, there is a mechanism in the product to > report that: Tools, >>Suspected Spyware Report. >> >>Microsoft needs this data--by all means if you've got > something resistent or >>simply unrecognized in place, especially if it got in > after the real-time >>Agents were in place, send these reports. >> >> >>"Victor Buller" <vbuller@kc.rr.com> wrote in message >>news:055d01c4f4c3$685ef470$a501280a@phx.gbl... >>>I would like to suggest a place where Beta users can post >>> spyware that was not detected. If anyone at Microsoft >>> actually reads this, please consider it. I installed > the >>> Beta last night on my home PC and, within minutes after >>> the reboot, started seeing pop-ups. I ran another > spyware >>> application to see if the pop-ups were a seperate issue >>> and just to compare. It found twelve 'suspects'. One > of >>> them was the infamous GAIN. To be fair, only one was >>> actually spyware; however, that is one too many. I am >>> willing to pay for a subscription service that works > (like >>> I do for my virus protection). But I would not pay for >>> something that 'mostly' works. >> >> >>. >> |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have been trying to use the reporting tool (Tools-
Suspected Spyware), but it keeps erroring out. >-----Original Message----- >You can go to the Tools menu and choose "Suspected >Spyware" to report it. >>-----Original Message----- >>I would like to suggest a place where Beta users can >post >>spyware that was not detected. If anyone at Microsoft >>actually reads this, please consider it. I installed >the >>Beta last night on my home PC and, within minutes after >>the reboot, started seeing pop-ups. I ran another >spyware >>application to see if the pop-ups were a seperate issue >>and just to compare. It found twelve 'suspects'. One >of >>them was the infamous GAIN. To be fair, only one was >>actually spyware; however, that is one too many. I am >>willing to pay for a subscription service that works >(like >>I do for my virus protection). But I would not pay for >>something that 'mostly' works. >>. >> >. > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

