PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Spyware Application Compatibility
Possible Bug with 2 legit apps
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Spyware Application Compatibility
Possible Bug with 2 legit apps
![]() |
Possible Bug with 2 legit apps |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have found when doing a memory scan with MSA when I run
DiamondCS Port Explorer v 2.0 or TDS-3, I always get not responding in the memory scan from MSA and the CPU performance shoots up to 80 to 90 percent. Must be that running TSD-3 or Port Explorer when MSA is trying to scan in the memory is taking up too much memory when trying to scan and MSA stops responding. I can close Explorer v 2.0 and TDS-3 and the memory scan seem to work fine. I have no way to verify that but it's very consistant. Regards, Hardhead |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks - can you post URLs to find these two apps, so that Microsoft can
reproduce this if they need to? -- FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware: http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm "Hardhead" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:82ad01c52821$17adb8e0$a401280a@phx.gbl... >I have found when doing a memory scan with MSA when I run > DiamondCS Port Explorer v 2.0 or TDS-3, I always get not > responding in the memory scan from MSA and the CPU > performance shoots up to 80 to 90 percent. > > Must be that running TSD-3 or Port Explorer when MSA is > trying to scan in the memory is taking up too much memory > when trying to scan and MSA stops responding. I can close > Explorer v 2.0 and TDS-3 and the memory scan seem to work > fine. I have no way to verify that but it's very consistant. > > Regards, > Hardhead |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello Bill Sanderson,
Thanks for your reply. You will find PortExplorer v 2.0 @ http://www.diamondcs.com.au/portexplorer/ and TDS-3 @ http://tds.diamondcs.com.au/ Regard, Hardhead >-----Original Message----- >Thanks - can you post URLs to find these two apps, so that Microsoft can >reproduce this if they need to? >-- >FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware: >http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm > >"Hardhead" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >news:82ad01c52821$17adb8e0$a401280a@phx.gbl... >>I have found when doing a memory scan with MSA when I run >> DiamondCS Port Explorer v 2.0 or TDS-3, I always get not >> responding in the memory scan from MSA and the CPU >> performance shoots up to 80 to 90 percent. >> >> Must be that running TSD-3 or Port Explorer when MSA is >> trying to scan in the memory is taking up too much memory >> when trying to scan and MSA stops responding. I can close >> Explorer v 2.0 and TDS-3 and the memory scan seem to work >> fine. I have no way to verify that but it's very consistant. >> >> Regards, >> Hardhead > > >. > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Oops.........
Sorry I forgot to add that I'm running registered versions of both PortExplorer v 2.0 and TDS-3. There should be no problem using the free evaluation version of PortExplorer v 2.0, but the TDS-3 free evaluation version is not a full blown app and will not have the Execution Protection installed. Regards, Hardhead >-----Original Message----- >Hello Bill Sanderson, >Thanks for your reply. > >You will find PortExplorer v 2.0 @ >http://www.diamondcs.com.au/portexplorer/ >and TDS-3 @ http://tds.diamondcs.com.au/ > >Regard, >Hardhead >>-----Original Message----- >>Thanks - can you post URLs to find these two apps, so that >Microsoft can >>reproduce this if they need to? >>-- >>FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware: >>http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm >> >>"Hardhead" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in >message >>news:82ad01c52821$17adb8e0$a401280a@phx.gbl... >>>I have found when doing a memory scan with MSA when I run >>> DiamondCS Port Explorer v 2.0 or TDS-3, I always get not >>> responding in the memory scan from MSA and the CPU >>> performance shoots up to 80 to 90 percent. >>> >>> Must be that running TSD-3 or Port Explorer when MSA is >>> trying to scan in the memory is taking up too much memory >>> when trying to scan and MSA stops responding. I can close >>> Explorer v 2.0 and TDS-3 and the memory scan seem to work >>> fine. I have no way to verify that but it's very consistant. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Hardhead >> >> >>. >> >. > |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks!
-- FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware: http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:7d0301c52853$da9101a0$a601280a@phx.gbl... > Hello Bill Sanderson, > Thanks for your reply. > > You will find PortExplorer v 2.0 @ > http://www.diamondcs.com.au/portexplorer/ > and TDS-3 @ http://tds.diamondcs.com.au/ > > Regard, > Hardhead >>-----Original Message----- >>Thanks - can you post URLs to find these two apps, so that > Microsoft can >>reproduce this if they need to? >>-- >>FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware: >>http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm >> >>"Hardhead" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in > message >>news:82ad01c52821$17adb8e0$a401280a@phx.gbl... >>>I have found when doing a memory scan with MSA when I run >>> DiamondCS Port Explorer v 2.0 or TDS-3, I always get not >>> responding in the memory scan from MSA and the CPU >>> performance shoots up to 80 to 90 percent. >>> >>> Must be that running TSD-3 or Port Explorer when MSA is >>> trying to scan in the memory is taking up too much memory >>> when trying to scan and MSA stops responding. I can close >>> Explorer v 2.0 and TDS-3 and the memory scan seem to work >>> fine. I have no way to verify that but it's very consistant. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Hardhead >> >> >>. >> |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks for the clarification.
-- FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware: http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm "Hardhead" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:7d1801c52856$4253e4e0$a601280a@phx.gbl... > Oops......... > > Sorry I forgot to add that I'm running registered versions > of both PortExplorer v 2.0 and TDS-3. There should be no > problem using the free evaluation version of PortExplorer v > 2.0, but the TDS-3 free evaluation version is not a full > blown app and will not have the Execution Protection > installed. > > Regards, > Hardhead >>-----Original Message----- >>Hello Bill Sanderson, >>Thanks for your reply. >> >>You will find PortExplorer v 2.0 @ >>http://www.diamondcs.com.au/portexplorer/ >>and TDS-3 @ http://tds.diamondcs.com.au/ >> >>Regard, >>Hardhead >>>-----Original Message----- >>>Thanks - can you post URLs to find these two apps, so that >>Microsoft can >>>reproduce this if they need to? >>>-- >>>FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware: >>>http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm >>> >>>"Hardhead" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in >>message >>>news:82ad01c52821$17adb8e0$a401280a@phx.gbl... >>>>I have found when doing a memory scan with MSA when I run >>>> DiamondCS Port Explorer v 2.0 or TDS-3, I always get not >>>> responding in the memory scan from MSA and the CPU >>>> performance shoots up to 80 to 90 percent. >>>> >>>> Must be that running TSD-3 or Port Explorer when MSA is >>>> trying to scan in the memory is taking up too much memory >>>> when trying to scan and MSA stops responding. I can close >>>> Explorer v 2.0 and TDS-3 and the memory scan seem to work >>>> fine. I have no way to verify that but it's very > consistant. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Hardhead >>> >>> >>>. >>> >>. >> |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Have you tried a reinstall of either PortExplorer or MSAS?
I just loaded the PortExplorer2.0 Eval(nice program!) and I am running MSAS scan now and I am not having a problem. My machine is Windows XP SP2 with P4 2.8 and 512mb ram. JohnF. "Hardhead" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:7d1801c52856$4253e4e0$a601280a@phx.gbl... > Oops......... > > Sorry I forgot to add that I'm running registered versions > of both PortExplorer v 2.0 and TDS-3. There should be no > problem using the free evaluation version of PortExplorer v > 2.0, but the TDS-3 free evaluation version is not a full > blown app and will not have the Execution Protection > installed. > > Regards, > Hardhead >>-----Original Message----- >>Hello Bill Sanderson, >>Thanks for your reply. >> >>You will find PortExplorer v 2.0 @ >>http://www.diamondcs.com.au/portexplorer/ >>and TDS-3 @ http://tds.diamondcs.com.au/ >> >>Regard, >>Hardhead >>>-----Original Message----- >>>Thanks - can you post URLs to find these two apps, so that >>Microsoft can >>>reproduce this if they need to? >>>-- >>>FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware: >>>http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm >>> >>>"Hardhead" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in >>message >>>news:82ad01c52821$17adb8e0$a401280a@phx.gbl... >>>>I have found when doing a memory scan with MSA when I run >>>> DiamondCS Port Explorer v 2.0 or TDS-3, I always get not >>>> responding in the memory scan from MSA and the CPU >>>> performance shoots up to 80 to 90 percent. >>>> >>>> Must be that running TSD-3 or Port Explorer when MSA is >>>> trying to scan in the memory is taking up too much memory >>>> when trying to scan and MSA stops responding. I can close >>>> Explorer v 2.0 and TDS-3 and the memory scan seem to work >>>> fine. I have no way to verify that but it's very > consistant. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Hardhead >>> >>> >>>. >>> >>. >> |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

