PC Review Forums Newsgroups Microsoft AntiSpyware Spyware Application Compatibility Possible Bug with 2 legit apps

Reply

Possible Bug with 2 legit apps

 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 13-03-2005, 11:05 PM   #1
Hardhead
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Possible Bug with 2 legit apps


I have found when doing a memory scan with MSA when I run
DiamondCS Port Explorer v 2.0 or TDS-3, I always get not
responding in the memory scan from MSA and the CPU
performance shoots up to 80 to 90 percent.

Must be that running TSD-3 or Port Explorer when MSA is
trying to scan in the memory is taking up too much memory
when trying to scan and MSA stops responding. I can close
Explorer v 2.0 and TDS-3 and the memory scan seem to work
fine. I have no way to verify that but it's very consistant.

Regards,
Hardhead
  Reply With Quote
Old 13-03-2005, 11:55 PM   #2
Bill Sanderson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Possible Bug with 2 legit apps

Thanks - can you post URLs to find these two apps, so that Microsoft can
reproduce this if they need to?
--
FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware:
http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

"Hardhead" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:82ad01c52821$17adb8e0$a401280a@phx.gbl...
>I have found when doing a memory scan with MSA when I run
> DiamondCS Port Explorer v 2.0 or TDS-3, I always get not
> responding in the memory scan from MSA and the CPU
> performance shoots up to 80 to 90 percent.
>
> Must be that running TSD-3 or Port Explorer when MSA is
> trying to scan in the memory is taking up too much memory
> when trying to scan and MSA stops responding. I can close
> Explorer v 2.0 and TDS-3 and the memory scan seem to work
> fine. I have no way to verify that but it's very consistant.
>
> Regards,
> Hardhead



  Reply With Quote
Old 14-03-2005, 05:08 AM   #3
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Possible Bug with 2 legit apps

Hello Bill Sanderson,
Thanks for your reply.

You will find PortExplorer v 2.0 @
http://www.diamondcs.com.au/portexplorer/
and TDS-3 @ http://tds.diamondcs.com.au/

Regard,
Hardhead
>-----Original Message-----
>Thanks - can you post URLs to find these two apps, so that

Microsoft can
>reproduce this if they need to?
>--
>FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware:
>http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>
>"Hardhead" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in

message
>news:82ad01c52821$17adb8e0$a401280a@phx.gbl...
>>I have found when doing a memory scan with MSA when I run
>> DiamondCS Port Explorer v 2.0 or TDS-3, I always get not
>> responding in the memory scan from MSA and the CPU
>> performance shoots up to 80 to 90 percent.
>>
>> Must be that running TSD-3 or Port Explorer when MSA is
>> trying to scan in the memory is taking up too much memory
>> when trying to scan and MSA stops responding. I can close
>> Explorer v 2.0 and TDS-3 and the memory scan seem to work
>> fine. I have no way to verify that but it's very consistant.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Hardhead

>
>
>.
>

  Reply With Quote
Old 14-03-2005, 05:25 AM   #4
Hardhead
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Possible Bug with 2 legit apps

Oops.........

Sorry I forgot to add that I'm running registered versions
of both PortExplorer v 2.0 and TDS-3. There should be no
problem using the free evaluation version of PortExplorer v
2.0, but the TDS-3 free evaluation version is not a full
blown app and will not have the Execution Protection
installed.

Regards,
Hardhead
>-----Original Message-----
>Hello Bill Sanderson,
>Thanks for your reply.
>
>You will find PortExplorer v 2.0 @
>http://www.diamondcs.com.au/portexplorer/
>and TDS-3 @ http://tds.diamondcs.com.au/
>
>Regard,
>Hardhead
>>-----Original Message-----
>>Thanks - can you post URLs to find these two apps, so that

>Microsoft can
>>reproduce this if they need to?
>>--
>>FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware:
>>http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>>
>>"Hardhead" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in

>message
>>news:82ad01c52821$17adb8e0$a401280a@phx.gbl...
>>>I have found when doing a memory scan with MSA when I run
>>> DiamondCS Port Explorer v 2.0 or TDS-3, I always get not
>>> responding in the memory scan from MSA and the CPU
>>> performance shoots up to 80 to 90 percent.
>>>
>>> Must be that running TSD-3 or Port Explorer when MSA is
>>> trying to scan in the memory is taking up too much memory
>>> when trying to scan and MSA stops responding. I can close
>>> Explorer v 2.0 and TDS-3 and the memory scan seem to work
>>> fine. I have no way to verify that but it's very

consistant.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Hardhead

>>
>>
>>.
>>

>.
>

  Reply With Quote
Old 14-03-2005, 03:59 PM   #5
Bill Sanderson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Possible Bug with 2 legit apps

Thanks!

--
FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware:
http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7d0301c52853$da9101a0$a601280a@phx.gbl...
> Hello Bill Sanderson,
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> You will find PortExplorer v 2.0 @
> http://www.diamondcs.com.au/portexplorer/
> and TDS-3 @ http://tds.diamondcs.com.au/
>
> Regard,
> Hardhead
>>-----Original Message-----
>>Thanks - can you post URLs to find these two apps, so that

> Microsoft can
>>reproduce this if they need to?
>>--
>>FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware:
>>http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>>
>>"Hardhead" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in

> message
>>news:82ad01c52821$17adb8e0$a401280a@phx.gbl...
>>>I have found when doing a memory scan with MSA when I run
>>> DiamondCS Port Explorer v 2.0 or TDS-3, I always get not
>>> responding in the memory scan from MSA and the CPU
>>> performance shoots up to 80 to 90 percent.
>>>
>>> Must be that running TSD-3 or Port Explorer when MSA is
>>> trying to scan in the memory is taking up too much memory
>>> when trying to scan and MSA stops responding. I can close
>>> Explorer v 2.0 and TDS-3 and the memory scan seem to work
>>> fine. I have no way to verify that but it's very consistant.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Hardhead

>>
>>
>>.
>>



  Reply With Quote
Old 14-03-2005, 04:00 PM   #6
Bill Sanderson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Possible Bug with 2 legit apps

Thanks for the clarification.
--
FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware:
http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

"Hardhead" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7d1801c52856$4253e4e0$a601280a@phx.gbl...
> Oops.........
>
> Sorry I forgot to add that I'm running registered versions
> of both PortExplorer v 2.0 and TDS-3. There should be no
> problem using the free evaluation version of PortExplorer v
> 2.0, but the TDS-3 free evaluation version is not a full
> blown app and will not have the Execution Protection
> installed.
>
> Regards,
> Hardhead
>>-----Original Message-----
>>Hello Bill Sanderson,
>>Thanks for your reply.
>>
>>You will find PortExplorer v 2.0 @
>>http://www.diamondcs.com.au/portexplorer/
>>and TDS-3 @ http://tds.diamondcs.com.au/
>>
>>Regard,
>>Hardhead
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>Thanks - can you post URLs to find these two apps, so that

>>Microsoft can
>>>reproduce this if they need to?
>>>--
>>>FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware:
>>>http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>>>
>>>"Hardhead" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in

>>message
>>>news:82ad01c52821$17adb8e0$a401280a@phx.gbl...
>>>>I have found when doing a memory scan with MSA when I run
>>>> DiamondCS Port Explorer v 2.0 or TDS-3, I always get not
>>>> responding in the memory scan from MSA and the CPU
>>>> performance shoots up to 80 to 90 percent.
>>>>
>>>> Must be that running TSD-3 or Port Explorer when MSA is
>>>> trying to scan in the memory is taking up too much memory
>>>> when trying to scan and MSA stops responding. I can close
>>>> Explorer v 2.0 and TDS-3 and the memory scan seem to work
>>>> fine. I have no way to verify that but it's very

> consistant.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Hardhead
>>>
>>>
>>>.
>>>

>>.
>>



  Reply With Quote
Old 17-03-2005, 10:18 PM   #7
JohnF.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Possible Bug with 2 legit apps

Have you tried a reinstall of either PortExplorer or MSAS?

I just loaded the PortExplorer2.0 Eval(nice program!) and I am running MSAS
scan now and I am not having a problem. My machine is Windows XP SP2 with
P4 2.8 and 512mb ram.

JohnF.



"Hardhead" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7d1801c52856$4253e4e0$a601280a@phx.gbl...
> Oops.........
>
> Sorry I forgot to add that I'm running registered versions
> of both PortExplorer v 2.0 and TDS-3. There should be no
> problem using the free evaluation version of PortExplorer v
> 2.0, but the TDS-3 free evaluation version is not a full
> blown app and will not have the Execution Protection
> installed.
>
> Regards,
> Hardhead
>>-----Original Message-----
>>Hello Bill Sanderson,
>>Thanks for your reply.
>>
>>You will find PortExplorer v 2.0 @
>>http://www.diamondcs.com.au/portexplorer/
>>and TDS-3 @ http://tds.diamondcs.com.au/
>>
>>Regard,
>>Hardhead
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>Thanks - can you post URLs to find these two apps, so that

>>Microsoft can
>>>reproduce this if they need to?
>>>--
>>>FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware:
>>>http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>>>
>>>"Hardhead" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in

>>message
>>>news:82ad01c52821$17adb8e0$a401280a@phx.gbl...
>>>>I have found when doing a memory scan with MSA when I run
>>>> DiamondCS Port Explorer v 2.0 or TDS-3, I always get not
>>>> responding in the memory scan from MSA and the CPU
>>>> performance shoots up to 80 to 90 percent.
>>>>
>>>> Must be that running TSD-3 or Port Explorer when MSA is
>>>> trying to scan in the memory is taking up too much memory
>>>> when trying to scan and MSA stops responding. I can close
>>>> Explorer v 2.0 and TDS-3 and the memory scan seem to work
>>>> fine. I have no way to verify that but it's very

> consistant.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Hardhead
>>>
>>>
>>>.
>>>

>>.
>>



  Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off