PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Spyware Discussion
malware from newsgroup posts with binaries?
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Spyware Discussion
malware from newsgroup posts with binaries?
![]() |
malware from newsgroup posts with binaries? |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Can this happen? If so, how much of a threat is it and what if anything can
be done about it? I use (and update and run almost daily) Ad-Aware, AVG Free, Microsoft Antispyware, Spybot Search & Destroy, Spyware Blaster, and Sygate Personal Firewall. Windows 2000 Pro. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Walterius wrote :
> Can this happen? If so, how much of a threat is it and what if anything can > be done about it? > > I use (and update and run almost daily) Ad-Aware, AVG Free, Microsoft > Antispyware, Spybot Search & Destroy, Spyware Blaster, and Sygate Personal > Firewall. Windows 2000 Pro. Hi Of course, all binaries can carry malware and have "friendly" names. If you also running Outlook Express you have a really weak protection against new unprotected malwares. So be careful with newsgroups which also handle binaries. -- plun -- This is an automatic signature of MesNews. Site : http://www.mesnews.net |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Absolutely, and it is a serious threat.
In most newsgroups it's advisable to handle binaries with great care--I can recall a time in an antivirus group when some character was posting a different virus to the group daily--he had a pretty good collection. He was also not covering his tracks, particularly, and disappeared rather quickly. I suspect you are talking about a binaries group--one whose purpose is the exchange of binary objects. I was once discussing a similar topic with a Microsoft staff person--he remarked that one signifigant sized binary object that many users will download and run without thinking twice about it is an MP3. If you run the bad guy's code on your machine, it's not your machine anymore. Additionally, the precise suffix and name of a given object doesn't necessarily define precisely how it is handled if you double click on it. So--what do you do? I'm probably not the right person to answer this part 'cause I tend more towards sunny optimism than dour paranoia. Know the source. Open the file with an application--and choose one which you know the vendor keeps updated for security issues such as buffer overflows--such issues are found in most complex software that handles binaries- media players, for example. Test the files with your antivirus which you keep updated. If something is reasonably short, and you are suspicious, use a resource such as: http://www.virustotal.com http://virusscan.jotti.org to scan it with multiple vendors. This is of no help if what you have is new, or somehow beneath the radar of these vendors, though. I'm not usually one for telling other people how to behave, but if the binaries aren't ones normally easily available from a reputable source, the risks are more than just simple virus/spyware issues. There've been studies of the objects available in various peer-to-peer sharing networks, and the news isn't good in terms of the proportion of stuff out there that is not what it is described as. -- "Walterius" <invalid@nowhere.not> wrote in message news:OO7CtjlXFHA.924@CPMSFTNGSA04.privatenews.microsoft.com... > Can this happen? If so, how much of a threat is it and what if anything > can > be done about it? > > I use (and update and run almost daily) Ad-Aware, AVG Free, Microsoft > Antispyware, Spybot Search & Destroy, Spyware Blaster, and Sygate Personal > Firewall. Windows 2000 Pro. > > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

