PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Spyware Discussion
Failure to update and settings don't stick
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Spyware Discussion
Failure to update and settings don't stick
![]() |
Failure to update and settings don't stick |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
No reply is necessary. These are just observations to pass along to the
development team as I already know how to work around the problem or the problem is trivial enough that I can live with it. The first is a pass-along from another user: he wanted to thank Microsoft for helping him make a few hundred bucks by providing an easy (and thus far free) tool to help clean up his clients' computers. I can echo some of those sentiments (except the extra money part). Even on the most badly infected machine on my campus, it took three or four thorough sweeps to clean out everything and the machine now runs like new. What I'm seeing so far is a very easy-to-use product that does what it claims. First problem: in spite of an earlier claim to the contrary, the program is still not updating its definitions before it begins the initial scan. I just finished downloading and installing it on a friend's computer. The install completed just fine and I started the initial deep scan at 11:45. At 11:47 the firewall reported that MAS was trying to access the internet. At 11:49 MAS reported that it had up-to-date definitions. Machine configuration: Athlon XP 2500, 1 GB RAM, WinXP w/SP2 and Norton Internet Security 2004. Nothing odd about the rest of the setup except that the machine has XP running in its own partition with applications and data on a separate volume. Second problem: I'm testing out the product at my campus. We're running on a Win2K domain with lots of configurations pushed out by GPOs. When I log on to my machine, MAS reports that something is attempting to change my intranet security settings (a GPO applied at logon) and asks whether I want to allow it or not. Even with the "remember this" box checked, MAS does not remember the change. At worst, it's a one-second annoyance that happens at logon and I can live with it (it's a beta after all). But it really should be fixed by the time of the release version. Machine configuration: Pentium 4 2GHz, 512MB RAM, Win2K Pro w/SP4 in a Win2K AD domain, Symantec Corporate 8.0, no software firewall Third issue: even though MAS is still in beta form, I don't think there is any question but that it will be used in AD environments when released in final form. I know of several small offices that are using it under SBS and are pretty happy with how it behaves (whether they will continue to use it when released is going to depend a whole lot on price). It would be very nice if there were some native method of pushing it out through a GPO in ..msi form rather than having to go install it on a per-machine basis in its current .exe form. This would also require templates to control its behavior at the machine or user level. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
a.. Open up control panel and double-click on add/remove programs.
Select Microsoft AntiSpyware Select "Change" On the Microsoft AntiSpyware Maintenance Wizard, click next. On the next screen (Microsoft AntiSpyware Maintenance Wizard) select Update Microsoft AntiSpyware and click next. Select Install Let the product update. Click Finish. Andre "Mark Stinson" <spiderman@daily.bugle.com> wrote in message news:u6JQEIYAFHA.2268@CPMSFTNGSA04.privatenews.microsoft.com... > No reply is necessary. These are just observations to pass along to the > development team as I already know how to work around the problem or the > problem is trivial enough that I can live with it. > > The first is a pass-along from another user: he wanted to thank Microsoft > for helping him make a few hundred bucks by providing an easy (and thus > far free) tool to help clean up his clients' computers. > > I can echo some of those sentiments (except the extra money part). Even on > the most badly infected machine on my campus, it took three or four > thorough sweeps to clean out everything and the machine now runs like new. > What I'm seeing so far is a very easy-to-use product that does what it > claims. > > First problem: in spite of an earlier claim to the contrary, the program > is still not updating its definitions before it begins the initial scan. I > just finished downloading and installing it on a friend's computer. The > install completed just fine and I started the initial deep scan at 11:45. > At 11:47 the firewall reported that MAS was trying to access the internet. > At 11:49 MAS reported that it had up-to-date definitions. > > Machine configuration: Athlon XP 2500, 1 GB RAM, WinXP w/SP2 and Norton > Internet Security 2004. Nothing odd about the rest of the setup except > that the machine has XP running in its own partition with applications and > data on a separate volume. > > Second problem: I'm testing out the product at my campus. We're running on > a Win2K domain with lots of configurations pushed out by GPOs. When I log > on to my machine, MAS reports that something is attempting to change my > intranet security settings (a GPO applied at logon) and asks whether I > want to allow it or not. Even with the "remember this" box checked, MAS > does not remember the change. At worst, it's a one-second annoyance that > happens at logon and I can live with it (it's a beta after all). But it > really should be fixed by the time of the release version. > > Machine configuration: Pentium 4 2GHz, 512MB RAM, Win2K Pro w/SP4 in a > Win2K AD domain, Symantec Corporate 8.0, no software firewall > > Third issue: even though MAS is still in beta form, I don't think there is > any question but that it will be used in AD environments when released in > final form. I know of several small offices that are using it under SBS > and are pretty happy with how it behaves (whether they will continue to > use it when released is going to depend a whole lot on price). It would be > very nice if there were some native method of pushing it out through a GPO > in .msi form rather than having to go install it on a per-machine basis in > its current .exe form. This would also require templates to control its > behavior at the machine or user level. > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

