PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Spyware Discussion
Use of "Online Comunities" for error reporting and feedback
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Spyware Discussion
Use of "Online Comunities" for error reporting and feedback
![]() |
Use of "Online Comunities" for error reporting and feedback |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The use of Online Communities for error reporting and
feedback is VERY inefficient and UNSATISFACTORY, IMHO! I, for one, am not goin to waste hours reading every post, and continually returning to see if any new posts have been added to them. When I have a problem, or suggestion, I just add it, likely to "General", since categorization is somewhat arbitrary (as you will see if you look through the existing posts). I hope MS (or their MVP's) have an easy way of reviewing every post, including new replies to old posts. And I suggest MS (or their MVP's) do the reading of posts and replies, and post to a separate category, call it "MVP Summaries" for arguement, a single concise post for each item of general interest or applicability, and update this post as necessary to reflect later posts and replies. This would also relieve me of reading anti-MS rants and spyware suppliers bleats that their software is NOT spyware. I know, this puts the work back on MS, rather than on us poor beta testers! |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I post a FAQ weekly, and link it in my signature, below.
-- Mark L. Ferguson (NOT an MS-MVP) FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.txt marfers notes for windows xp http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/chatNotes.htm .. "Ian" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:1a7e01c50146$3fdb1cb0$a401280a@phx.gbl... > The use of Online Communities for error reporting and > feedback is VERY inefficient and UNSATISFACTORY, IMHO! > > I, for one, am not goin to waste hours reading every > post, and continually returning to see if any new posts > have been added to them. When I have a problem, or > suggestion, I just add it, likely to "General", since > categorization is somewhat arbitrary (as you will see if > you look through the existing posts). > > I hope MS (or their MVP's) have an easy way of reviewing > every post, including new replies to old posts. And I > suggest MS (or their MVP's) do the reading of posts and > replies, and post to a separate category, call it "MVP > Summaries" for arguement, a single concise post for each > item of general interest or applicability, and update > this post as necessary to reflect later posts and > replies. This would also relieve me of reading anti-MS > rants and spyware suppliers bleats that their software is > NOT spyware. > > I know, this puts the work back on MS, rather than on us > poor beta testers! |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

