PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Spyware Discussion
Is this beta for everyone?
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Spyware Discussion
Is this beta for everyone?
![]() |
Is this beta for everyone? |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
Is this beta a public. Or do I need a betapassword? Because I want to try it, as soon as possible... Thanks, Peter |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Same here. I'd love an invite.
>-----Original Message----- >Hello, > >Is this beta a public. Or do I need a betapassword? >Because I want to try it, as soon as possible... > >Thanks, > >Peter >. > |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I would like to join the beta too.
"David Townsend" <dlt9358@hotmail.REMOVE.com> wrote in message news:000701c4f280$c8cb9f60$a401280a@phx.gbl... > Same here. I'd love an invite. > >>-----Original Message----- >>Hello, >> >>Is this beta a public. Or do I need a betapassword? >>Because I want to try it, as soon as possible... >> >>Thanks, >> >>Peter >>. >> |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Read the announcements. They say "make available to Windows customers."
This sounds like a public beta to me, and that's (one thing) I think is coming. They also say they haven't decided on the final form of the offering. That's an interesting dynamic--if we all love the free beta version, what if it costs $? I suspect that'll be covered too--i.e. there may be multi-levels of protection for different costs, one of which will be zero. "Jason B. Jones" <jsquared71@cox.net> wrote in message news:eqAbDHo8EHA.2280@CPMSFTNGSA04.privatenews.microsoft.com... >I would like to join the beta too. > > "David Townsend" <dlt9358@hotmail.REMOVE.com> wrote in message > news:000701c4f280$c8cb9f60$a401280a@phx.gbl... >> Same here. I'd love an invite. >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>Hello, >>> >>>Is this beta a public. Or do I need a betapassword? >>>Because I want to try it, as soon as possible... >>> >>>Thanks, >>> >>>Peter >>>. >>> > > |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes,
They should make this for free. Even after the Beta version. Every option, every thing must be for free in this program. Microsoft makes his problems with this stuff, so microsoft had to make something to stop it. FOR FREE >-----Original Message----- >Read the announcements. They say "make available to Windows customers." > >This sounds like a public beta to me, and that's (one thing) I think is >coming. > >They also say they haven't decided on the final form of the offering. >That's an interesting dynamic--if we all love the free beta version, what if >it costs $? I suspect that'll be covered too--i.e. there may be >multi-levels of protection for different costs, one of which will be zero. > >"Jason B. Jones" <jsquared71@cox.net> wrote in message >news:eqAbDHo8EHA.2280@CPMSFTNGSA04.privatenews.microsoft. com... >>I would like to join the beta too. >> >> "David Townsend" <dlt9358@hotmail.REMOVE.com> wrote in message >> news:000701c4f280$c8cb9f60$a401280a@phx.gbl... >>> Same here. I'd love an invite. >>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>Hello, >>>> >>>>Is this beta a public. Or do I need a betapassword? >>>>Because I want to try it, as soon as possible... >>>> >>>>Thanks, >>>> >>>>Peter >>>>. >>>> >> >> > > >. > |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> "Bill Sanderson" <Bill_Sanderson@msn.com.plugh.org> wrote in message
> news:%23pt3Cko8EHA.2308@cpmsftngsa05.privatenews.microsoft.com... > > They also say they haven't decided on the final form of the offering. > That's an interesting dynamic--if we all love the free beta version, > what if it costs $? I suspect that'll be covered too--i.e. there may > be multi-levels of protection for different costs, one of which will > be zero. Offering different versions with different levels of protection would be a mistake in my opinion. I see the difference between the paid version and the free version as managability - the free version for home users should be ignorant of domains, networks, and policies. The 'paid for' version should be completely configurable by a domain admin down to the last byte. -- AZC |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
This beta will be made publicly available; there is no release date beyond
the initial press release statement. Press release can be found here: http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/...2-16GIANTPR.asp No beta id or invitation is required to download the beta. Thanks, - Jason J. Joyce (JJJ) Microsoft "Bill Sanderson" <Bill_Sanderson@msn.com.plugh.org> wrote in message news:%23pt3Cko8EHA.2308@cpmsftngsa05.privatenews.microsoft.com... > Read the announcements. They say "make available to Windows customers." > > This sounds like a public beta to me, and that's (one thing) I think is > coming. > > They also say they haven't decided on the final form of the offering. > That's an interesting dynamic--if we all love the free beta version, what > if it costs $? I suspect that'll be covered too--i.e. there may be > multi-levels of protection for different costs, one of which will be zero. > > "Jason B. Jones" <jsquared71@cox.net> wrote in message > news:eqAbDHo8EHA.2280@CPMSFTNGSA04.privatenews.microsoft.com... >>I would like to join the beta too. >> >> "David Townsend" <dlt9358@hotmail.REMOVE.com> wrote in message >> news:000701c4f280$c8cb9f60$a401280a@phx.gbl... >>> Same here. I'd love an invite. >>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>Hello, >>>> >>>>Is this beta a public. Or do I need a betapassword? >>>>Because I want to try it, as soon as possible... >>>> >>>>Thanks, >>>> >>>>Peter >>>>. >>>> >> >> > > |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Again--thanks for clarifying!
"Jason J. Joyce [MSFT]" <jasonjoy@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:u%23V1$fr8EHA.1648@CPMSFTNGSA04.privatenews.microsoft.com... > This beta will be made publicly available; there is no release date beyond > the initial press release statement. Press release can be found here: > http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/...2-16GIANTPR.asp > > No beta id or invitation is required to download the beta. > > Thanks, > - Jason J. Joyce (JJJ) > Microsoft > > "Bill Sanderson" <Bill_Sanderson@msn.com.plugh.org> wrote in message > news:%23pt3Cko8EHA.2308@cpmsftngsa05.privatenews.microsoft.com... >> Read the announcements. They say "make available to Windows customers." >> >> This sounds like a public beta to me, and that's (one thing) I think is >> coming. >> >> They also say they haven't decided on the final form of the offering. >> That's an interesting dynamic--if we all love the free beta version, what >> if it costs $? I suspect that'll be covered too--i.e. there may be >> multi-levels of protection for different costs, one of which will be >> zero. >> >> "Jason B. Jones" <jsquared71@cox.net> wrote in message >> news:eqAbDHo8EHA.2280@CPMSFTNGSA04.privatenews.microsoft.com... >>>I would like to join the beta too. >>> >>> "David Townsend" <dlt9358@hotmail.REMOVE.com> wrote in message >>> news:000701c4f280$c8cb9f60$a401280a@phx.gbl... >>>> Same here. I'd love an invite. >>>> >>>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>>Hello, >>>>> >>>>>Is this beta a public. Or do I need a betapassword? >>>>>Because I want to try it, as soon as possible... >>>>> >>>>>Thanks, >>>>> >>>>>Peter >>>>>. >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You make it free, Microsoft gets sued. 'Nuff said >-----Original Message----- >Yes, > >They should make this for free. Even after the Beta >version. >Every option, every thing must be for free in this >program. > >Microsoft makes his problems with this stuff, so >microsoft >had to make something to stop it. FOR FREE > > >>-----Original Message----- >>Read the announcements. They say "make available to >Windows customers." >> >>This sounds like a public beta to me, and that's (one >thing) I think is >>coming. >> >>They also say they haven't decided on the final form of >the offering. >>That's an interesting dynamic--if we all love the free >beta version, what if >>it costs $? I suspect that'll be covered too--i.e. >there may be >>multi-levels of protection for different costs, one of >which will be zero. >> >>"Jason B. Jones" <jsquared71@cox.net> wrote in message >>news:eqAbDHo8EHA.2280@CPMSFTNGSA04.privatenews.microsoft .. >com... >>>I would like to join the beta too. >>> >>> "David Townsend" <dlt9358@hotmail.REMOVE.com> wrote in >message >>> news:000701c4f280$c8cb9f60$a401280a@phx.gbl... >>>> Same here. I'd love an invite. >>>> >>>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>>Hello, >>>>> >>>>>Is this beta a public. Or do I need a betapassword? >>>>>Because I want to try it, as soon as possible... >>>>> >>>>>Thanks, >>>>> >>>>>Peter >>>>>. >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> >>. >> >. > |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Microsoft should follow lavasofts pricing scheme - the
free version will be able to remove all spyware but the "paid for" version could include active monitoring, enterpise stuff, etc. Ad-Aware SE Personal compared to Ad-Aware Professional. My .02. Jeff >-----Original Message----- >Yes, > >They should make this for free. Even after the Beta >version. >Every option, every thing must be for free in this >program. > >Microsoft makes his problems with this stuff, so >microsoft >had to make something to stop it. FOR FREE > > >>-----Original Message----- >>Read the announcements. They say "make available to >Windows customers." >> >>This sounds like a public beta to me, and that's (one >thing) I think is >>coming. >> >>They also say they haven't decided on the final form of >the offering. >>That's an interesting dynamic--if we all love the free >beta version, what if >>it costs $? I suspect that'll be covered too--i.e. >there may be >>multi-levels of protection for different costs, one of >which will be zero. >> >>"Jason B. Jones" <jsquared71@cox.net> wrote in message >>news:eqAbDHo8EHA.2280@CPMSFTNGSA04.privatenews.microsoft .. >com... >>>I would like to join the beta too. >>> >>> "David Townsend" <dlt9358@hotmail.REMOVE.com> wrote in >message >>> news:000701c4f280$c8cb9f60$a401280a@phx.gbl... >>>> Same here. I'd love an invite. >>>> >>>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>>Hello, >>>>> >>>>>Is this beta a public. Or do I need a betapassword? >>>>>Because I want to try it, as soon as possible... >>>>> >>>>>Thanks, >>>>> >>>>>Peter >>>>>. >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> >>. >> >. > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

