PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft DotNet
Microsoft Dot NET Framework Forms
Is Whidbey already dead?
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft DotNet
Microsoft Dot NET Framework Forms
Is Whidbey already dead?
![]() |
Is Whidbey already dead? |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello all,
I was just reading the Blog by Mike Harsh: http://blogs.msdn.com/mharsh/archiv.../20/231888.aspx and it seems that Whidbey is already obsolete, even though Microsoft has not released it yet. Am I missing something here... I have been using .NET (C#) for about 2 years now, and I can say with confidence that it is the best development platform I have ever used. We have just completed a two year migration project in which we moved over ten years of legacy microsoft code to .NET. The resulting system proved to be a stable one and I have never had this much fun designing windows applications. However, I can't believe MS is already leaving this new technology behind... It is very frustrating because I truly believed Microsoft had finally developed a platform that was stable, robust, and extremely easy to learn and use. Maybe I should just get out of IT altogether...I am really getting tired of this crap. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
<MyMaxWebMail@hotmail.com> schrieb:
> http://blogs.msdn.com/mharsh/archiv.../20/231888.aspx > > and it seems that Whidbey is already obsolete, even though Microsoft > has not released it yet. How do you come to this conclusion? Windows Forms are supported for 10 years after the release of Whidbey, and maybe even longer if they remain included in the .NET Framework and VS.NET. A problem would arise if Microsoft suddently removes the Windows Forms designer from Orcas, the version of VS.NET after Whidbey. However, it's very unlikely that this will happen. -- M S Herfried K. Wagner M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/> V B <URL:http://classicvb.org/petition/> |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
<MyMaxWebMail@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I was just reading the Blog by Mike Harsh: > > http://blogs.msdn.com/mharsh/archiv.../20/231888.aspx > > and it seems that Whidbey is already obsolete, even though Microsoft > has not released it yet. > > Am I missing something here... Well for a start, you're equating Whidbey with Windows Forms - I don't see why. > I have been using .NET (C#) for about 2 years now, and I can say with > confidence that it is the best development platform I have ever used. > We have just completed a two year migration project in which we moved > over ten years of legacy microsoft code to .NET. The resulting system > proved to be a stable one and I have never had this much fun designing > windows applications. However, I can't believe MS is already leaving > this new technology behind... They're not. From the article: <quote> So if you write an app on top of Whidbey, you'll be able to call PSS about issues until around 2015. </quote> Not adding new features etc isn't the same as leaving technology behind. -- Jon Skeet - <skeet@pobox.com> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet If replying to the group, please do not mail me too |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

