PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Security and Anti-Spyware Community
ethics
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Security and Anti-Spyware Community
ethics
![]() |
ethics |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
some people belive that ms should fix the problems rather
than selling you products that fix them like anti spyware, and av software. so my question is this. if ms opens a line of av software will it be free? since the problem is usually caused by microsoft mistakes? lik an enhancement to the operating system? I mean how many times do you hear about the new virus for the mac or linux? so if it was thier mistake do we have to pay to protect ourselves? If so kudos to Microsoft but beware any av software company, microsoft vs netshield was a win, and ms vs mcafee trend and symantec will be a battle. I wonder when the first virus will come out that exploits ms av code? and how fast microsoft will have a fix for it? It certainly would not make ethical sense for microsoft to charge us for spyware or antivirus protection. It is thier shotty code that usually leads to these infections. I am not a linux guru, I am a true microsoft fan, however I do think that they owe it to the people who purchased windows and recieved viruses and spyware in the past to give this away. also I cannot see why corporations would put the trust of security in microsofts hands, when microsoft is the insecure operating systems which they are trying to protect. I would want a security company that is not the SAME company that wrote the software I am trying to protect, if they didnt get it right the first time, why would they get it right the second. Also, I know MS has POCKETS! so anything is possible. However protecting for viruses and releasing virus definitions IMMEDIATLY after a virus is released is tough work. I have never seen microsoft release code in HOURS!!! OK so I think MSAV, and SPYWARE is a good thing for the home users, (IF IT IS FREE) but I dont think that they should try to penetrate the corporate market this is just silly. C:\RANT\OFF.EXE |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"ethics" <wiggledoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:0c6901c4f466$b178c4e0$a401280a@phx.gbl... >...I mean how many times do you hear > about the new virus for the mac or linux?... Everyday something new for them just like the other OSs. Thats why they make Antivirus software for them. As popularity grows expect more. Try to manage code written to run on more combinations than you can possibility think about and see how fun that is to try to keep it where it can run on them. Mac's don't have that many combinations, Apple has pretty well seen to that (stifle competition) and Linux doesn't have all the drivers needed to run as many combinations yet. (note the yet). Nice rant but try to think it out a little better next time. This ain't the 50's and Wally and the Beav didn't pack 44's to school. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
there are over 100,000 viruses for windows, there are
less than 10 for mac and linux added up. Richard >-----Original Message----- > >"ethics" <wiggledoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message >news:0c6901c4f466$b178c4e0$a401280a@phx.gbl... > >...I mean how many times do you hear >> about the new virus for the mac or linux?... > >Everyday something new for them just like the other OSs. > >Thats why they make Antivirus software for them. > >As popularity grows expect more. Try to manage code written to run on more >combinations than you can possibility think about and see how fun that is to >try to keep it where it can run on them. Mac's don't have that many >combinations, Apple has pretty well seen to that (stifle competition) and >Linux doesn't have all the drivers needed to run as many combinations yet. >(note the yet). > >Nice rant but try to think it out a little better next time. This ain't the >50's and Wally and the Beav didn't pack 44's to school. > > >. > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Why would Linux users write viruses for their own computers?
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:0f1e01c4f4d0$f3c02f90$a401280a@phx.gbl... > there are over 100,000 viruses for windows, there are > less than 10 for mac and linux added up. > > Richard > >>-----Original Message----- >> >>"ethics" <wiggledoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>news:0c6901c4f466$b178c4e0$a401280a@phx.gbl... >> >...I mean how many times do you hear >>> about the new virus for the mac or linux?... >> >>Everyday something new for them just like the other OSs. >> >>Thats why they make Antivirus software for them. >> >>As popularity grows expect more. Try to manage code > written to run on more >>combinations than you can possibility think about and > see how fun that is to >>try to keep it where it can run on them. Mac's don't > have that many >>combinations, Apple has pretty well seen to that (stifle > competition) and >>Linux doesn't have all the drivers needed to run as many > combinations yet. >>(note the yet). >> >>Nice rant but try to think it out a little better next > time. This ain't the >>50's and Wally and the Beav didn't pack 44's to school. >> >> >>. >> |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Why does anyone write them period?
"John" <everett.mcgill@remove_this_to_email_me.gmail.com> wrote in message news:enWJaHP9EHA.2556@cpmsftngsa05.privatenews.microsoft.com... > Why would Linux users write viruses for their own computers? > > > <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:0f1e01c4f4d0$f3c02f90$a401280a@phx.gbl... >> there are over 100,000 viruses for windows, there are >> less than 10 for mac and linux added up. >> >> Richard >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>> >>>"ethics" <wiggledoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>news:0c6901c4f466$b178c4e0$a401280a@phx.gbl... >>> >...I mean how many times do you hear >>>> about the new virus for the mac or linux?... >>> >>>Everyday something new for them just like the other OSs. >>> >>>Thats why they make Antivirus software for them. >>> >>>As popularity grows expect more. Try to manage code >> written to run on more >>>combinations than you can possibility think about and >> see how fun that is to >>>try to keep it where it can run on them. Mac's don't >> have that many >>>combinations, Apple has pretty well seen to that (stifle >> competition) and >>>Linux doesn't have all the drivers needed to run as many >> combinations yet. >>>(note the yet). >>> >>>Nice rant but try to think it out a little better next >> time. This ain't the >>>50's and Wally and the Beav didn't pack 44's to school. >>> >>> >>>. >>> > > |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Remind me not to let you count my money.
Mac's (I quit counting at 25 of the Mac only ones) and didn't count the ones in the list along with PC's at the bottom http://www.ciac.org/ciac/CIACVirusDatabase.html Linux - 7 and counting. http://antivirus.about.com/od/linuxunixviruses/ Funny thing is I have several PC's running here and none have been infected by either viruses or spyware. I'm not complaining either way, I still make money disinfecting them whatever the OS. <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:0f1e01c4f4d0$f3c02f90$a401280a@phx.gbl... > there are over 100,000 viruses for windows, there are > less than 10 for mac and linux added up. > > Richard > >>-----Original Message----- >> >>"ethics" <wiggledoo@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>news:0c6901c4f466$b178c4e0$a401280a@phx.gbl... >> >...I mean how many times do you hear >>> about the new virus for the mac or linux?... >> >>Everyday something new for them just like the other OSs. >> >>Thats why they make Antivirus software for them. >> >>As popularity grows expect more. Try to manage code > written to run on more >>combinations than you can possibility think about and > see how fun that is to >>try to keep it where it can run on them. Mac's don't > have that many >>combinations, Apple has pretty well seen to that (stifle > competition) and >>Linux doesn't have all the drivers needed to run as many > combinations yet. >>(note the yet). >> >>Nice rant but try to think it out a little better next > time. This ain't the >>50's and Wally and the Beav didn't pack 44's to school. >> >> >>. >> |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> there are over 100,000 viruses for windows, there are > less than 10 for mac and linux added up. You made that up. There are many more than 10 Mac and Linux viruses. Additionally, don't think that Mac, Linux, and Windows are the only OSes out there. There are many, NetBSD, Sun Solaris, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, HP-UX, as well as many others. Also do recall that computer viruses existed before there was anything called Windows and before there was even a company called Microsoft. |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

