PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Security Signatures
False Positives on custom HOSTS file
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Security Signatures
False Positives on custom HOSTS file
![]() |
False Positives on custom HOSTS file |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Many of us use custom HOSTS file to prevent sites that contain
advertisements, spyware, and other nasties. I would urge Microsoft to exclude from their Anti-Spyware program any hosts entries which resolve to: 127.0.0.1 localhost 127.1 0.0.0.0 We use these commonly to prevent sites we dont want. For example: 127.1 ad.preferences.com 127.1 ads.doubleclick.com 127.1 ads.infospace.com 127.1 ads.msn.com 127.1 ads.switchboard.com 127.1 ad.linkexchange.com 127.1 ads.enliven.com 127.1 oz.valueclick.com 127.1 banner.linkexchange.com 127.1 commonwealth.riddler.com -L |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
LNC,
I have all those entries and many more in my HOSTS file and *none* of the entries were detected ... ____________________________________________________________ Mike Burgess [MVP Internet Explorer] http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/ Blocking Spyware, Adware, Parasites, Hijackers, Trojans, with a HOSTS file http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm [updated 01-04-05] Please post replies to this Newsgroup, email address is invalid -- "Locke Nash Cole" <junkmauler@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ev50MBE9EHA.2468@cpmsftngsa05.privatenews.microsoft.com... > Many of us use custom HOSTS file to prevent sites that contain > advertisements, spyware, and other nasties. > > I would urge Microsoft to exclude from their Anti-Spyware program any > hosts entries which resolve to: > > 127.0.0.1 > localhost > 127.1 > 0.0.0.0 > > We use these commonly to prevent sites we dont want. > For example: > > 127.1 ad.preferences.com > 127.1 ads.doubleclick.com > 127.1 ads.infospace.com > 127.1 ads.msn.com > 127.1 ads.switchboard.com > 127.1 ad.linkexchange.com > 127.1 ads.enliven.com > 127.1 oz.valueclick.com > 127.1 banner.linkexchange.com > 127.1 commonwealth.riddler.com > > -L > |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Several were detected here as well, we redirect many such
sites as well. our detection complained about adwords.google.com being redirected .. and for reference this is not the first entry in the host file either. in fact it appears on line 2097. So the scanner did not complain about many sites, but for some reason picked this one out of 4108 entries in the file. >-----Original Message----- >LNC, >I have all those entries and many more in my HOSTS file >and *none* of the entries were detected ... >_________________________________________________________ ___ >Mike Burgess [MVP Internet Explorer] http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/ >Blocking Spyware, Adware, Parasites, Hijackers, Trojans, with a HOSTS file >http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm [updated 01-04- 05] >Please post replies to this Newsgroup, email address is invalid >-- > >"Locke Nash Cole" <junkmauler@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:ev50MBE9EHA.2468@cpmsftngsa05.privatenews.microsoft. com... >> Many of us use custom HOSTS file to prevent sites that contain >> advertisements, spyware, and other nasties. >> >> I would urge Microsoft to exclude from their Anti- Spyware program any >> hosts entries which resolve to: >> >> 127.0.0.1 >> localhost >> 127.1 >> 0.0.0.0 >> >> We use these commonly to prevent sites we dont want. >> For example: >> >> 127.1 ad.preferences.com >> 127.1 ads.doubleclick.com >> 127.1 ads.infospace.com >> 127.1 ads.msn.com >> 127.1 ads.switchboard.com >> 127.1 ad.linkexchange.com >> 127.1 ads.enliven.com >> 127.1 oz.valueclick.com >> 127.1 banner.linkexchange.com >> 127.1 commonwealth.riddler.com >> >> -L >> > > >. > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In addition the HOSTS file is managed by a logon script
from the domain. the spyware realtime popped up said the file was being changed and gave the user the option to get out.. that will not work. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Mike,
I think it depends on which hosts you have in there, not the actual function of redirecting hosts. It counted several of mine as spyware when actually they are manual entries by me to PREVENT spyware :P -L "Mike Burgess" <winhelp2002@spamthis.com> wrote in message news:Of4R6LE9EHA.2344@CPMSFTNGSA04.privatenews.microsoft.com... > LNC, > I have all those entries and many more in my HOSTS file > and *none* of the entries were detected ... > ____________________________________________________________ > Mike Burgess [MVP Internet Explorer] http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/ > Blocking Spyware, Adware, Parasites, Hijackers, Trojans, with a HOSTS file > http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm [updated 01-04-05] > Please post replies to this Newsgroup, email address is invalid > -- > > "Locke Nash Cole" <junkmauler@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:ev50MBE9EHA.2468@cpmsftngsa05.privatenews.microsoft.com... >> Many of us use custom HOSTS file to prevent sites that contain >> advertisements, spyware, and other nasties. >> >> I would urge Microsoft to exclude from their Anti-Spyware program any >> hosts entries which resolve to: >> >> 127.0.0.1 >> localhost >> 127.1 >> 0.0.0.0 >> >> We use these commonly to prevent sites we dont want. >> For example: >> >> 127.1 ad.preferences.com >> 127.1 ads.doubleclick.com >> 127.1 ads.infospace.com >> 127.1 ads.msn.com >> 127.1 ads.switchboard.com >> 127.1 ad.linkexchange.com >> 127.1 ads.enliven.com >> 127.1 oz.valueclick.com >> 127.1 banner.linkexchange.com >> 127.1 commonwealth.riddler.com >> >> -L >> > > |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Locke Nash Cole" <junkmauler@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ev50MBE9EHA.2468@cpmsftngsa05.privatenews.microsoft.com... > > Many of us use custom HOSTS file to prevent sites that contain > advertisements, spyware, and other nasties. > > I would urge Microsoft to exclude from their Anti-Spyware program any > hosts entries which resolve to: > > 127.0.0.1 > localhost > 127.1 > 0.0.0.0 > > We use these commonly to prevent sites we dont want. > For example: > {Snip} Hi Locke, I agree in general. I could be wrong, but I think that MSAS actually watches for changes to the HOSTS file rather than looking at what is actually in there. Nevertheless, I do think that a change to HOSTS that *adds* a reference such as: 127.0.0.1 aaa.bbb.ccc should be accepted by default and a setting allowed to change such behavious. My reasoning is that the worst that this can do is block access to a site - it cannot cause someone to get infected (as far as I know). Happy to be corrected.... Alan. |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

