PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Security Signatures
Misidentified File
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft AntiSpyware
Security Signatures
Misidentified File
![]() |
Misidentified File |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
A .js file on my system (a file created by my company
apparently via RoboHelp based on the comments in the file) was identified as "iMesh (Adware Bundler)" Should I report this to someone so they can see how it was misidentified? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'd say post details here--this seems a reasonable group to pick for such
issues. If you feel there's a security issue in giving out the precise details of the filename involved, I'm not sure what to suggest. The product has provisions for mailing suspicious files in, but I haven't confirmed whether those are, in fact, operational in this beta. I've used them and the buttons seem to function, but it happens very fast, and I don't get any dialog or confirmation of the send. And, those buttons are for reporting possible malicious stuff, not for reporting false positives, as far as I can see. I hope Microsoft will clarify this reporting issue because I've seen enough reports of similar items that I think there will be significant feedback of this sort from this beta--and I hope they can capture the knowledge. "Jeff" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:17bf01c4f405$9a83a8b0$a501280a@phx.gbl... >A .js file on my system (a file created by my company > apparently via RoboHelp based on the comments in the file) > was identified as "iMesh (Adware Bundler)" Should I > report this to someone so they can see how it was > misidentified? |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
But what details would I post other than the entire
contents of the .JS file? I'm not sure they'd like it if I posted the entire thing here. I guess I'll wait and see if someone knows where to send it/if they're interested. Thanks for the reply though. >-----Original Message----- >I'd say post details here--this seems a reasonable group to pick for such >issues. > >If you feel there's a security issue in giving out the precise details of >the filename involved, I'm not sure what to suggest. The product has >provisions for mailing suspicious files in, but I haven't confirmed whether >those are, in fact, operational in this beta. I've used them and the >buttons seem to function, but it happens very fast, and I don't get any >dialog or confirmation of the send. And, those buttons are for reporting >possible malicious stuff, not for reporting false positives, as far as I can >see. > >I hope Microsoft will clarify this reporting issue because I've seen enough >reports of similar items that I think there will be significant feedback of >this sort from this beta--and I hope they can capture the knowledge. > >"Jeff" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >news:17bf01c4f405$9a83a8b0$a501280a@phx.gbl... >>A .js file on my system (a file created by my company >> apparently via RoboHelp based on the comments in the file) >> was identified as "iMesh (Adware Bundler)" Should I >> report this to someone so they can see how it was >> misidentified? > > >. > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jeff - check out my post later in this group.
There's clear information available on criteria for listing, and a form for vendor disputes. I think this is what you need--hope it helps! "Jeff" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:08f401c4f40d$b37e5650$a401280a@phx.gbl... > But what details would I post other than the entire > contents of the .JS file? I'm not sure they'd like it if > I posted the entire thing here. I guess I'll wait and see > if someone knows where to send it/if they're interested. > Thanks for the reply though. > >>-----Original Message----- >>I'd say post details here--this seems a reasonable group > to pick for such >>issues. >> >>If you feel there's a security issue in giving out the > precise details of >>the filename involved, I'm not sure what to suggest. The > product has >>provisions for mailing suspicious files in, but I haven't > confirmed whether >>those are, in fact, operational in this beta. I've used > them and the >>buttons seem to function, but it happens very fast, and I > don't get any >>dialog or confirmation of the send. And, those buttons > are for reporting >>possible malicious stuff, not for reporting false > positives, as far as I can >>see. >> >>I hope Microsoft will clarify this reporting issue > because I've seen enough >>reports of similar items that I think there will be > significant feedback of >>this sort from this beta--and I hope they can capture the > knowledge. >> >>"Jeff" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in > message >>news:17bf01c4f405$9a83a8b0$a501280a@phx.gbl... >>>A .js file on my system (a file created by my company >>> apparently via RoboHelp based on the comments in the > file) >>> was identified as "iMesh (Adware Bundler)" Should I >>> report this to someone so they can see how it was >>> misidentified? >> >> >>. >> |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
We've got a bug opened tracking this false positive. I
don't know when it's going to be fixed, but it was found inside Microsoft, too. Thanks, Joe >-----Original Message----- >Jeff - check out my post later in this group. >There's clear information available on criteria for listing, and a form for >vendor disputes. > >I think this is what you need--hope it helps! > >"Jeff" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >news:08f401c4f40d$b37e5650$a401280a@phx.gbl... >> But what details would I post other than the entire >> contents of the .JS file? I'm not sure they'd like it if >> I posted the entire thing here. I guess I'll wait and see >> if someone knows where to send it/if they're interested. >> Thanks for the reply though. >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>I'd say post details here--this seems a reasonable group >> to pick for such >>>issues. >>> >>>If you feel there's a security issue in giving out the >> precise details of >>>the filename involved, I'm not sure what to suggest. The >> product has >>>provisions for mailing suspicious files in, but I haven't >> confirmed whether >>>those are, in fact, operational in this beta. I've used >> them and the >>>buttons seem to function, but it happens very fast, and I >> don't get any >>>dialog or confirmation of the send. And, those buttons >> are for reporting >>>possible malicious stuff, not for reporting false >> positives, as far as I can >>>see. >>> >>>I hope Microsoft will clarify this reporting issue >> because I've seen enough >>>reports of similar items that I think there will be >> significant feedback of >>>this sort from this beta--and I hope they can capture the >> knowledge. >>> >>>"Jeff" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in >> message >>>news:17bf01c4f405$9a83a8b0$a501280a@phx.gbl... >>>>A .js file on my system (a file created by my company >>>> apparently via RoboHelp based on the comments in the >> file) >>>> was identified as "iMesh (Adware Bundler)" Should I >>>> report this to someone so they can see how it was >>>> misidentified? >>> >>> >>>. >>> > > >. > |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Good, 'cause Oracle 9 client includes some .js files with
robohelp in them. "Removing" would not be advised. >-----Original Message----- >We've got a bug opened tracking this false positive. I >don't know when it's going to be fixed, but it was found >inside Microsoft, too. > >Thanks, >Joe > >>-----Original Message----- >>Jeff - check out my post later in this group. >>There's clear information available on criteria for >listing, and a form for >>vendor disputes. >> >>I think this is what you need--hope it helps! >> >>"Jeff" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in >message >>news:08f401c4f40d$b37e5650$a401280a@phx.gbl... >>> But what details would I post other than the entire >>> contents of the .JS file? I'm not sure they'd like it >if >>> I posted the entire thing here. I guess I'll wait and >see >>> if someone knows where to send it/if they're >interested. >>> Thanks for the reply though. >>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>I'd say post details here--this seems a reasonable >group >>> to pick for such >>>>issues. >>>> >>>>If you feel there's a security issue in giving out the >>> precise details of >>>>the filename involved, I'm not sure what to suggest. >The >>> product has >>>>provisions for mailing suspicious files in, but I >haven't >>> confirmed whether >>>>those are, in fact, operational in this beta. I've >used >>> them and the >>>>buttons seem to function, but it happens very fast, >and I >>> don't get any >>>>dialog or confirmation of the send. And, those buttons >>> are for reporting >>>>possible malicious stuff, not for reporting false >>> positives, as far as I can >>>>see. >>>> >>>>I hope Microsoft will clarify this reporting issue >>> because I've seen enough >>>>reports of similar items that I think there will be >>> significant feedback of >>>>this sort from this beta--and I hope they can capture >the >>> knowledge. >>>> >>>>"Jeff" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in >>> message >>>>news:17bf01c4f405$9a83a8b0$a501280a@phx.gbl... >>>>>A .js file on my system (a file created by my company >>>>> apparently via RoboHelp based on the comments in the >>> file) >>>>> was identified as "iMesh (Adware Bundler)" Should I >>>>> report this to someone so they can see how it was >>>>> misidentified? >>>> >>>> >>>>. >>>> >> >> >>. >> >. > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

